Literature DB >> 25384539

PACS used while on-call: a national survey of radiology program directors and chief residents.

Joseph A Tesoriero1, Paul Eddy, Anton N Hasso.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of different diagnostic image viewing platforms used by radiologists while on-call, and to assess the opinions and preferences of radiology program directors and chief residents regarding their use. An online survey was sent electronically to radiology residency program directors and chief residents via the Association of University Radiologists. Forty-two radiology program directors and 25 chief residents completed the survey, yielding response rates of 24.9 and 8.5 %, respectively. From the survey results, 10 different Picture Archiving Communications Systems (PACS) were identified; GE (25 %), Philips (17 %), and Agfa Impax (15 %) were the most prevalent. Interestingly, only 5 % of all respondents use a secondary "Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine" viewer for on-call studies. Perceptions of PACS functionality were generally neutral to weakly positive. Most respondents strongly agreed that it is important to have a single integrated PACS for viewing on-call studies and agreed that the PACS should be integrated into the Electronic Medical Records (EMR). The overwhelming majority of respondents use their institution's PACS while on-call. The results show there is still a wide variety of PACS platforms used by different institutions; however, GE, Phillips, and Agfa were some of the most prevalent. Most radiologists surveyed have neutral to slightly positive perceptions about the functionality and ease of use of their PACS. Finally, while radiologists agree that PACS should be integrated with EMR, only 53 % of respondents currently have this arrangement.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25384539      PMCID: PMC4359203          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-014-9741-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  20 in total

1.  From PACS to integrated EMR.

Authors:  Osman Ratib; Michael Swiernik; J Michael McCoy
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.790

2.  Empirical investigation of radiologists' priorities for PACS selection: an analytical hierarchy process approach.

Authors:  Vivek Joshi; Kyootai Lee; David Melson; Vamsi R Narra
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  PACS direct experiences: implementation, selection, benefits realized.

Authors:  Karen Ondo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Financial assessment of a picture archiving and communication system implemented all at once.

Authors:  Ying-Chen Fang; Ming-Chin Yang; Ya-Seng Hsueh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Ten filmless years and ten lessons: a 10th-anniversary retrospective from the Baltimore VA Medical Center.

Authors:  Eliot L Siegel; Bruce I Reiner; Khan M Siddiqui
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Computer-based simulator for radiology: an educational tool.

Authors:  Alexander J Towbin; Brian E Paterson; Paul J Chang
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Catherine M DesRoches; Eric G Campbell; Karen Donelan; Sowmya R Rao; Timothy G Ferris; Alexandra Shields; Sara Rosenbaum; David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Role of multihospital system membership in electronic medical record adoption.

Authors:  Pengxiang Li; James A Bahensky; Mirou Jaana; Marcia M Ward
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun

Review 9.  SimpleDICOM suite: personal productivity tools for managing DICOM objects.

Authors:  Barton F Branstetter; Steven D Uttecht; David M Lionetti; Paul J Chang
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Radiologist assessment of PACS user interface devices.

Authors:  David L Weiss; Khan M Siddiqui; Joe Scopelliti
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.532

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantitative Evaluation of PACS Query/Retrieve Capabilities.

Authors:  Abderrazek Boufahja; Steven Nichols; Vincent Pangon
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.903

Review 2.  The Current State and Path Forward For Enterprise Image Viewing: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper.

Authors:  Christopher J Roth; Louis M Lannum; Donald K Dennison; Alexander J Towbin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.056

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.