Literature DB >> 25390870

Immediate versus early loading of mini-implants supporting mandibular overdentures: a preliminary 3-year clinical outcome report.

Waleed Hamed Maryod, Samer Mostafa Ali, Ahmad Fathalla Shawky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this preliminary clinical report was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of immediate and early loaded mini-implants (MIs) supporting mandibular overdentures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six completely edentulous patients (20 men and 16 women) complaining of insufficient retention of their mandibular dentures were randomly assigned to two groups. Each patient received four MIs in the interforaminal area of the mandible using the nonsubmerged flapless surgical approach. In group 1 (G1), MIs were loaded with mandibular overdentures using the immediate loading protocol, while in group 2 (G2), MIs were loaded with overdentures using the early loading protocol. The cumulative survival rate was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Peri-implant health indices (Plaque Index/Bleeding Index), probing depths, and marginal bone levels were recorded for both groups after MI insertions and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months thereafter.
RESULTS: The cumulative implant survival rates were 91.7% and 96.7% for G1 and G2, respectively. G1 recorded significantly higher Plaque Index, Bleeding Index, and probing depths than G2 after 12 months, while other observation times demonstrated no significant difference between groups. Most of the recorded marginal bone loss occurred in the first year, and no significant bone loss was noted in subsequent years. After 6 months, marginal bone loss was significantly higher in G1 compared to G2, but no significant differences between groups were noted thereafter.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study's research design and duration of follow-up outcome analyses, immediate and early loading protocols showed good clinical results with favorable peri-implant tissue response 3 years after implant insertion. Early loading of MIs supporting a mandibular overdenture appears to be preferable to immediate loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25390870     DOI: 10.11607/ijp.3845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  6 in total

Review 1.  Implant loss and crestal bone loss in early loading versus delayed and immediate loading in edentulous mandibles. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Beatriz Pardal-Peláez; Javier Flores-Fraile; José-Luis Pardal-Refoyo; Javier Montero
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-04-01

2.  Immediate versus delayed loading of strategic mini dental implants for the stabilization of partial removable dental prostheses: a patient cluster randomized, parallel-group 3-year trial.

Authors:  Torsten Mundt; Ahmad Al Jaghsi; Bernd Schwahn; Janina Hilgert; Christian Lucas; Reiner Biffar; Christian Schwahn; Friedhelm Heinemann
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Early Loaded Single Implant Reinforced Mandibular Overdenture.

Authors:  K Nischal; R Chowdhary
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-06-14

4.  Comparison of Three Prosthodontic Treatment Modalities for Patients with Periodontally Compromised Anterior Mandibular Teeth: A 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Asja Čelebić; Sanja Peršić; Ines Kovačić; Dino Buković; Nikolina Lešić; Ksenija Rener-Sitar
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2019-03

Review 5.  Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations.

Authors:  Jennifer Zimmermann; Melanie Sommer; Leticia Grize; Stefan Stubinger
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2019-07-16

6.  Prosthetic rehabilitation of maxillary lateral incisors agenesis using dental mini-implants: a multicenter 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  M Lacarbonara; A P Cazzolla; V Lacarbonara; L Lo Muzio; D Ciavarella; N F Testa; V Crincoli; D Di Venere; A De Franco; D Tripodi; F R Grassi; M Capogreco
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.