Literature DB >> 25384238

Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.

Aaron Veldre1, Sally Andrews1.   

Abstract

In skilled reading, the processing of an upcoming word often begins in the parafovea, that is, before the word is fixated. This study investigated whether the extraction and use of multiple sources of information about an upcoming word depends on reading skill. The eye movements of 107 skilled adult readers, assessed on measures of reading and spelling ability, were recorded. The gaze-contingent boundary paradigm was used to manipulate the preview of a target word's identity and length in sentences with low- or high-frequency pretarget words. Across all first-pass reading measures, superior reading ability was associated with a larger preview benefit, but only among readers with high spelling ability, suggesting that the orthographic precision of a reader's stored lexical representations influences the extraction of parafoveal information. There was also evidence that the highly skilled reader/spellers' parafoveal processing advantage derived partly from their efficient foveal processing. Finally, in first fixations on the target, increased preview benefit for highly skilled reader/spellers was restricted to accurate length previews, suggesting that readers with precise lexical representations use upcoming word length in combination with parafoveal orthographic information to narrow down potential lexical candidates. The implications of these results for computational models of eye movements are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25384238     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

Review 1.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

2.  Reading proficiency predicts the extent of the right, but not left, perceptual span in older readers.

Authors:  Aaron Veldre; Roslyn Wong; Sally Andrews
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Precision in the measurement of lexical expertise: the selection of optimal items for a spelling assessment.

Authors:  Michael A Eskenazi; Robert L Askew; Jocelyn R Folk
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-05

5.  Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading.

Authors:  Joshua Snell; Martijn Meeter; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An investigation of parafoveal masks with the incremental boundary paradigm.

Authors:  Florian Hutzler; Sarah Schuster; Christina Marx; Stefan Hawelka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spill the load: Mixed evidence for a foveal load effect, reliable evidence for a spillover effect in eye-movement control during reading.

Authors:  Eva Findelsberger; Florian Hutzler; Stefan Hawelka
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Mark Yates; Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-10-04

9.  Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements.

Authors:  Adam J Parker; Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.143

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.