Literature DB >> 25390195

The impact of musicianship on the cortical mechanisms related to separating speech from background noise.

Benjamin Rich Zendel1, Charles-David Tremblay, Sylvie Belleville, Isabelle Peretz.   

Abstract

Musicians have enhanced auditory processing abilities. In some studies, these abilities are paralleled by an improved understanding of speech in noisy environments, partially due to more robust encoding of speech signals in noise at the level of the brainstem. Little is known about the impact of musicianship on attention-dependent cortical activity related to lexical access during a speech-in-noise task. To address this issue, we presented musicians and nonmusicians with single words mixed with three levels of background noise, across two conditions, while monitoring electrical brain activity. In the active condition, listeners repeated the words aloud, and in the passive condition, they ignored the words and watched a silent film. When background noise was most intense, musicians repeated more words correctly compared with nonmusicians. Auditory evoked responses were attenuated and delayed with the addition of background noise. In musicians, P1 amplitude was marginally enhanced during active listening and was related to task performance in the most difficult listening condition. By comparing ERPs from the active and passive conditions, we isolated an N400 related to lexical access. The amplitude of the N400 was not influenced by the level of background noise in musicians, whereas N400 amplitude increased with the level of background noise in nonmusicians. In nonmusicians, the increase in N400 amplitude was related to a reduction in task performance. In musicians only, there was a rightward shift of the sources contributing to the N400 as the level of background noise increased. This pattern of results supports the hypothesis that encoding of speech in noise is more robust in musicians and suggests that this facilitates lexical access. Moreover, the shift in sources suggests that musicians, to a greater extent than nonmusicians, may increasingly rely on acoustic cues to understand speech in noise.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25390195     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.

Authors:  Jessica Yoo; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Musical training sharpens and bonds ears and tongue to hear speech better.

Authors:  Yi Du; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The role of rhythm in perceiving speech in noise: a comparison of percussionists, vocalists and non-musicians.

Authors:  Jessica Slater; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-10-07

4.  Assessing Top-Down and Bottom-Up Contributions to Auditory Stream Segregation and Integration With Polyphonic Music.

Authors:  Niels R Disbergen; Giancarlo Valente; Elia Formisano; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Short-Term Choir Singing Supports Speech-in-Noise Perception and Neural Pitch Strength in Older Adults With Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Ella Dubinsky; Emily A Wood; Gabriel Nespoli; Frank A Russo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Age-Related Differences in Early Cortical Representations of Target Speech Masked by Either Steady-State Noise or Competing Speech.

Authors:  Bruce A Schneider; Cristina Rabaglia; Meital Avivi-Reich; Dena Krieger; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-04

7.  Skilled musicians are not subject to the McGurk effect.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Gemma Massetti; Ezia Rizzi; Alberto Zani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Musical Sophistication and Speech Auditory-Motor Coupling: Easy Tests for Quick Answers.

Authors:  Johanna M Rimmele; Pius Kern; Christina Lubinus; Klaus Frieler; David Poeppel; M Florencia Assaneo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.