| Literature DB >> 25379186 |
Shervin Jamshidi1, Abbas Akbarzadeh2, Kwang-Sung Woo3, Alireza Valipour3.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the potential use of anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) followed by Bio-rack wetland planted with Phragmites sp. and Typha sp. for treating domestic wastewater generated by small communities (751 mg COD/L, 500 SCOD mg/L, 348 mg BOD5/L). Two parallel laboratory-scale models showed that the process planted with Phragmites sp. and Typha sp. are capable of removing COD by 87% & 86%, SCOD by 90% & 88%, BOD5 by 93% & 92%, TSS by 88% & 86%, TN by 79% & 77%, PO4-P by 21% & 14% at an overall HRT of 21 (843 g COD/m(3)/day & 392 g BOD5/m(3)/day) and 27 (622 g COD/m(3)/day & 302 g BOD5/m(3)/day) hours, respectively. Microbial analysis indicated a high reduction in the MPN of total coliform and TVC as high as 99% at the outlet end of the processes. The vegetated system using Phragmites sp. showed significantly greater (p <0.05) pollutant removal efficiencies due to its extensive root and mass growth rate (p <0.05) of the plant compared to Typha sp. The Phragmites sp. indicated a higher relative growth rate (3.92%) than Typha sp. (0.90%). Microorganisms immobilized on the surface of the Bio-rack media (mean TVC: 2.33 × 10(7) cfu/cm(2)) were isolated, identified and observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). This study illustrated that the present integrated processes could be an ideal approach for promoting a sustainable decentralization, however, Phragmites sp. would be more efficient rather than Typha sp.Entities:
Keywords: Anaerobic baffled reactor; Bio-rack wetland system; Domestic wastewater treatment; Phragmites sp; Typha sp
Year: 2014 PMID: 25379186 PMCID: PMC4212116 DOI: 10.1186/s40201-014-0131-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Health Sci Eng
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the integrated treatment systems ( ABR : anaerobic baffled reactor ( ABR ), BRS : bio - rack system ).
Experimental conditions implied in wastewater treatment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Operation period (day) | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
| Overall HRT (hours) | 41 | 33 | 27 | 24 | 21 | 18 |
| HRTABR (hours) | 22 | 18 | 15 | 13 | 11 | 10 |
| HRTBRS (hours) | 19 | 15 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 8 |
| Q (L/day) | 65 | 80 | 96 | 114 | 126 | 144 |
| OLR | ||||||
| (g COD/day) | 50 ± 2.63 | 61 ± 3.02 | 68 ± 2.02 | 85 ± 6.02 | 93 ± 6.46 | 113 ± 2.56 |
| (g BOD5/day) | 23 ± 1.96 | 29 ± 2.60 | 33 ± 2.09 | 40 ± 3.51 | 43 ± 3.07 | 50 ± 4.11 |
| (g COD/m3/day)* | 455 ± 24 | 553 ± 27 | 622 ± 18 | 769 ± 55 | 843 ± 59 | 1024 ± 23 |
| (g BOD5/m3/day)* | 205 ± 18 | 260 ± 24 | 302 ± 19 | 361 ± 32 | 392 ± 28 | 452 ± 37 |
HRT: hydraulic retention time; Q: flow rate; OLR: organic loading rate *based on the sum of effective volume both ABR and BRS.
Figure 2Effluent ( a ) SCOD and ( b ) BOD concentrations with five days repetition through the integrated systems .
Organic pollutant removal with five days repetition through the integrated systems
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| 41 | 21.85 ± 1.96 | 21.63 ± 1.90 | 0.486 |
| 33 | 27.71 ± 2.60 | 27.21 ± 2.50 | 0.398 |
| 27 | 31.95 ± 2.2 | 30.64 ± 2.23 | 0.102 |
| 23 | 37.85 ± 3.60 | 35.93 ± 3.56 | 0.062 |
| 21 | 40.14 ± 2.93 | 37.19 ± 2.80 | 0.016 |
| 18 | 45.21 ± 4.20 | 41.15 ± 4.25 | 0.007 |
HRT: hydraulic retention time;
ABR-BRSUP: anaerobic baffled reactor - bio-rack system using Phragmites sp.;
ABR-BRSUT: anaerobic baffled reactor - bio-rack system using Typha sp.
