Literature DB >> 25386061

Current status of laparoscopy for the treatment of rectal cancer.

Noam Shussman1, Steven D Wexner1.   

Abstract

Surgery for rectal cancer in complex and entails many challenges. While the laparoscopic approach in general and specific to colon cancer has been long proven to have short term benefits and to be oncologically safe, it is still a debatable topic for rectal cancer. The attempt to benefit rectal cancer patients with the known advantages of the laparoscopic approach while not compromising their oncologic outcome has led to the conduction of many studies during the past decade. Herein we describe our technique for laparoscopic proctectomy and assess the current literature dealing with short term outcomes, immediate oncologic measures (such as lymph node yield and specimen quality) and long term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. We also briefly evaluate the evolving issues of robotic assisted rectal cancer surgery and the current innovations and trends in the minimally invasive approach to rectal cancer surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Oncological outcomes; Rectal cancer; Short term benefits

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25386061      PMCID: PMC4223246          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  52 in total

1.  Laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  R T Schlinkert
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  M Morino; M E Allaix; G Giraudo; F Corno; C Garrone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.

Authors:  Ilmo H Kellokumpu; Matti I Kairaluoma; Kyösti P Nuorva; Hannu J Kautiainen; Ismo T Jantunen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Heald; R D Ryall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  H Nelson; N Petrelli; A Carlin; J Couture; J Fleshman; J Guillem; B Miedema; D Ota; D Sargent
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

7.  Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Dan J Virnig; David A Rothenberger; Arden M Morris; Jose Jessurun; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Authors:  W Schwenk; O Haase; J Neudecker; J M Müller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20
View more
  6 in total

1.  Using psychological interventions in the nursing care of rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Sumin Wang; Huiqian Tian; Rongrong Xue
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Expression of chemokine receptor CXCR7 in colorectal carcinoma and its prognostic significance.

Authors:  Dan Yang; Tingting Dai; Lijun Xue; Xiaobei Liu; Bo Wu; Jian Geng; Xiaobei Mao; Rui Wang; Longbang Chen; Xiaoyuan Chu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-10-01

3.  National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gabriel; Pragatheeshwar Thirunavukarasu; Eisar Al-Sukhni; Kristopher Attwood; Steven J Nurkin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Outcomes and Morbidity.

Authors:  James P Taylor; Miloslawa Stem; Azah A Althumairi; Susan L Gearhart; Bashar Safar; Sandy H Fang; Jonathan E Efron
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  High expression of GPR116 indicates poor survival outcome and promotes tumor progression in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Li Yang; Xiao-Lu Lin; Wei Liang; Seng-Wang Fu; Wen-Feng Lin; Xiao-Qing Tian; Yun-Jie Gao; Hao-Yan Chen; Jun Dai; Zhi-Zheng Ge
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18

6.  Laparoscopic assisted low anterior resection for advanced rectal cancer in a kidney transplant recipient: A case report.

Authors:  Zenan Xia; Weijie Chen; Ru Yao; Guole Lin; Huizhong Qiu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.