Nadra E Lisha1, Kevin L Delucchi2, Pamela M Ling1, Danielle E Ramo3. 1. Department of Medicine, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA danielle.ramo@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Social smoking is an increasingly common pattern among emerging adults. Although distinct patterns have emerged between social smokers and non-social smokers, there is discrepancy about how to define the construct, with inconsistencies between self-identified social smoking and behavioral social smoking. We report prevalence and correlates of young adult smokers who self-identify and behave as social smokers (SELF + BEH), self-identified non-behavioral social smokers (SELF-ONLY), and non-social smokers (NON-SOCIAL). METHODS: Young adults age 18-25 years who have smoked at least 1 cigarette in the past 30 days (N = 1,811) were recruited through Facebook for a national anonymous, online survey of tobacco and other substance use. Three social smoking items were used to categorize respondents into 1 of 3 smoking groups. Groups were examined for prevalence and differences on demographics, substance use, motivation to quit smoking and thoughts about tobacco abstinence. RESULTS: SELF-ONLY (46%) was the largest group, followed by SELF + BEH (27%) and NON-SOCIAL (27%). SELF + BEH smoke less frequently, smoke fewer cigarettes per day, are less addicted to cigarettes, have a higher desire to quit, and perceive a lower quitting difficulty compared with SELF-ONLY. SELF + BEH and SELF-ONLY were more likely to be male, be marijuana users, and be addicted to marijuana than NON-SOCIAL. SELF + BEH exhibited a lower frequency of smoking, less cigarettes per day, were less addicted, and had more days co-using alcohol and cigarettes than NON-SOCIAL. CONCLUSION: Identifying social smokers based on self-identification in addition to behavioral components appears to be important for designing smoking cessation interventions for emerging adults.
INTRODUCTION: Social smoking is an increasingly common pattern among emerging adults. Although distinct patterns have emerged between social smokers and non-social smokers, there is discrepancy about how to define the construct, with inconsistencies between self-identified social smoking and behavioral social smoking. We report prevalence and correlates of young adult smokers who self-identify and behave as social smokers (SELF + BEH), self-identified non-behavioral social smokers (SELF-ONLY), and non-social smokers (NON-SOCIAL). METHODS: Young adults age 18-25 years who have smoked at least 1 cigarette in the past 30 days (N = 1,811) were recruited through Facebook for a national anonymous, online survey of tobacco and other substance use. Three social smoking items were used to categorize respondents into 1 of 3 smoking groups. Groups were examined for prevalence and differences on demographics, substance use, motivation to quit smoking and thoughts about tobacco abstinence. RESULTS: SELF-ONLY (46%) was the largest group, followed by SELF + BEH (27%) and NON-SOCIAL (27%). SELF + BEH smoke less frequently, smoke fewer cigarettes per day, are less addicted to cigarettes, have a higher desire to quit, and perceive a lower quitting difficulty compared with SELF-ONLY. SELF + BEH and SELF-ONLY were more likely to be male, be marijuana users, and be addicted to marijuana than NON-SOCIAL. SELF + BEH exhibited a lower frequency of smoking, less cigarettes per day, were less addicted, and had more days co-using alcohol and cigarettes than NON-SOCIAL. CONCLUSION: Identifying social smokers based on self-identification in addition to behavioral components appears to be important for designing smoking cessation interventions for emerging adults.
Authors: Chris R E Coggins; E Lenn Murrelle; Richard A Carchman; Christian Heidbreder Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2009-10-03 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Amanda L Johnson; Jessica M Rath; Valerie Williams; Donna M Vallone; David B Abrams; Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Saul Shiffman; Xiaoxue Li; Michael S Dunbar; Stuart G Ferguson; Hilary A Tindle; Sarah M Scholl Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Diann E Gaalema; Jennifer W Tidey; Allison N Kurti; Stacey C Sigmon; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Danielle E Ramo; Manpreet Kaur; Ella S Corpuz; Derek D Satre; Kevin Delucchi; Sandra A Brown; Judith J Prochaska Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-03-03 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Elpidio Maria Garzillo; Maria Grazia Lourdes Monaco; Anna Rita Corvino; Alessia Giardiello; Antonio Arnese; Francesco Napolitano; Gabriella Di Giuseppe; Monica Lamberti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-27 Impact factor: 4.614