Literature DB >> 25382366

Accuracy and early outcomes in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed using patient specific instrumentation.

Stuart W Bell1, James Stoddard2, Caroline Bennett2, Nicholas J London2.   

Abstract

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a technically demanding procedure and poor implant positioning has been identified as a factor in early failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and clinical outcomes of the patient specific instrumentation implementation technique with a fixed bearing UKA. We carried out a prospective study of 41 patients (44 procedures) between December 2011 and April 2013. The preoperative planned sizes of implants used were accurate to within one implant size change in 96% of cases. The mean post-operative limb alignment was 3.8° varus. The Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) (0-48) improved from a mean preoperative score of 23.8 to 35.6 at six weeks and 44.5 at one year. The mean improvement in OKS from preoperative to one year was 20.7. The mean one year FJS (0-100) was 80.6. At a mean follow-up of 24 months there were no complications identified and there was a 100% survivorship. This technique may offer a particular advantage to surgeons who perform lower volumes of UKA with the potential to improve both clinical outcomes and implant survivorship in UKA to achieve greater consistency of results.
© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient specific instrumentation; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25382366     DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0160(14)50007-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  8 in total

1.  Patient-specific instrumentation improves alignment of lateral unicompartmental knee replacements by novice surgeons.

Authors:  Chin Ting Justin Ng; Simon Newman; Simon Harris; Susannah Clarke; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Joint awareness after ACL reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes measured with the Forgotten Joint Score-12.

Authors:  Henrik Behrend; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Johannes M Giesinger; Karlmeinrad Giesinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Sebastien Parratte; Alexandre Lunebourg; Elke Viehweger; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Use of the forgotten joint score (FJS)-12 to evaluate knee awareness after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without meniscus repair or partial meniscectomy.

Authors:  Ismail Eralp Kacmaz; Mehmet Can Gezer; Can Doruk Basa; Vadym Zhamilov; Oguzhan Ekizoglu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-05-03

Review 5.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  The impact of patient-specific instrumentation on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Abtin Alvand; Tanvir Khan; Cathy Jenkins; Jonathan L Rees; William F Jackson; Christopher A F Dodd; David W Murray; Andrew J Price
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Mid-term Clinical and Radiological Results of Oxford Phase 3 Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yusuf Erdem; Cagri Neyisci; Cemil Yıldız
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-16

8.  Biomechanical effects of fixed-bearing femoral prostheses with different coronal positions in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pengcheng Ma; Aikeremujiang Muheremu; Siping Zhang; Qian Zheng; Wei Wang; Kan Jiang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.