Literature DB >> 25382893

Thermal adaptation of cellular membranes in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Brandon S Cooper1, Loubna A Hammad2, Kristi L Montooth1.   

Abstract

Changes in temperature disrupt the fluidity of cellular membranes, which can negatively impact membrane integrity and cellular processes. Many ectotherms, including Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen), adjust the glycerophospholipid composition of their membranes to restore optimal fluidity when temperatures change, a type of trait plasticity termed homeoviscous adaptation.Existing data suggest that plasticity in the relative abundances of the glycerophospholipids phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) underlies cellular adaptation to temporal variability in the thermal environment. For example, laboratory populations of D. melanogaster evolved in the presence of temporally variable temperatures have greater developmental plasticity of the ratio of PE to PC (PE/PC) and greater fecundity than do populations evolved at constant temperatures.Here, we extend this work to natural populations of D. melanogaster by evaluating thermal plasticity of glycerophospholipid composition at different life stages, in genotypes isolated from Vermont, Indiana and North Carolina, USA. We also quantify the covariance between developmental and adult (reversible) plasticity, and between adult responses of the membrane to cool and warm thermal shifts.As predicted by physiological models of homeoviscous adaptation, flies from all populations decrease PE/PC and the degree of lipid unsaturation in response to warm temperatures. Furthermore, these populations have diverged in their degree of membrane plasticity. Flies from the most variable thermal environment (Vermont, USA) decrease PE/PC to a greater extent than do other populations when developed at a warm temperature, a pattern that matches our previous observation in laboratory-evolved populations. We also find that developmental plasticity and adult plasticity of PE/PC covary across genotypes, but that adult responses to cool and warm thermal shifts do not.When combined with our previous observations of laboratory-evolved populations, our findings implicate developmental plasticity of PE/PC as a mechanism of thermal adaptation in temporally variable environments. While little is known about the genetic bases of plastic responses to temperature, our observations suggest that both environmentally sensitive and environmentally specific alleles contribute to thermal adaptation of membranes, and that costs of plasticity may arise when the adult environment differs from that experienced during development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; acclimation; cellular membranes; homeoviscous adaptation; phenotypic plasticity; thermal adaptation

Year:  2014        PMID: 25382893      PMCID: PMC4219941          DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Ecol        ISSN: 0269-8463            Impact factor:   5.608


  33 in total

1.  Plasma membrane rafts of rainbow trout are subject to thermal acclimation.

Authors:  John K Zehmer; Jeffrey R Hazel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Behavioral drive versus behavioral inertia in evolution: a null model approach.

Authors:  Raymond B Huey; Paul E Hertz; B Sinervo
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Environmental tolerance, heterogeneity, and the evolution of reversible plastic responses.

Authors:  Wilfried Gabriel; Barney Luttbeg; Andrew Sih; Ralph Tollrian
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: target or by-product of selection in a variable environment?

Authors:  S Via
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF REACTION NORMS.

Authors:  Richard Gomulkiewicz; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  EVOLUTION OF GENERALISTS AND SPECIALISTS IN SPATIALLY HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTS.

Authors:  Peter H Van Tienderen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  Thermal adaptation in biological membranes: is homeoviscous adaptation the explanation?

Authors:  J R Hazel
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 19.318

8.  Profiling and quantification of Drosophila melanogaster lipids using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Loubna A Hammad; Brandon S Cooper; Nicholas P Fisher; Kristi L Montooth; Jonathan A Karty
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Cholesterol content of trout plasma membranes varies with acclimation temperature.

Authors:  J C Robertson; J R Hazel
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1995-11

10.  Review: Thermal preference in Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael E Dillon; George Wang; Paul A Garrity; Raymond B Huey
Journal:  J Therm Biol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.902

View more
  15 in total

1.  Mitochondrial volume density and evidence for its role in adaptive divergence in response to thermal tolerance in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Matthew R J Morris; Sara J S Wuitchik; Jonathan Rosebush; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  UNVEILing connections between genotype, phenotype, and fitness in natural populations.

Authors:  Thomas C Nelson; Matthew R Jones; Jonathan P Velotta; Abhilesh S Dhawanjewar; Rena M Schweizer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Thermal adaptation of cellular membranes in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Loubna A Hammad; Kristi L Montooth
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.608

Review 4.  Revisiting classic clines in Drosophila melanogaster in the age of genomics.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Adrion; Matthew W Hahn; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Loss of cytoplasmic incompatibility and minimal fecundity effects explain relatively low Wolbachia frequencies in Drosophila mauritiana.

Authors:  Megan K Meany; William R Conner; Sophia V Richter; Jessica A Bailey; Michael Turelli; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Dietary Fatty Acids and Temperature Modulate Mitochondrial Function and Longevity in Drosophila.

Authors:  Marissa A Holmbeck; David M Rand
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Phosphatidylethanolamine Is a Key Regulator of Membrane Fluidity in Eukaryotic Cells.

Authors:  Rosie Dawaliby; Cataldo Trubbia; Cédric Delporte; Caroline Noyon; Jean-Marie Ruysschaert; Pierre Van Antwerpen; Cédric Govaerts
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Cold acclimation wholly reorganizes the Drosophila melanogaster transcriptome and metabolome.

Authors:  Heath A MacMillan; Jose M Knee; Alice B Dennis; Hiroko Udaka; Katie E Marshall; Thomas J S Merritt; Brent J Sinclair
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Lipid remodelling in the reef-building honeycomb worm, Sabellaria alveolata, reflects acclimation and local adaptation to temperature.

Authors:  Anna P Muir; Flavia L D Nunes; Stanislas F Dubois; Fabrice Pernet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Differential effects of developmental thermal plasticity across three generations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): canalization and anticipatory matching.

Authors:  Amélie Le Roy; Isabella Loughland; Frank Seebacher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.