Literature DB >> 22539561

Laboratory and field measurements and evaluations of vibration at the handles of riveting hammers.

Thomas W McDowell1, Christopher Warren, Daniel E Welcome, Ren G Dong.   

Abstract

The use of riveting hammers can expose workers to harmful levels of hand-transmitted vibration (HTV). As a part of efforts to reduce HTV exposures through tool selection, the primary objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of a standardized laboratory-based riveting hammer assessment protocol for screening riveting hammers. The second objective was to characterize the vibration emissions of reduced vibration riveting hammers and to make approximations of the HTV exposures of workers operating these tools in actual work tasks. Eight pneumatic riveting hammers were selected for the study. They were first assessed in a laboratory using the standardized method for measuring vibration emissions at the tool handle. The tools were then further assessed under actual working conditions during three aircraft sheet metal riveting tasks. Although the average vibration magnitudes of the riveting hammers measured in the laboratory test were considerably different from those measured in the field study, the rank orders of the tools determined via these tests were fairly consistent, especially for the lower vibration tools. This study identified four tools that consistently exhibited lower frequency-weighted and unweighted accelerations in both the laboratory and workplace evaluations. These observations suggest that the standardized riveting hammer test is acceptable for identifying tools that could be expected to exhibit lower vibrations in workplace environments. However, the large differences between the accelerations measured in the laboratory and field suggest that the standardized laboratory-based tool assessment is not suitable for estimating workplace riveting hammer HTV exposures. Based on the frequency-weighted accelerations measured at the tool handles during the three work tasks, the sheet metal mechanics assigned to these tasks at the studied workplace are unlikely to exceed the daily vibration exposure action value (2.5 m s(-2)) using any of the evaluated riveting hammers.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22539561      PMCID: PMC4677776          DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mes022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  16 in total

1.  An evaluation of the standardized chipping hammer test specified in ISO 8662-2.

Authors:  R G Dong; T W McDowell; D E Welcome; C Warren; A W Schopper
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2004-01

Review 2.  Measurement of vibration of hand-held tools: weighted or unweighted?

Authors:  P L Pelmear; D Leong; W Taylor; M Nagalingam; D Fung
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1989-11

3.  Exposure to vibration and self-reported health complaints of riveters in the aircraft industry.

Authors:  A Burdorf; A Monster
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1991-06

4.  Vibration reduction of pneumatic percussive rivet tools: mechanical and ergonomic re-design approaches.

Authors:  John G Cherng; Mahmut Eksioglu; Kemal Kizilaslan
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Risk assessment of vibration exposure and white fingers among platers.

Authors:  T Nilsson; L Burström; M Hagberg
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  To weight or not to weight ... that is the question.

Authors:  D E Wasserman
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1989-11

7.  Vibration from riveting tools in the frequency range 6 Hz-10 MHz and Raynaud's phenomenon.

Authors:  R Dandanell; K Engström
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Physical characteristics of vibration in relation to vibration-induced white finger.

Authors:  J Starck; P Jussi; P Ilmari
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1990-04

9.  Epidemiologic survey of vibration syndrome among riveters, chippers and grinders in the railroad system of the People's Republic of China.

Authors:  Z S Yu; H Chao; L Qiao; D S Qian; Y H Ye
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.024

10.  Exposure conditions and Raynaud's phenomenon among riveters in the aircraft industry.

Authors:  K Engström; R Dandanell
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.024

View more
  5 in total

1.  Tool-specific performance of vibration-reducing gloves for attenuating palm-transmitted vibrations in three orthogonal directions.

Authors:  Ren G Dong; Daniel E Welcome; Donald R Peterson; Xueyan S Xu; Thomas W McDowell; Christopher Warren; Takafumi Asaki; Simon Kudernatsch; Antony Brammer
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.656

2.  Laboratory and workplace assessments of rivet bucking bar vibration emissions.

Authors:  Thomas W McDowell; Christopher Warren; Xueyan S Xu; Daniel E Welcome; Ren G Dong
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-11-07

3.  Vibration-reducing gloves: transmissibility at the palm of the hand in three orthogonal directions.

Authors:  Thomas W McDowell; Ren G Dong; Daniel E Welcome; Xueyan S Xu; Christopher Warren
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Review and Evaluation of Hand-Arm Coordinate Systems for Measuring Vibration Exposure, Biodynamic Responses, and Hand Forces.

Authors:  Ren G Dong; Erik W Sinsel; Daniel E Welcome; Christopher Warren; Xueyan S Xu; Thomas W McDowell; John Z Wu
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2015-06-19

5.  The effects of feed force on rivet bucking bar vibrations.

Authors:  T W McDowell; X S Xu; C Warren; D E Welcome; R G Dong
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.656

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.