Literature DB >> 25379869

Clinical and ultrastructural characteristics of graft failure in DMEK: 1-year results after repeat DMEK.

Aleksandar Ćirković1, Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt, Julia M Weller, Friedrich E Kruse, Theofilos Tourtas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of preexisting corneal pathology on the outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), and also to evaluate the long-term outcome of repeat DMEK for graft failure after primary DMEK.
METHODS: Eighteen patients undergoing repeat DMEK after failed DMEK were enrolled; 9 of 18 patients had successful primary DMEK on the fellow eye. Evaluations included preoperative anterior chamber depth, intraoperative degree of difficulty, transmission electron microscopy images (n = 14), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density, central corneal thickness, corneal volume, and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: Surgeries that led to graft failure had a higher intraoperative degree of difficulty compared with successful surgeries (P = 0.002). Eight of 14 failed grafts showed ultrastructural abnormalities, that is, inclusions or deposits of abnormal fibrillar material in Descemet membrane, indicating endothelial dysfunction before transplantation. BCVA on day 10 after surgery was worse in eyes with graft failure compared with successful DMEK (P = 0.008). Median BCVA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) improved from 0.5 before DMEK and 1.9 before repeat DMEK to 0.3 at 1-year follow-up (P = 0.011). One year after repeat DMEK, endothelial cell density (cells/mm2) of donor corneas decreased from 2501 ± 264 to 1373 ± 270 (P < 0.001), central corneal thickness (µm) decreased from 807 ± 160 to 576 ± 178 (P = 0.002), and corneal volume (mm3) decreased from 84.1 ± 13.0 to 64.4 ± 12.5 (P = 0.002). Patient satisfaction showed no difference between primary and repeat DMEK.
CONCLUSIONS: A preexisting subclinical corneal endothelial dysfunction may contribute to primary DMEK failure. Repeat DMEK can be performed safely with good long-term outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25379869     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  6 in total

1.  Ultrahigh-resolution OCT imaging of the human cornea.

Authors:  René M Werkmeister; Sabina Sapeta; Doreen Schmidl; Gerhard Garhöfer; Gerald Schmidinger; Valentin Aranha Dos Santos; Gerold C Aschinger; Isabella Baumgartner; Niklas Pircher; Florian Schwarzhans; Anca Pantalon; Harminder Dua; Leopold Schmetterer
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  [Complications of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty].

Authors:  K Spaniol; M Borrelli; C Holtmann; S Schrader; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Lamellar keratoplasty techniques.

Authors:  Nadisha P Singh; Dalia G Said; Harminder Singh Dua
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Functional outcome of repeat Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for corneal decompensation following graft failure after primary DMEK.

Authors:  Bishr Agha; Mehdi Shajari; Anna Slavik-Lencova; Thomas Kohnen; Ingo Schmack
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-07

5.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: analysis of clinical outcomes of patients with 8-10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Julia M Weller; Friedrich E Kruse; Theofilos Tourtas
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.029

6.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): clinical results of precut versus surgeon-cut grafts.

Authors:  Doreen Koechel; Nicola Hofmann; Jan D Unterlauft; Peter Wiedemann; Christian Girbardt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.117

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.