OBJECTIVE: Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) are a group of >200 highly genetically as well as clinically heterogeneous inherited genetic disorders that affect the peripheral nervous and muscular systems, resulting in gross motor disability. The clinical and genetic heterogeneities of NMDs make disease diagnosis complicated and expensive, often involving multiple tests. METHODS: To expedite the molecular diagnosis of NMDs, we designed and validated several next generation sequencing (NGS)-based comprehensive gene panel tests that include complementary deletion and duplication testing through comparative genomic hybridization arrays. Our validation established the targeted gene panel test to have 100% sensitivity and specificity for single nucleotide variant detection. To compare the clinical diagnostic yields of single gene (NMD-associated) tests with the various NMD NGS panel tests, we analyzed data from all clinical tests performed at the Emory Genetics Laboratory from October 2009 through May 2014. We further compared the clinical utility of the targeted NGS panel test with that of exome sequencing (ES). RESULTS: We found that NMD comprehensive panel testing has a 3-fold greater diagnostic yield (46%) than single gene testing (15-19%). Sanger fill-in of low-coverage exons, copy number variation analysis, and thorough in-house validation of the assay all complement panel testing and allow the detection of all types of causative pathogenic variants, some of which (about 18%) may be missed by ES. INTERPRETATION: Our results strongly indicate that for molecular diagnosis of heterogeneous disorders such as NMDs, targeted panel testing has the highest clinical yield and should therefore be the preferred first-tier approach.
OBJECTIVE:Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) are a group of >200 highly genetically as well as clinically heterogeneous inherited genetic disorders that affect the peripheral nervous and muscular systems, resulting in gross motor disability. The clinical and genetic heterogeneities of NMDs make disease diagnosis complicated and expensive, often involving multiple tests. METHODS: To expedite the molecular diagnosis of NMDs, we designed and validated several next generation sequencing (NGS)-based comprehensive gene panel tests that include complementary deletion and duplication testing through comparative genomic hybridization arrays. Our validation established the targeted gene panel test to have 100% sensitivity and specificity for single nucleotide variant detection. To compare the clinical diagnostic yields of single gene (NMD-associated) tests with the various NMD NGS panel tests, we analyzed data from all clinical tests performed at the Emory Genetics Laboratory from October 2009 through May 2014. We further compared the clinical utility of the targeted NGS panel test with that of exome sequencing (ES). RESULTS: We found that NMD comprehensive panel testing has a 3-fold greater diagnostic yield (46%) than single gene testing (15-19%). Sanger fill-in of low-coverage exons, copy number variation analysis, and thorough in-house validation of the assay all complement panel testing and allow the detection of all types of causative pathogenic variants, some of which (about 18%) may be missed by ES. INTERPRETATION: Our results strongly indicate that for molecular diagnosis of heterogeneous disorders such as NMDs, targeted panel testing has the highest clinical yield and should therefore be the preferred first-tier approach.
Authors: S M Hiatt; M D Amaral; K M Bowling; C R Finnila; M L Thompson; D E Gray; J M J Lawlor; J N Cochran; E M Bebin; K B Brothers; K M East; W V Kelley; N E Lamb; S E Levy; E J Lose; M B Neu; C A Rich; S Simmons; R M Myers; G S Barsh; G M Cooper Journal: Clin Genet Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: Beryl B Cummings; Jamie L Marshall; Taru Tukiainen; Monkol Lek; Sandra Donkervoort; A Reghan Foley; Veronique Bolduc; Leigh B Waddell; Sarah A Sandaradura; Gina L O'Grady; Elicia Estrella; Hemakumar M Reddy; Fengmei Zhao; Ben Weisburd; Konrad J Karczewski; Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; Daniel Birnbaum; Anna Sarkozy; Ying Hu; Hernan Gonorazky; Kristl Claeys; Himanshu Joshi; Adam Bournazos; Emily C Oates; Roula Ghaoui; Mark R Davis; Nigel G Laing; Ana Topf; Peter B Kang; Alan H Beggs; Kathryn N North; Volker Straub; James J Dowling; Francesco Muntoni; Nigel F Clarke; Sandra T Cooper; Carsten G Bönnemann; Daniel G MacArthur Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Hussein Daoud; Stephanie M Luco; Rui Li; Eric Bareke; Chandree Beaulieu; Olga Jarinova; Nancy Carson; Sarah M Nikkel; Gail E Graham; Julie Richer; Christine Armour; Dennis E Bulman; Pranesh Chakraborty; Michael Geraghty; Matthew A Lines; Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil; Jacek Majewski; Kym M Boycott; David A Dyment Journal: CMAJ Date: 2016-05-30 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Tiong Yang Tan; Oliver James Dillon; Zornitza Stark; Deborah Schofield; Khurshid Alam; Rupendra Shrestha; Belinda Chong; Dean Phelan; Gemma R Brett; Emma Creed; Anna Jarmolowicz; Patrick Yap; Maie Walsh; Lilian Downie; David J Amor; Ravi Savarirayan; George McGillivray; Alison Yeung; Heidi Peters; Susan J Robertson; Aaron J Robinson; Ivan Macciocca; Simon Sadedin; Katrina Bell; Alicia Oshlack; Peter Georgeson; Natalie Thorne; Clara Gaff; Susan M White Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Anne T Berg; Jason Coryell; Russell P Saneto; Zachary M Grinspan; John J Alexander; Mariana Kekis; Joseph E Sullivan; Elaine C Wirrell; Renée A Shellhaas; John R Mytinger; William D Gaillard; Eric H Kossoff; Ignacio Valencia; Kelly G Knupp; Courtney Wusthoff; Cynthia Keator; William B Dobyns; Nicole Ryan; Tobias Loddenkemper; Catherine J Chu; Edward J Novotny; Sookyong Koh Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: David J Birnkrant; Katharine Bushby; Carla M Bann; Susan D Apkon; Angela Blackwell; David Brumbaugh; Laura E Case; Paula R Clemens; Stasia Hadjiyannakis; Shree Pandya; Natalie Street; Jean Tomezsko; Kathryn R Wagner; Leanne M Ward; David R Weber Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Hemakumar M Reddy; Sherifa A Hamed; Monkol Lek; Satomi Mitsuhashi; Elicia Estrella; Michael D Jones; Lane J Mahoney; Anna R Duncan; Kyung-Ah Cho; Daniel G Macarthur; Louis M Kunkel; Peter B Kang Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 3.217