PURPOSE: To evaluate visual and anatomic outcomes in response to the conversion of treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) refractory to previous treatment. We also investigated the effect of genetic factors. METHODS: We recruited patients with AMD or PCV refractory to ranibizumab and initiated aflibercept treatment. Changes in the logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and central retinal thickness (CRT) measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) 6 months after the conversion were compared between the AMD and PCV groups. We also genotyped each patient for the ARMS2 A69S, CFH Y402H, and I62V alleles, and investigated the association between genotype and treatment response. RESULTS: Mean age of the participants was 75.6 ± 8.0 years. There were 15 patients with AMD and 26 patients with PCV. While PCV patients gained about 1 line of vision (0.40 ± 0.37 to 0.31 ± 0.40, P = 0.003), AMD patients did not show significant improvement (0.41 ± 0.37 to 0.42 ± 0.39, P = 0.699) despite the decrease in CRT (202.1 ± 113.7 to 131.2 ± 55.7 μm, P = 0.003). The prevalence of dry retina after treatment was higher among PCV patients (80.8 vs 46.7 %, P = 0.024). There was no significant difference between patients with risk and non-risk alleles for ARMS2 A69S, CFH Y402H, and I62V. CONCLUSION: In AMD or PCV patients refractory to ranibizumab, switching to aflibercept is generally effective regardless of patient genotype. PCV patients may benefit more significantly than AMD patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate visual and anatomic outcomes in response to the conversion of treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) refractory to previous treatment. We also investigated the effect of genetic factors. METHODS: We recruited patients with AMD or PCV refractory to ranibizumab and initiated aflibercept treatment. Changes in the logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and central retinal thickness (CRT) measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) 6 months after the conversion were compared between the AMD and PCV groups. We also genotyped each patient for the ARMS2A69S, CFHY402H, and I62V alleles, and investigated the association between genotype and treatment response. RESULTS: Mean age of the participants was 75.6 ± 8.0 years. There were 15 patients with AMD and 26 patients with PCV. While PCV patients gained about 1 line of vision (0.40 ± 0.37 to 0.31 ± 0.40, P = 0.003), AMDpatients did not show significant improvement (0.41 ± 0.37 to 0.42 ± 0.39, P = 0.699) despite the decrease in CRT (202.1 ± 113.7 to 131.2 ± 55.7 μm, P = 0.003). The prevalence of dry retina after treatment was higher among PCV patients (80.8 vs 46.7 %, P = 0.024). There was no significant difference between patients with risk and non-risk alleles for ARMS2A69S, CFHY402H, and I62V. CONCLUSION: In AMD or PCV patients refractory to ranibizumab, switching to aflibercept is generally effective regardless of patient genotype. PCV patients may benefit more significantly than AMDpatients.
Authors: Robert J Klein; Caroline Zeiss; Emily Y Chew; Jen-Yue Tsai; Richard S Sackler; Chad Haynes; Alice K Henning; John Paul SanGiovanni; Shrikant M Mane; Susan T Mayne; Michael B Bracken; Frederick L Ferris; Jurg Ott; Colin Barnstable; Josephine Hoh Journal: Science Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Silke Schmidt; Michael A Hauser; William K Scott; Eric A Postel; Anita Agarwal; Paul Gallins; Frank Wong; Yu Sarah Chen; Kylee Spencer; Nathalie Schnetz-Boutaud; Jonathan L Haines; Margaret A Pericak-Vance Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: David M Brown; Peter K Kaiser; Mark Michels; Gisele Soubrane; Jeffrey S Heier; Robert Y Kim; Judy P Sy; Susan Schneider Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Julie L Gasperini; Amani A Fawzi; Ani Khondkaryan; Linda Lam; Lawrence P Chong; Dean Eliott; Alexander C Walsh; John Hwang; SriniVas R Sadda Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2011-07-26 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Gregory S Hageman; Don H Anderson; Lincoln V Johnson; Lisa S Hancox; Andrew J Taiber; Lisa I Hardisty; Jill L Hageman; Heather A Stockman; James D Borchardt; Karen M Gehrs; Richard J H Smith; Giuliana Silvestri; Stephen R Russell; Caroline C W Klaver; Irene Barbazetto; Stanley Chang; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; Gaetano R Barile; John C Merriam; R Theodore Smith; Adam K Olsh; Julie Bergeron; Jana Zernant; Joanna E Merriam; Bert Gold; Michael Dean; Rando Allikmets Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-05-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Farshad Abedi; Sanjeewa Wickremasinghe; Andrea J Richardson; Amirul F M Islam; Robyn H Guymer; Paul N Baird Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jeffrey S Heier; David M Brown; Victor Chong; Jean-Francois Korobelnik; Peter K Kaiser; Quan Dong Nguyen; Bernd Kirchhof; Allen Ho; Yuichiro Ogura; George D Yancopoulos; Neil Stahl; Robert Vitti; Alyson J Berliner; Yuhwen Soo; Majid Anderesi; Georg Groetzbach; Bernd Sommerauer; Rupert Sandbrink; Christian Simader; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Nicholas Papadopoulos; Joel Martin; Qin Ruan; Ashique Rafique; Michael P Rosconi; Ergang Shi; Erica A Pyles; George D Yancopoulos; Neil Stahl; Stanley J Wiegand Journal: Angiogenesis Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 9.596
Authors: L Tiosano; O Segal; N Mathalone; A Pollack; R Ehrlich; I Klemperer; Y Barak; I Moroz; I Chowers; M Goldstein Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Alfredo García-Layana; Marta S Figueroa; Javier Araiz; José M Ruiz-Moreno; Francisco Gómez-Ulla; Luis Arias-Barquet; Nicholas Reiter Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.923