Literature DB >> 25383509

Comparing the biological washout of β+-activity induced in mice brain after 12C-ion and proton irradiation.

C Ammar1, K Frey, J Bauer, C Melzig, S Chiblak, M Hildebrandt, D Unholtz, C Kurz, S Brons, J Debus, A Abdollahi, K Parodi.   

Abstract

In clinical ion beam therapy, protons as well as heavier ions such as carbon are used for treatment. For protons, β(+)-emitters are only induced by fragmentation reactions in the target (target fragmentation), whereas for heavy ions, they are additionally induced by fragmentations of the projectile (further referred to as autoactivation). An approach utilizing these processes for treatment verification, by comparing measured Positron Emission Tomography (PET) data to predictions from Monte Carlo simulations, has already been clinically implemented. For an accurate simulation, it is important to consider the biological washout of β(+)-emitters due to vital functions. To date, mathematical expressions for washout have mainly been determined by using radioactive beams of (10)C- and (11)C-ions, both β(+)-emitters, to enhance the counting statistics in the irradiated area. Still, the question of how the choice of projectile (autoactivating or non-autoactivating) influences the washout coefficients, has not been addressed. In this context, an experiment was carried out at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center with the purpose of directly comparing irradiation-induced biological washout coefficients in mice for protons and (12)C-ions. To this aim, mice were irradiated in the brain region with protons and (12)C-ions and measured after irradiation with a PET/CT scanner (Siemens Biograph mCT). After an appropriate waiting time, the mice were sacrificed, then irradiated and measured again under similar conditions. The resulting data were processed and fitted numerically to deduce the main washout parameters. Despite the very low PET counting statistics, a consistent difference could be identified between (12)C-ion and proton irradiated mice, with the (12)C data being described best by a two component fit with a combined medium and slow washout fraction of 0.50 ± 0.05 and the proton mice data being described best by a one component fit with only one (slow) washout fraction of 0.73 ± 0.06.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25383509     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/23/7229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Monitoring proton therapy with PET.

Authors:  H Paganetti; G El Fakhri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Feasibility study of using fall-off gradients of early and late PET scans for proton range verification.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Kira Grogg; Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Harald Paganetti; Hyun Cheol Lee; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Mapping (15)O production rate for proton therapy verification.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Nathaniel M Alpert; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Mauro Testa; Brian Winey; Marc D Normandin; Helen A Shih; Harald Paganetti; Thomas Bortfeld; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Visualisation of Range Shortening in Carbon Ion Beams and Washout of Positron Emitter: First-in-Human Report.

Authors:  Shintaro Shiba; Makoto Sakai; Masahiko Okamoto; Tatsuya Ohno
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  In Vivo 3-D Dose Verification Using PET/CT Images After Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Lining Sun; Weigang Hu; Songtao Lai; Leijun Shi; Junchao Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Radioactive Beams in Particle Therapy: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Katia Parodi
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2020-08-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.