Literature DB >> 25385049

Analysis of hip range of motion in everyday life: a pilot study.

Caecilia Charbonnier1, Sylvain Chagué, Jérôme Schmid, Frank C Kolo, Massimiliano Bernardoni, Panayiotis Christofilopoulos.   

Abstract

Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty are increasingly younger and have a higher demand concerning hip range of motion. To date, there is no clear consensus as to the amplitude of the "normal hip" in everyday life. It is also unknown if the physical examination is an accurate test for setting the values of true hip motion. The purpose of this study was: 1) to precisely determine the necessary hip joint mobility for everyday tasks in young active subjects to be used in computer simulations of prosthetic models in order to evaluate impingement and instability during their practice; 2) to assess the accuracy of passive hip range of motion measurements during clinical examination. A total of 4 healthy volunteers underwent Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 2 motion capture experiments. During experiment 1, routine activities were recorded and applied to prosthetic hip 3D models including nine cup configurations. During experiment 2, a clinical examination was performed, while the motion of the subjects was simultaneously captured. Important hip flexion (mean range 95°-107°) was measured during daily activities that could expose the prosthetic hip to impingement and instability. The error made by the clinicians during physical examination varied in the range of ±10°, except for flexion and abduction where the error was higher. This study provides useful information for the surgical planning to help restore hip mobility and stability, when dealing with young active patients. The physical examination seems to be a precise method for determining passive hip motion, if care is taken to stabilise the pelvis during hip flexion and abduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25385049     DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  8 in total

1.  MyHip: supporting planning and surgical guidance for a better total hip arthroplasty : A pilot study.

Authors:  Jérôme Schmid; Christophe Chênes; Sylvain Chagué; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Panayiotis Christofilopoulos; Massimiliano Bernardoni; Caecilia Charbonnier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Periacetabular osteotomy restores the typically excessive range of motion in dysplastic hips with a spherical head.

Authors:  Simon D Steppacher; Corinne A Zurmühle; Marc Puls; Klaus A Siebenrock; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Evidence for the therapeutic effect of the organic content in Szigetvár thermal water on osteoarthritis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Adrienn Hanzel; Károly Berényi; Krisztina Horváth; Katalin Szendi; Balázs Németh; Csaba Varga
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Delay of total hip arthroplasty to advanced stage worsens post-operative hip motion in patients with femoral head osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Woo-Lam Jo; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Tae-Young Kim; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Posterior Extra-articular Ischiofemoral Impingement Can Be Caused by the Lesser and Greater Trochanter in Patients With Increased Femoral Version: Dynamic 3D CT-Based Hip Impingement Simulation of a Modified FABER Test.

Authors:  Till D Lerch; Sébastien Zwingelstein; Florian Schmaranzer; Adam Boschung; Markus S Hanke; Inga A S Todorski; Simon D Steppacher; Nicolas Gerber; Guodong Zeng; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-28

Review 6.  Robot-aided assessment of lower extremity functions: a review.

Authors:  Serena Maggioni; Alejandro Melendez-Calderon; Edwin van Asseldonk; Verena Klamroth-Marganska; Lars Lünenburger; Robert Riener; Herman van der Kooij
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Effect of critical shoulder angle, glenoid lateralization, and humeral inclination on range of movement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Eileen Tay; Philippe Collin; Sébastien Piotton; Chih-Hao Chiu; Aude Michelet; Caecilia Charbonnier
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  Reliability of hip range of motion measurement among experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons.

Authors:  Joshua D Harris; Richard C Mather; Shane J Nho; John P Salvo; Allston J Stubbs; Geoffrey S Van Thiel; Andrew B Wolff; John J Christoforetti; Thomas J Ellis; Dean K Matsuda; Benjamin R Kivlan; Dominic S Carreira
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2019-12-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.