Literature DB >> 16763930

Financial assessment of a picture archiving and communication system implemented all at once.

Ying-Chen Fang1, Ming-Chin Yang, Ya-Seng Hsueh.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the differential cost between film-based radiology and a hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS) implemented all at once. The cash flow and running costs of PACS and film-based operation were measured over an 8-year time horizon. When the hospital-wide PACS was implemented over a short period, there was instant conversion into digital film and archives. The net present value (NPV) for PACS operation is US $1,598,698, whereas the NPV for film-based operation is US $2,083,856, indicating a net saving of US $485,157. The payback period is 4 years. The costs of computed radiography and image plates account for 40% of the initial capital expenditure in PACS implementation, followed by computer hardware (30%) and software (9%) costs. Our experience shows that implementation of hospital-wide PACS all at once can produce cost savings. For hospitals intending to go filmless, this study offers a model for financial evaluation of PACS to help in decision making.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16763930      PMCID: PMC3045175          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-006-0632-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  15 in total

1.  The benefits of hospital-wide picture archiving and communication systems: a survey of clinical users of radiology services.

Authors:  S Bryan; G C Weatherburn; J R Watkins; M J Buxton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Evaluation of a hospital picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  S Bryan; G Weatherburn; M Buxton; J Watkins; J Keen; N Muris
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1999-10

3.  PACS: current status and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  R L Arenson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Filmless radiology at the Baltimore VA Medical Center: a 9 year retrospective.

Authors:  Eliot L Siegel; Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  SCAR Radiologic Technologist Survey: analysis of the impact of digital technologies on productivity.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Eliot L Siegel; John A Carrino; Mitchell M Goldburgh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Technologists' productivity when using PACS: comparison of film-based versus filmless radiography.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Eliot L Siegel
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Avoiding unread images with PACS.

Authors:  David E Avrin; Ronald L Arenson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  PACS in private practice--effect on profits and productivity.

Authors:  Lawrence Chan; Michael Trambert; Alberto Kywi; Steve Hartzman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Guidelines for cost-effective implementation of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems. An approach building on practical experiences in three European hospitals.

Authors:  E M van Gennip; J Enning; F Fischer; K H Glaser; M Kilbinger; K J Klose; E List-Hellwig; R Van der Loo; R Rechid; R Van den Broeck; B Wein
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1996-12

10.  Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.

Authors:  Katherine P Andriole
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  9 in total

1.  Picture, archiving and communication system in the Italian NHS: a primer on diffusion and evaluation analysis.

Authors:  Luca Buccoliero; Stefano Calciolari; Marta Marsilio; Elisa Mattavelli
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Virtual organization of hospital medical imaging: a user satisfaction survey.

Authors:  Claude Sicotte; Guy Paré; Kobena Kra Bini; Marie-Pierre Moreault; Guy Laverdure
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Evaluating the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems in Newfoundland and Labrador--a cost benefit analysis.

Authors:  Don MacDonald; Doreen Neville
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Issues surrounding PACS archiving to external, third-party DICOM archives.

Authors:  Steve Langer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  PACS used while on-call: a national survey of radiology program directors and chief residents.

Authors:  Joseph A Tesoriero; Paul Eddy; Anton N Hasso
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  [PACS: acceptance by orthopedic surgeons].

Authors:  M Lenhart; A Haueis; H Schneider; E-M Jung; T Herold; S Feuerbach; V Schöffl; N Zorger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Digital X-ray: interhospital data transfer by CD-ROM. Prospective data evaluation during the import process].

Authors:  S Vetter; C Hitzigrath; C Wölfl; M Hutter; P-A Grützner; C B Frank
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Determinant Factors in Applying Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) in Healthcare.

Authors:  Mohammadhiwa Abdekhoda; Kawa Mirza Salih
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2017-07-01

9.  Implementing an Integrated Large-Scale Clinical Information System for ISSSTE's Hospital Network in Mexico.

Authors:  Arturo Cervantes Trejo; Sophie Domenge Treuille; Isaac Castañeda Alcántara
Journal:  SN Compr Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.