Figure 3Mean DO values of the processes effluent with five days repetition.
Summary of effluents characteristic with five days repetition from two integrated treatment systems
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| pH | 7.45 ± 0.09 | 7.10 ± 0.05 | 7.19 ± 0.04 | - | 7.50 ± 0.10 | 7.15 ± 0.06 | 7.29 ± 0.05 | - |
| DO | 0.16 ± 0.05 | - | 3.2 ± 0.14 | - | 0.18 ± 0.06 | - | 2.6 ± 0.20 | - |
| COD | 736 ± 51.28 | 420.4 ± 30.96 | 95.2 ± 2.28 | 87.1 | 713 ± 21.40 | 290 ± 17.04 | 97.4 ± 1.52 | 86.3 |
| SCOD | 515 ± 42.51 | 256 ± 25.26 | 53.4 ± 6.12 | 89.6 | 473 ± 24 | 173.8 ± 26.25 | 54.4 ± 7.85 | 88.5 |
| BOD5 | 342 ± 24.36 | 150 ± 12.32 | 23.4 ± 3.13 | 93.2 | 345.6 ± 22 | 110 ± 8.12 | 26.4 ± 1.67 | 92.4 |
| TSS | 523.4 ± 48.22 | 245 ± 42.66 | 61 ± 11.71 | 88.3 | 521 ± 47 | 237.2 ± 28.62 | 71.2 ± 7.33 | 86.3 |
| TN | 67.97 ± 3.88 | 56.31 ± 5.17 | 14.02 ± 0.64 | 79.4 | 63.45 ± 5.72 | 51.25 ± 4.61 | 14.41 ± 0.32 | 77.3 |
| PO4-P | 13.65 ± 0.65 | 20.26 ± 1.82 | 10.73 ± 1.16 | 21.4 | 15.30 ± 0.43 | 22.69 ± 2.25 | 13.13 ± 1.04 | 14.2 |
*All analytical values except pH are based on mg/L.
Figure 4Mean ( a ) total coliform and ( b ) total viable count values through the integrated systems.
Figure 5SEM photographs of the biofilm - forming bacteria on the surface of Bio - racks in ( a ) ABR-BRSUP and ( b ) ABR - BRSUT .
Morphology characteristics of the plants at initial step and after 15 days operation (n = 5)
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Number of leaves | 6.2 ± 1.8 | 10.4 ± 1.14 | 8.8 ± 1.3 | 12 ± 1.6 | 0.0393 |
| Size of leaves (mm2) | 24.3 ± 2.75 | 26.65 ± 2.17 | 96.02 ± 22 | 140.05 ± 20 | 0.0001 |
| Number of roots | 9.8 ± 1.5 | 28.2 ± 5.8 | 45.4 ± 17.52 | 94.6 ± 18.25 | 0.0005 |
| Longest root (mm) | 12.7 ± 1.43 | 16.42 ± 1.05 | 19.34 ± 4.2 | 22.64 ± 5 | 0.0670 |
| Dry weight (g/plant) | 0.65 ± 0.5 | 1.17 ± 0.6 | 28.39 ± 1.7 | 32.49 ± 1.3 | 0.0014 |
| Ash weight (g/plant) | 0.035 ± 0.006 | 0.114 ± 0.05 | 3.018 ± 0.42 | 3.91 ± 0.2 | 0.0002 |
Pre-estimated capital cost of integrated treatment systems (Q =1m /d, COD <100 mg/L, and BOD < 30 mg/L)
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Volume (m3/m3 inflow) | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.63 | 0.54 |
| Cost | ||||
| US$/m3 inflow | 30 | 60 | 40 | 80 |
| US$/kg BOD5 removed | 155 | 480 | 167 | 950 |
| Total cost | ||||
| US$/m3 inflow | 90 | 120 | ||
| US$/kg BOD5 removed | 635 | 1117 | ||
ABR: anaerobic baffled reactor; BRSUP: bio-rack system using Phragmites sp.; BRSUT: bio-rack system using Typha sp.