Literature DB >> 25389571

Specific ion and buffer effects on protein-protein interactions of a monoclonal antibody.

D Roberts1, R Keeling, M Tracka, C F van der Walle, S Uddin, J Warwicker, R Curtis.   

Abstract

Better predictive ability of salt and buffer effects on protein-protein interactions requires separating out contributions due to ionic screening, protein charge neutralization by ion binding, and salting-in(out) behavior. We have carried out a systematic study by measuring protein-protein interactions for a monoclonal antibody over an ionic strength range of 25 to 525 mM at 4 pH values (5, 6.5, 8, and 9) in solutions containing sodium chloride, calcium chloride, sodium sulfate, or sodium thiocyante. The salt ions are chosen so as to represent a range of affinities for protein charged and noncharged groups. The results are compared to effects of various buffers including acetate, citrate, phosphate, histidine, succinate, or tris. In low ionic strength solutions, anion binding affinity is reflected by the ability to reduce protein-protein repulsion, which follows the order thiocyanate > sulfate > chloride. The sulfate specific effect is screened at the same ionic strength required to screen the pH dependence of protein-protein interactions indicating sulfate binding only neutralizes protein charged groups. Thiocyanate specific effects occur over a larger ionic strength range reflecting adsorption to charged and noncharged regions of the protein. The latter leads to salting-in behavior and, at low pH, a nonmonotonic interaction profile with respect to sodium thiocyanate concentration. The effects of thiocyanate can not be rationalized in terms of only neutralizing double layer forces indicating the presence of an additional short-ranged protein-protein attraction at moderate ionic strength. Conversely, buffer specific effects can be explained through a charge neutralization mechanism, where buffers with greater valency are more effective at reducing double layer forces at low pH. Citrate binding at pH 6.5 leads to protein charge inversion and the formation of attractive electrostatic interactions. Throughout the report, we highlight similarities in the measured protein-protein interaction profiles with previous studies of globular proteins and of antibodies providing evidence that the behavior will be common to other protein systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hofmeister; monoclonal antibody; protein−protein interactions; second virial coefficients; specific ion effects; thiocyanate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25389571     DOI: 10.1021/mp500533c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   4.939


  24 in total

1.  Preferential interactions of trehalose, L-arginine.HCl and sodium chloride with therapeutically relevant IgG1 monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Chaitanya Sudrik; Theresa Cloutier; Phuong Pham; Hardeep S Samra; Bernhardt L Trout
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Weak IgG self- and hetero-association characterized by fluorescence analytical ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  Danlin Yang; John J Correia; Walter F Stafford Iii; Christopher J Roberts; Sanjaya Singh; David Hayes; Rachel Kroe-Barrett; Andrew Nixon; Thomas M Laue
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Stability and Biological Activity of E. coli Derived Soluble and Precipitated Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2.

Authors:  Bastian Quaas; Laura Burmeister; Zhaopeng Li; Alexandra Satalov; Peter Behrens; Andrea Hoffmann; Ursula Rinas
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Recent applications of light scattering measurement in the biological and biopharmaceutical sciences.

Authors:  Allen P Minton
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Antibody adsorption on the surface of water studied by neutron reflection.

Authors:  Charles Smith; Zongyi Li; Robert Holman; Fang Pan; Richard A Campbell; Mario Campana; Peixun Li; John R P Webster; Steven Bishop; Rojaramani Narwal; Shahid Uddin; Christopher F van der Walle; Jian R Lu
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.857

6.  Theory for the Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in Aqueous Antibody Solutions.

Authors:  Miha Kastelic; Vojko Vlachy
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Mechanisms of precipitate formation during the purification of an Fc-fusion protein.

Authors:  Daniel G Greene; Steven J Traylor; Jing Guo; Leila H Choe; Shannon Modla; Xuankuo Xu; Nripen Singh; Lye Lin Lock; Sanchayita Ghose; Zheng Jian Li; Kelvin H Lee; Norman J Wagner; Abraham M Lenhoff
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Collagen Film Activation with Nanoscale IKVAV-Capped Dendrimers for Selective Neural Cell Response.

Authors:  Jessica J Kim; Daniel V Bax; Robert Murphy; Serena M Best; Ruth E Cameron
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.076

9.  The effects of arginine glutamate, a promising excipient for protein formulation, on cell viability: Comparisons with NaCl.

Authors:  Priscilla Kheddo; Alexander P Golovanov; Kieran T Mellody; Shahid Uddin; Christopher F van der Walle; Rebecca J Dearman
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Characterizing monoclonal antibody formulations in arginine glutamate solutions using 1H NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Priscilla Kheddo; Matthew J Cliff; Shahid Uddin; Christopher F van der Walle; Alexander P Golovanov
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.