BACKGROUND: Underenrollment of clinical studies wastes resources and delays assessment of research discoveries. We describe the organization and impact of a centralized recruitment core delivering comprehensive recruitment support to investigators. METHODS: The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational Science supports a centralized recruitment core, call center, Research Volunteer Repository, data infrastructure, and staff who provide expert recruitment services to investigators. During protocol development, consultations aim to optimize enrollment feasibility, develop recruitment strategy, budget, and advertising. Services during study conduct include advertising placement, repository queries, call management, prescreening, referral, and visit scheduling. Utilization and recruitment outcomes are tracked using dedicated software. RESULTS: For protocols receiving recruitment services during 2009-2013: median time from initiation of recruitment to the first enrolled participant was 10 days; of 4,047 first-time callers to the call center, 92% (n = 3,722) enrolled in the Research Volunteer Repository, with 99% retention; 23% of Repository enrollees subsequently enrolled in ≥1 research studies, with 89% retention. Of volunteers referred by repository queries, 49% (280/537) enrolled into the study, with 92% retained. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of robust recruitment infrastructure including expertise, a volunteer repository, data capture and real-time analysis accelerates protocol accrual. Application of recruitment science improves the quality of clinical investigation.
BACKGROUND: Underenrollment of clinical studies wastes resources and delays assessment of research discoveries. We describe the organization and impact of a centralized recruitment core delivering comprehensive recruitment support to investigators. METHODS: The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational Science supports a centralized recruitment core, call center, Research Volunteer Repository, data infrastructure, and staff who provide expert recruitment services to investigators. During protocol development, consultations aim to optimize enrollment feasibility, develop recruitment strategy, budget, and advertising. Services during study conduct include advertising placement, repository queries, call management, prescreening, referral, and visit scheduling. Utilization and recruitment outcomes are tracked using dedicated software. RESULTS: For protocols receiving recruitment services during 2009-2013: median time from initiation of recruitment to the first enrolled participant was 10 days; of 4,047 first-time callers to the call center, 92% (n = 3,722) enrolled in the Research Volunteer Repository, with 99% retention; 23% of Repository enrollees subsequently enrolled in ≥1 research studies, with 89% retention. Of volunteers referred by repository queries, 49% (280/537) enrolled into the study, with 92% retained. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of robust recruitment infrastructure including expertise, a volunteer repository, data capture and real-time analysis accelerates protocol accrual. Application of recruitment science improves the quality of clinical investigation.
Authors: Donna Brassil; Rhonda G Kost; Kathleen A Dowd; Arlene M Hurley; Tyler-Lauren Rainer; Barry S Coller Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Juliet L Rogers; Timothy R B Johnson; Morton B Brown; Paula M Lantz; Ardeth Greene; Yolanda R Smith Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Manish P Ponda; Kathleen Dowd; Dennis Finkielstein; Peter R Holt; Jan L Breslow Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2012-09-04 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Rainu Kaushal; George Hripcsak; Deborah D Ascheim; Toby Bloom; Thomas R Campion; Arthur L Caplan; Brian P Currie; Thomas Check; Emme Levin Deland; Marc N Gourevitch; Raffaella Hart; Carol R Horowitz; Isaac Kastenbaum; Arthur Aaron Levin; Alexander F H Low; Paul Meissner; Parsa Mirhaji; Harold A Pincus; Charles Scaglione; Donna Shelley; Jonathan N Tobin Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Manish P Ponda; Yupu Liang; Jaehwan Kim; Richard Hutt; Kathleen Dowd; Patricia Gilleaudeau; Mary M Sullivan-Whalen; Tori Rodrick; Dong Joo Kim; Irina Barash; Michelle A Lowes; Jan L Breslow Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Julien W Hsieh; Andreas Keller; Michele Wong; Rong-San Jiang; Leslie B Vosshall Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Rhonda G Kost; Sabrena Mervin-Blake; Rose Hallarn; Charles Rathmann; H Robert Kolb; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Toni D'Agostino; Eric P Rubinstein; Ann M Dozier; Kathryn G Schuff Journal: Acad Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Sarah J Schlesinger; Michelle Romanick; Jonathan N Tobin; Donna Brassil; Rhonda G Kost; Rita Devine; Barbara O'Sullivan; Roger D Vaughan; Yupu Liang; Joel Correa da Rosa; Maija Williams; James G Krueger; Barry S Coller Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Date: 2018-02-02