Literature DB >> 25379770

Stratified reproduction, family planning care and the double edge of history.

Lisa H Harris1, Taida Wolfe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is a growing clinical consensus that Medicaid sterilization consent protections should be revisited because they impede desired care for many women. Here, we consider the broad social and ideological contexts for past sterilization abuses, beyond informed consent. RECENT
FINDINGS: Throughout the US history, the fertility and childbearing of poor women and women of color were not valued equally to those of affluent white women. This is evident in a range of practices and policies, including black women's treatment during slavery, removal of Native children to off-reservation boarding schools and coercive sterilizations of poor white women and women of color. Thus, reproductive experiences throughout the US history were stratified. This ideology of stratified reproduction persists today in social welfare programs, drug policy and programs promoting long-acting reversible contraception.
SUMMARY: At their core, sterilization abuses reflected an ideology of stratified reproduction, in which some women's fertility was devalued compared to other women's fertility. Revisiting Medicaid sterilization regulations must therefore put issues of race, ethnicity, class, power and resources - not just informed consent - at the center of analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25379770     DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  24 in total

1.  Query the merits of embryo editing for reproductive research now.

Authors:  Insoo Hyun; Catherine Osborn
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Black-White Differences in Attitudes Related to Pregnancy Among Young Women.

Authors:  Jennifer S Barber; Jennifer Eckerman Yarger; Heather H Gatny
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2015-06

3.  Abortion access and state variation in observed unintended pregnancy.

Authors:  Amanda Jean Stevenson; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Feasibility and acceptability of a toolkit-based process to implement patient-centered, immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception services.

Authors:  Michelle H Moniz; Vanessa K Dalton; Roger D Smith; Lauren E Owens; Zach Landis-Lewis; Alex F Peahl; Barbara Van Kainen; Margaret R Punch; Marisa K Wetmore; Kirsten Bonawitz; Giselle E Kolenic; Christine Dehlendorf; Michele Heisler
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Abortion During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Racial Disparities and Barriers to Care in the USA.

Authors:  Taida Wolfe; Yana van der Meulen Rodgers
Journal:  Sex Res Social Policy       Date:  2021-03-22

6.  Perceptions and practice of state Medicaid officials regarding informed consent for female sterilization.

Authors:  Heather Bouma-Johnston; Roselle Ponsaran; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Attitudes and beliefs of obstetricians-gynecologists regarding Medicaid postpartum sterilization - A qualitative study.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Roselle Ponsaran; Laura Morello; Leila Katabi; Rosemary T Behmer Hansen; Nikki Zite; Kari White
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Care That Promotes Reproductive Justice.

Authors:  Michelle H Moniz; Kayte Spector-Bagdady; Michele Heisler; Lisa Hope Harris
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reparations: The Debt We Owe (and Continue to Accumulate).

Authors:  Megan L Swanson; Sara Whetstone; Tushani Illangasekare; Amy Meg Autry
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2021-05-24

10.  From goodness to good looks: Changing images of human germline genetic modification.

Authors:  Derek So
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.512

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.