Literature DB >> 14723937

Performance of a sub-surface flow constructed wetland in polishing pre-treated wastewater-a tropical case study.

M E Kaseva1.   

Abstract

This paper reports on the performance of three units of a sub-surface horizontal flow constructed wetland (CW) pilot plant in polishing effluent from the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor plant. Studies on the use of UASB for on-site wastewater pre-treatment were initiated in Tanzania for the first time in 1993, while initial research works on the application of CW for polishing effluent from UASB, the results of which are reported in this paper began in 1999. In this study the UASB reactor plant received and pre-treated part of the wastewater from the student's hostels at the University College of Lands and Architectural Studies in Tanzania. Out of the three units, unit B was planted with Phragmites mauritianus, unit C with Typha latifolia and A was used as a control. Both P.mauritianus and T.latifolia have been extensively researched in Europe and USA as suitable species of vegetation in CW. However, very limited studies on the suitability of these wetland plants have been reported under tropical climate. The studied parameters were chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrate (NO(3)-N), nitrite (NO(2)-N), ammonium (NH(4)-N), faecal coliforms (FC), total coliforms (TC), pH, temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO). The study was carried out at an average hydraulic retention time of 1.93 days (1.85 in unit A, 1.96 in unit B and 1.99 in unit C) obtained as a ratio of the volume of wastewater in the wetland and the volumetric flow rate of wastewater through the wetland unit while taking into consideration the porosity of the media. Better performance for the vegetated units B and C were obtained compared to the control unit A. Nutrients were least removed in all units (NH(4)-N 11.2%, 25.2% and 23% in units A, B and C, respectively, NO(3)-N 32.2%, 40.3% and 44.3% for units A, B and C, respectively, and NO(2)-N 23.9%, 38.5% and 23.1% for units A, B and C, respectively). The COD removal rate was 33.6%, 56.3% and 60.7% for units A, B and C, respectively. The study also indicated that pH increased from the influent to the effluent and that DO increase was related to the decrease of temperature. FC and TC removal ranged from 43% to 72%, with the least removal in unit A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14723937     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.10.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  5 in total

Review 1.  Effect of plants in constructed wetlands for organic carbon and nutrient removal: a review of experimental factors contributing to higher impact and suggestions for future guidelines.

Authors:  João M Jesus; Anthony S Danko; António Fiúza; Maria-Teresa Borges
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A Constructed Wetland for Treatment of an Impacted Waterway and the Influence of Native Waterfowl on its Perceived Effectiveness.

Authors:  Brian R McMinn; Sara Klemm; Asja Korajkic; Kimberly M Wyatt; Michael P Herrmann; Richard A Haugland; Jingrang Lu; Eric N Villegas; Craig Frye
Journal:  Ecol Eng       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Wastewater treatment using integrated anaerobic baffled reactor and Bio-rack wetland planted with Phragmites sp. and Typha sp.

Authors:  Shervin Jamshidi; Abbas Akbarzadeh; Kwang-Sung Woo; Alireza Valipour
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2014-10-25

4.  Removing Organic Matter and Nutrients from Pig Farm Wastewater with a Constructed Wetland System.

Authors:  Celia De La Mora-Orozco; Irma Julieta González-Acuña; Ruben Alfonso Saucedo-Terán; Hugo Ernesto Flores-López; Hector Osbaldo Rubio-Arias; Jesús Manuel Ochoa-Rivero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Natural treatment systems as sustainable ecotechnologies for the developing countries.

Authors:  Qaisar Mahmood; Arshid Pervez; Bibi Saima Zeb; Habiba Zaffar; Hajra Yaqoob; Muhammad Waseem; Sumera Afsheen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.