Literature DB >> 25388831

[Respect for self-determination and use of coercion in the treatment of mentally ill persons: an ethical position statement of the DGPPN].

.   

Abstract

Respect for patient self-determination is a central ethical principle of medical care. Every person has the right to make decisions regarding his or her health autonomously, even if these decisions appear irrational to third parties. Free and informed consent is the necessary prerequisite for every diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. A patient's ability for self-determination is one requirement for valid consent. In illness, the ability for self-determination may be limited or absent in individual cases. An ethical dilemma arises if severely ill patients who are unable to make autonomous decisions put their health at significant risk and refuse medical procedures in this situation. While non-treatment can be severely detrimental to health, forced procedures can result in traumatization and can damage the relationship of trust between the doctor and patient. The dilemma is intensified in cases of danger to others. In these difficult situations doctors, therapists and nursing staff require ethical guidance for the professional conduct. The primary objective thereby is to avoid coercion. For this purpose recommendations for medical practice are formulated that can reduce the use of forced procedures (e.g. de-escalation procedures, communication competency, clinical ethics counseling, treatment agreements and patient living wills) or if they are unavoidable, that allow them to be conducted in an ethically and legally appropriate way. Further and continued education must pay greater attention to this ethical objective; therefore, for ethical reasons adequate personnel, spatial and structural are vital in hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25388831     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-014-4202-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  16 in total

1.  EPA guidance on improving the image of psychiatry.

Authors:  A M Möller-Leimkühler; H-J Möller; W Maier; W Gaebel; P Falkai
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  [Coercive measures in German hospitals for psychiatry and psychotherapy : A pilot study by the DGPPN to evaluate a uniform assessment instrument].

Authors:  K Adorjan; T Steinert; E Flammer; A Deister; M Koller; M Zinkler; S C Herpertz; S Häfner; F Hohl-Radke; K H Beine; P Falkai; G Gerlinger; O Pogarell; T Pollmächer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  [Psychiatrists between oath to secrecy and duty to warn].

Authors:  H Helmchen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Subjective experience of coercion in psychiatric care: a study comparing the attitudes of patients and healthy volunteers towards coercive methods and their justification.

Authors:  J Mielau; J Altunbay; J Gallinat; A Heinz; F Bermpohl; A Lehmann; C Montag
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  [Single or double moral standards? Professional ethics of psychiatrists regarding self-determination, rights of third parties and involuntary treatment].

Authors:  T Pollmächer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 6.  [Impact of the Zeitgeist and human rights on psychiatric actions].

Authors:  Hanfried Helmchen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.214

7.  [Core principles for the regulation of placement subject to public law in psychiatric hospitals - with explanations].

Authors: 
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  Seclusion as a coercive measure in suicidality - daily routine or exception?

Authors:  Natalija Gavrilovic Haustein; Maurice Freudiger; Anna Hunziker; Urs Hepp; Lena Jellestad; Roland von Känel; Niklaus Stulz
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.144

9.  Requirements for the implementation of open door policies in acute psychiatry from a mental health professionals' and patients' view: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  J Kalagi; I Otte; J Vollmann; G Juckel; J Gather
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating an evidence-based, stepped and coordinated care service model for mental disorders (RECOVER).

Authors:  Martin Lambert; Anne Karow; Jürgen Gallinat; Daniel Lüdecke; Vivien Kraft; Anja Rohenkohl; Romy Schröter; Constanze Finter; Anna-Katharina Siem; Lisa Tlach; Nathalie Werkle; Susann Bargel; Gunda Ohm; Martin Hoff; Helmut Peter; Martin Scherer; Claudia Mews; Susanne Pruskil; Johannes Lüke; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier; Michael Schulte-Markwort; Bernd Löwe; Peer Briken; Heike Peper; Michael Schweiger; Mike Mösko; Thomas Bock; Martin Wittzack; Hans-Jochim Meyer; Arno Deister; Rolf Michels; Stephanie Herr; Alexander Konnopka; Hannah König; Karl Wegscheider; Anne Daubmann; Antonia Zapf; Judith Peth; Hans-Helmut König; Holger Schulz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.