Alasdair N Warwick1, Hannah H Leaver2, Andrew J Lotery1, Srini V Goverdhan1. 1. Clinical Neurosciences Research Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.; Southampton Eye Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK. 2. Clinical Neurosciences Research Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Abstract
AIM: To determine real life clinical outcomes in poorly responsive and treatment-naïve neovascular age related macular degeneration (nvAMD) patients using bimonthly fixed dosing aflibercept regimen. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 165 eyes with nvAMD started on aflibercept at Southampton Eye Unit between June 2013 and June 2014. Patients were either switched from pro re nata (PRN) ranibizumab/bevacizumab due to poor response (107 eyes), or treatment-naïve (58 eyes). Patients initially received 3-monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections followed by 2-monthly fixed doses. Clinic visits were scheduled at month 0, 4, 10 and 12. Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) from baseline were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The proportion of patients maintaining BCVA (<15 letters loss) at 12mo was also evaluated. RESULTS: Mean BCVA change at month 12 was +3.29 and +4.67 letters in the switched and naïve aflibercept groups respectively (P<0.01). BCVA was maintained in 95.3% of switched and 96.6% of naïve patients. CRT at month 12 showed a decrease of -6.16 µm in the switched group and -35.36 µm in the naïve group (P<0.01). Patients previously treated with ranibizumab/bevacizumab had on average received 7.4 ranibizumab/bevacizumab injections over 12.6mo, attending 10 clinic visits. The fixed dosing aflibercept regimen required an average of 7.1 injections (naïve group), 7.5 injections (switched group) and 4 clinic visits per year. CONCLUSION: Fixed bimonthly aflibercept is effective in both treatment-naïve and poorly responsive nvAMD patients. Adopting a fixed dosing regimen can reduce patient burden without compromising on outcomes.
AIM: To determine real life clinical outcomes in poorly responsive and treatment-naïve neovascular age related macular degeneration (nvAMD) patients using bimonthly fixed dosing aflibercept regimen. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 165 eyes with nvAMD started on aflibercept at Southampton Eye Unit between June 2013 and June 2014. Patients were either switched from pro re nata (PRN) ranibizumab/bevacizumab due to poor response (107 eyes), or treatment-naïve (58 eyes). Patients initially received 3-monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections followed by 2-monthly fixed doses. Clinic visits were scheduled at month 0, 4, 10 and 12. Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) from baseline were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The proportion of patients maintaining BCVA (<15 letters loss) at 12mo was also evaluated. RESULTS: Mean BCVA change at month 12 was +3.29 and +4.67 letters in the switched and naïve aflibercept groups respectively (P<0.01). BCVA was maintained in 95.3% of switched and 96.6% of naïve patients. CRT at month 12 showed a decrease of -6.16 µm in the switched group and -35.36 µm in the naïve group (P<0.01). Patients previously treated with ranibizumab/bevacizumab had on average received 7.4 ranibizumab/bevacizumab injections over 12.6mo, attending 10 clinic visits. The fixed dosing aflibercept regimen required an average of 7.1 injections (naïve group), 7.5 injections (switched group) and 4 clinic visits per year. CONCLUSION: Fixed bimonthly aflibercept is effective in both treatment-naïve and poorly responsive nvAMD patients. Adopting a fixed dosing regimen can reduce patient burden without compromising on outcomes.
Authors: David M Brown; Peter K Kaiser; Mark Michels; Gisele Soubrane; Jeffrey S Heier; Robert Y Kim; Judy P Sy; Susan Schneider Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Wyatt B Messenger; J Peter Campbell; Ambar Faridi; Loton Shippey; Steven T Bailey; Andreas K Lauer; Christina J Flaxel; Thomas S Hwang Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Cheryl A Arcinue; Feiyan Ma; Giulio Barteselli; Lucie Sharpsten; Maria Laura Gomez; William R Freeman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Geeta A Lalwani; Philip J Rosenfeld; Anne E Fung; Sander R Dubovy; Stephen Michels; William Feuer; Janet L Davis; Harry W Flynn; Maria Esquiabro Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-04-18 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Magda Gharbiya; Ludovico Iannetti; Francesco Parisi; Umberto De Vico; Maria Laura Mungo; Marco Marenco Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Nicolas Feltgen; Thomas Bertelmann; Mirko Bretag; Sebastian Pfeiffer; Reinhard Hilgers; Josep Callizo; Lena Goldammer; Sebastian Bemme; Hans Hoerauf Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Theodoros Empeslidis; Matthew Storey; Theodoros Giannopoulos; Vassileios Konidaris; Paris G Tranos; Evangelia S Panagiotou; Irini C Voudouragkaki; Anastasios G Konstas Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Vincent Daien; Robert P Finger; James S Talks; Paul Mitchell; Tien Y Wong; Taiji Sakamoto; Bora M Eldem; Jean-François Korobelnik Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 4.638