Literature DB >> 25381185

Laboratory and workplace assessments of rivet bucking bar vibration emissions.

Thomas W McDowell1, Christopher Warren2, Xueyan S Xu2, Daniel E Welcome2, Ren G Dong2.   

Abstract

Sheet metal workers operating rivet bucking bars are at risk of developing hand and wrist musculoskeletal disorders associated with exposures to hand-transmitted vibrations and forceful exertions required to operate these hand tools. New bucking bar technologies have been introduced in efforts to reduce workplace vibration exposures to these workers. However, the efficacy of these new bucking bar designs has not been well documented. While there are standardized laboratory-based methodologies for assessing the vibration emissions of many types of powered hand tools, no such standard exists for rivet bucking bars. Therefore, this study included the development of a laboratory-based method for assessing bucking bar vibrations which utilizes a simulated riveting task. With this method, this study evaluated three traditional steel bucking bars, three similarly shaped tungsten alloy bars, and three bars featuring spring-dampeners. For comparison the bucking bar vibrations were also assessed during three typical riveting tasks at a large aircraft maintenance facility. The bucking bars were rank-ordered in terms of unweighted and frequency-weighted acceleration measured at the hand-tool interface. The results suggest that the developed laboratory method is a reasonable technique for ranking bucking bar vibration emissions; the lab-based riveting simulations produced similar rankings to the workplace rankings. However, the laboratory-based acceleration averages were considerably lower than the workplace measurements. These observations suggest that the laboratory test results are acceptable for comparing and screening bucking bars, but the laboratory measurements should not be directly used for assessing the risk of workplace bucking bar vibration exposures. The newer bucking bar technologies exhibited significantly reduced vibrations compared to the traditional steel bars. The results of this study, together with other information such as rivet quality, productivity, tool weight, comfort, worker acceptance, and initial cost can be used to make informed bucking bar selections. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HAVS; exposure estimation; musculoskeletal injury; risk assessment; vibration.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25381185      PMCID: PMC4733632          DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meu091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  9 in total

1.  An evaluation of the standardized chipping hammer test specified in ISO 8662-2.

Authors:  R G Dong; T W McDowell; D E Welcome; C Warren; A W Schopper
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2004-01

2.  Laboratory and field measurements and evaluations of vibration at the handles of riveting hammers.

Authors:  Thomas W McDowell; Christopher Warren; Daniel E Welcome; Ren G Dong
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-04-26

3.  Comparing three methods for evaluating impact wrench vibration emissions.

Authors:  Thomas W McDowell; Pierre Marcotte; Cristopher Warren; Daniel E Welcome; Ren G Dong
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-05-22

4.  Exposure to vibration and self-reported health complaints of riveters in the aircraft industry.

Authors:  A Burdorf; A Monster
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1991-06

5.  Vibration reduction of pneumatic percussive rivet tools: mechanical and ergonomic re-design approaches.

Authors:  John G Cherng; Mahmut Eksioglu; Kemal Kizilaslan
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Vibration from riveting tools in the frequency range 6 Hz-10 MHz and Raynaud's phenomenon.

Authors:  R Dandanell; K Engström
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  An investigation into the acute vascular effects of riveting.

Authors:  K M McKenna; S McGrann; A D Blann; J A Allen
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1993-02

8.  Epidemiologic survey of vibration syndrome among riveters, chippers and grinders in the railroad system of the People's Republic of China.

Authors:  Z S Yu; H Chao; L Qiao; D S Qian; Y H Ye
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.024

9.  Exposure conditions and Raynaud's phenomenon among riveters in the aircraft industry.

Authors:  K Engström; R Dandanell
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.024

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Vibration characteristics of golf club heads in their handheld grinding process and potential approaches for reducing the vibration exposure.

Authors:  Qingsong Chen; Hansheng Lin; Bin Xiao; Daniel E Welcome; Jacob Lee; Guiping Chen; Shichuan Tang; Danying Zhang; Guoyong Xu; Maosheng Yan; Hua Yan; Xueyan Xu; Hongying Qu; Ren G Dong
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.656

2.  Tool-specific performance of vibration-reducing gloves for attenuating fingers-transmitted vibration.

Authors:  Daniel E Welcome; Ren G Dong; Xueyan S Xu; Christopher Warren; Thomas W McDowell
Journal:  Occup Ergon       Date:  2016

3.  The effects of feed force on rivet bucking bar vibrations.

Authors:  T W McDowell; X S Xu; C Warren; D E Welcome; R G Dong
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.656

4.  Powered-hand tools and vibration-related disorders in US-railway maintenance-of-way workers.

Authors:  Eckardt Johanning; Marco Stillo; Paul Landsbergis
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.179

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.