Literature DB >> 26874959

EPA guidance on improving the image of psychiatry.

A M Möller-Leimkühler1, H-J Möller2, W Maier3, W Gaebel4, P Falkai5.   

Abstract

This paper explores causes, explanations and consequences of the negative image of psychiatry and develops recommendations for improvement. It is primarily based on a WPA guidance paper on how to combat the stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists and a Medline search on related publications since 2010. Furthermore, focussing on potential causes and explanations, the authors performed a selective literature search regarding additional image-related issues such as mental health literacy and diagnostic and treatment issues. Underestimation of psychiatry results from both unjustified prejudices of the general public, mass media and healthcare professionals and psychiatry's own unfavourable coping with external and internal concerns. Issues related to unjustified devaluation of psychiatry include overestimation of coercion, associative stigma, lack of public knowledge, need to simplify complex mental issues, problem of the continuum between normality and psychopathology, competition with medical and non-medical disciplines and psychopharmacological treatment. Issues related to psychiatry's own contribution to being underestimated include lack of a clear professional identity, lack of biomarkers supporting clinical diagnoses, limited consensus about best treatment options, lack of collaboration with other medical disciplines and low recruitment rates among medical students. Recommendations are proposed for creating and representing a positive self-concept with different components. The negative image of psychiatry is not only due to unfavourable communication with the media, but is basically a problem of self-conceptualization. Much can be improved. However, psychiatry will remain a profession with an exceptional position among the medical disciplines, which should be seen as its specific strength.

Keywords:  Biopsychosocial models; Professional identity; Recruitment of medical students; Self-marketing; Self-stigma; Stigma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26874959     DOI: 10.1007/s00406-016-0678-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0940-1334            Impact factor:   5.270


  104 in total

1.  Selling sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease mongering.

Authors:  Ray Moynihan; Iona Heath; David Henry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-13

2.  Recruitment problems in psychiatry: just a matter of more exposition?

Authors:  Lars Søndergård
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.392

3.  Premature death among people with mental illness.

Authors:  Graham Thornicroft
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-14

4.  Perspective: Upcoming paradigm shifts for psychiatry in clinical care, research, and education.

Authors:  Eugene H Rubin; Charles F Zorumski
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Preliminary study of associative stigma among trainee psychiatrists in Flanders, Belgium.

Authors:  Kirsten Catthoor; Joost Hutsebaut; Didier Schrijvers; Marc De Hert; Jozef Peuskens; Bernard Sabbe
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-09-22

6.  The demonisation of psychiatrists in fiction (and why real psychiatrists might want to do something about it).

Authors:  Jacqueline Hopson
Journal:  Psychiatr Bull (2014)       Date:  2014-08

7.  Aspects of Sustainability: Cooperation, Job Satisfaction, and Burnout among Swiss Psychiatrists.

Authors:  Johanna Baumgardt; Jörn Moock; Wulf Rössler; Wolfram Kawohl
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2015-02-11

8.  No role for initial severity on the efficacy of antidepressants: results of a multi-meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Melina Siamouli; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Progressive brain changes in schizophrenia related to antipsychotic treatment? A meta-analysis of longitudinal MRI studies.

Authors:  P Fusar-Poli; R Smieskova; M J Kempton; B C Ho; N C Andreasen; S Borgwardt
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Why medical students choose psychiatry - a 20 country cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Kitty Farooq; Gregory J Lydall; Amit Malik; David M Ndetei; Dinesh Bhugra
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  7 in total

1.  The EPA guidance document series.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gaebel
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Public attitudes towards psychiatry and psychiatric treatment at the beginning of the 21st century: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys.

Authors:  Matthias C Angermeyer; Sandra van der Auwera; Mauro G Carta; Georg Schomerus
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Stigma towards mental illness and help-seeking behaviors among adult and child psychiatrists in Hungary: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Dorottya Őri; Péter Szocsics; Tamás Molnár; Fanni Virág Ralovich; Zsolt Huszár; Ágnes Bene; Sándor Rózsa; Zsuzsa Győrffy; György Purebl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Predicting Medical Students' Current Attitudes Toward Psychiatry, Interest in Psychiatry, and Estimated Likelihood of Working in Psychiatry: A Cross-Sectional Study in Four European Countries.

Authors:  Ingeborg Warnke; Alex Gamma; Maria Buadze; Roman Schleifer; Carlos Canela; Bernd Strebel; Tamás Tényi; Wulf Rössler; Nicolas Rüsch; Michael Liebrenz
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Associative stigma among mental health professionals in Singapore: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Louisa Picco; Sherilyn Chang; Edimansyah Abdin; Boon Yiang Chua; Qi Yuan; Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar; Samantha Ong; Kah Lai Yow; Hong Choon Chua; Siow Ann Chong; Mythily Subramaniam
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Effectiveness of incentives and follow-up on increasing survey response rates and participation in field studies.

Authors:  Michael G Smith; Maryam Witte; Sarah Rocha; Mathias Basner
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Compulsory admissions of patients with mental disorders: State of the art on ethical and legislative aspects in 40 European countries.

Authors:  D Wasserman; G Apter; C Baeken; S Bailey; J Balazs; C Bec; P Bienkowski; J Bobes; M F Bravo Ortiz; H Brunn; Ö Bôke; N Camilleri; B Carpiniello; J Chihai; E Chkonia; P Courtet; D Cozman; M David; G Dom; A Esanu; P Falkai; W Flannery; K Gasparyan; G Gerlinger; P Gorwood; O Gudmundsson; C Hanon; A Heinz; M J Heitor Dos Santos; A Hedlund; F Ismayilov; N Ismayilov; E T Isometsä; L Izakova; A Kleinberg; T Kurimay; S Klæbo Reitan; D Lecic-Tosevski; A Lehmets; N Lindberg; K A Lundblad; G Lynch; C Maddock; U F Malt; L Martin; I Martynikhin; N O Maruta; F Matthys; R Mazaliauskiene; G Mihajlovic; A Mihaljevic Peles; V Miklavic; P Mohr; M Munarriz Ferrandis; M Musalek; N Neznanov; G Ostorharics-Horvath; I Pajević; A Popova; P Pregelj; E Prinsen; C Rados; A Roig; M Rojnic Kuzman; J Samochowiec; N Sartorius; Y Savenko; O Skugarevsky; E Slodecki; A Soghoyan; D S Stone; R Taylor-East; E Terauds; C Tsopelas; C Tudose; S Tyano; P Vallon; R J Van der Gaag; P Varandas; L Vavrusova; P Voloshyn; J Wancata; J Wise; Z Zemishlany; F Öncü; S Vahip
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.361

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.