| Literature DB >> 25386313 |
Lisbeth Jensen1, Anette Stensgaard1, Klaus Ejner Andersen1.
Abstract
Chronic eczematous hand dermatoses with and without contact allergies are complex diseases, which makes it a challenge to select the best treatment and obtain an optimal patient experience and a satisfactory treatment result. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the clinical effect and patient experience of local treatment with psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) soaks and TL01 phototherapy for severe chronic hand dermatoses, and also to evaluate the quality of life for the subgroup of patients with allergic contact dermatitis including Compositae allergy. A retrospective evaluation of results for 94 consecutive patients having received a total of 121 treatment courses with local PUVA soaks or TL01 phototherapy for one of the following diagnoses (n=number of treatment courses): psoriasis (n=19), hyperk-eratotic hand eczema (n=27), Pustulosis Palmoplantaris (PPP) (n=22), vesicular eczema (n=16), Compositae dermatitis (n=24), and allergic contact dermatitis (n=13). Moreover, semi-structured interviews with 6 selected patients having multiple contact allergies including Compositae allergy were used to evaluate quality of life. As a result, we found that PUVA soaks has good effect in patients with psoriasis and hyperkeratotic hand eczema and local phototherapy for chronic hand dermatoses is a useful treatment option in selected cases.Entities:
Keywords: PUVA soaks; compositae allergy.; hand eczema; quality of life
Year: 2012 PMID: 25386313 PMCID: PMC4212663 DOI: 10.4081/dr.2012.e3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dermatol Reports ISSN: 2036-7392
Patient distribution regarding sex, age, number of treatments in one course, single, and cumulative doses of UVA for each diagnosis. (J=Joule/cm2)
| Psoriasis | Hyperkeratotic eczema | Pustulosis palmoplantaris | Vesicular eczema | Allergic contact dermatitis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women | 5 | 10 | 16 | 9 | 18 | 7 |
| Men | 8 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| Range | 29-82 | 34-74 | 39-76 | 29-57 | 46-79 | 33-69 |
| Median | 57 | 52 | 59 | 46.5 | 54.5 | 51 |
| Range | 13-35 | 10-33 | 14-33 | 10-46 | 10-37 | 10-33 |
| Median | 21 | 23 | 22 | 22 | 15 | 20 |
| Range | 0.65-1.20 J | 0.35-1.20 J | 0.65-1.20 J | 0.40-1.20 J | 0.35-1.20 J | 0.45-1.10 J |
| Median | 1.05 J | 1.10 J | 0.90 J | 0.83 J | 0.65 J | 0.85 J |
| Range | 4.85-23.70J | 2.35-26.40J | 5.95-19.85J | 2.07-39.20J | 2.70-28.48J | 3.85-13.45J |
| Median | 13.45 J | 13.70 J | 12.30 J | 10.45 J | 5.53 J | 10.76 J |
Figure 1Good effect (effect 4, 3) and inadequate effect (effect 2, 1, 0) of PUVA soaks, TL01, and both treatment modalities together. Number of treatment courses stated.
Figure 2Effect of both treatment modalities divided on diagnoses. Good effect (effect 4, 3) and inadequate effect (effect 2, 1, 0). Number of treatment courses stated.
Figure 3Good and inadequate effect of PUVA soaks and TL01 shown for each diagnosis. Number of treatment courses stated.