Literature DB >> 25384302

Reducing barriers to timely MR imaging scheduling.

Brooke V Wessman1, Andrew K Moriarity, Vanda Ametlli, David J Kastan.   

Abstract

Scheduling a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging study at the authors' large health system in 2011 required considerable preparation before an appointment time was given to a patient. Difficulties in promptly scheduling appointments resulted from the varying time required for examinations, depending on the requested protocol, availability of appropriate MR imaging equipment, examination timing, prior insurance authorization verification, and proper patient screening. These factors contributed to a backlog of patients to schedule that regularly exceeded 300. A multidisciplinary process-improvement team was assembled to improve the turnaround time for scheduling an outpatient MR imaging examination (the interval between the time when the order was received and the time when the patient was informed about the MR imaging appointment). Process improvements targeted by the team included protocol turnaround time, schedule standardization, schedule intervals, examination timing, service standards, and scheduling redesign. Using lean methods and multiple plan-do-check-act cycles, the time to schedule an outpatient MR imaging examination improved from 117 hours to 33 hours, a 72% reduction, during the 9-month study period in 2011-2012. The number of patients in the scheduling queue was reduced by 90%. Overall MR imaging examinations within the specific patient population studied increased from 773 patient studies during the first month of intervention to 1444 studies the following month and averaged over 1279 patient studies per month throughout the study. ©RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25384302     DOI: 10.1148/rg.347140025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  6 in total

1.  A Comprehensive Approach Towards Quality and Safety in Diagnostic Imaging Services: Our Experience at a Rural Tertiary Health Care Center.

Authors:  Viral Patel; Geetika Sindhwani; Monica Gupta; Sweta Arora; Arpita Mishra; Jayesh Bhatt; Manali Arora; Anisha Gehani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

2.  Prognostic impact of combining whole-body PET/CT and brain PET/MR in patients with lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastases.

Authors:  Kung-Chu Ho; Cheng-Hong Toh; Shih-Hong Li; Chien-Ying Liu; Cheng-Ta Yang; Yu-Jen Lu; Tzu-Pei Su; Chih-Wei Wang; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Predictors of missed appointments in patients referred for congenital or pediatric cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Jimmy C Lu; Ray Lowery; Sunkyung Yu; Maryam Ghadimi Mahani; Prachi P Agarwal; Adam L Dorfman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-04-21

4.  Delays in Obtaining Knee MRI in Pediatric Sports Medicine: Impact of Insurance Type.

Authors:  Jennifer J Beck; Nicole West; Kylie G Shaw; Nicholas Jackson; Richard E Bowen
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  What Are the Causes and Consequences of Delayed Surgery for Pediatric Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Haley E Smith; Aristides I Cruz; R Justin Mistovich; Tomasina M Leska; Theodore J Ganley; Julien T Aoyama; Henry B Ellis; Indranil Kushare; Rushyuan J Lee; Scott D McKay; Todd A Milbrandt; Jason T Rhodes; Brant C Sachleben; Gregory A Schmale; Neeraj M Patel
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-07

6.  Improving patient flow in diagnostic imaging: a case report.

Authors:  Rebecca Jessome
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-09-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.