Boris J Bajaire1, Elena Oudovitchenko, Andrés E Salguero, Diego F Paipilla. 1. *Department of Vitreous and Retina, San Martin University, Sociedad de Cirugía Ocular, Bogota, Colombia †Hospital Simon Bolívar, Bogota, Colombia ‡Electrical Engineering Department, Javeriana University, Bogotá, Colombia §Department of Vitreous and Retina, San Martin University, Bogota, Colombia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: At present, the number of clinical indications for the use of silicone oil (SO) has increased in intraocular surgery because of the advent of new techniques in vitreoretinal surgery, availability of better quality oils, and greater experience in its use. Consequently, the number of procedures for SO removal has increased, and support technologies for these procedures are always a concern. METHODS: A simple active technique for SO removal based on a 5-mL standard syringe with an 18G cannula was developed. The oil is suctioned into the syringe by the pulling effect of a spring assembled along the axis of the piston. No abrupt change in the intraocular pressure is produced because of the oil viscosity and the reduced diameter of the cannula. RESULTS: A technique for SO removal that has been used successfully during the past 7 years is presented in this article. During the 7-year period, 234 SO removals were performed without any complication or device failure. Using the present method, the average time for SO removal was 4 minutes. CONCLUSION: The average extraction time with the technique is 4 minutes, which is in the range of other active techniques, and it is faster than passive methods that are performed between 8 and 9 minutes. The technique is in line with the advantages of more elaborated active methods without using complex technology. It is considered to be highly successful and easy to implement.
PURPOSE: At present, the number of clinical indications for the use of silicone oil (SO) has increased in intraocular surgery because of the advent of new techniques in vitreoretinal surgery, availability of better quality oils, and greater experience in its use. Consequently, the number of procedures for SO removal has increased, and support technologies for these procedures are always a concern. METHODS: A simple active technique for SO removal based on a 5-mL standard syringe with an 18G cannula was developed. The oil is suctioned into the syringe by the pulling effect of a spring assembled along the axis of the piston. No abrupt change in the intraocular pressure is produced because of the oil viscosity and the reduced diameter of the cannula. RESULTS: A technique for SO removal that has been used successfully during the past 7 years is presented in this article. During the 7-year period, 234 SO removals were performed without any complication or device failure. Using the present method, the average time for SO removal was 4 minutes. CONCLUSION: The average extraction time with the technique is 4 minutes, which is in the range of other active techniques, and it is faster than passive methods that are performed between 8 and 9 minutes. The technique is in line with the advantages of more elaborated active methods without using complex technology. It is considered to be highly successful and easy to implement.