Literature DB >> 25381420

The problem total knee replacement: systematic, comprehensive and efficient evaluation.

K G Vince1.   

Abstract

There are many reasons why a total knee replacement (TKR) may fail and qualify for revision. Successful revision surgery depends as much on accurate assessment of the problem TKR as it does on revision implant design and surgical technique. Specific modes of failure require specific surgical solutions. Causes of failure are often presented as a list or catalogue, without a system or process for making a decision. In addition, strict definitions and consensus on modes of failure are lacking in published series and registry data. How we approach the problem TKR is an essential but neglected aspect of understanding knee replacement surgery. It must be carried out systematically, comprehensively and efficiently. Eight modes of failure are described: 1) sepsis; 2) extensor discontinuity; 3) stiffness; 4) tibial- femoral instability; 5) patellar tracking; 6) aseptic loosening and osteolysis; 7) periprosthetic fracture and 8) component breakage. A ninth 'category', unexplained pain is an indication for further investigation but not surgery. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knee arthroplasty; diagnosis; failed; investigation; modes of failure; revision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25381420     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  5 in total

1.  Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Juliette A Meyer; Mark Zhu; Alana Cavadino; Brendan Coleman; Jacob T Munro; Simon W Young
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees.

Authors:  Chuan Kong Koh; Irene Zeng; Saiprassad Ravi; Mark Zhu; Kelly G Vince; Simon W Young
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Comparative Analysis of Direct Hospital Care Costs between Aseptic and Two-Stage Septic Knee Revision.

Authors:  Richard Kasch; Sebastian Merk; Grit Assmann; Andreas Lahm; Matthias Napp; Harry Merk; Steffen Flessa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Persistent knee pain after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty secondary to undiagnosed spondylotic myelopathy: a case report.

Authors:  Ziva Petrin; Mitchell Freedman
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2019-07-08

5.  Prosthesis survival after revision knee arthroplasty for "pain without loosening" versus "aseptic loosening": a Danish nationwide study.

Authors:  Kristine Bollerup Arndt; Henrik M Schrøder; Anders Troelsen; Martin Lindberg-Larsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.