| Literature DB >> 25379162 |
Kamran Dorostkar1, Sayed Mortaza Alavi Shoushtari2, Amir Khaki2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of in vitro zinc sulphate additive to semen extender on sperm parameters (progressive motility, viability, membrane integrity and DNA stability) after cryopreservation.Entities:
Keywords: Buffalo; Semen; Zinc
Year: 2014 PMID: 25379162 PMCID: PMC4221520
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Fertil Steril ISSN: 2008-0778
Effects of different zinc sulphate concentrations (mg/L) on the motility and viability (LS mean ± SEM) of spermatozoa in freshly diluted semen
| Parameter | Time | Treatment | SE | P value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.072 | 0.144 | 0.288 | 0.576 | 1.152 | TRT | STG | TRT×STG | |||
| T0 | 84.8± 1.5ab | 84.2± 1.4ab | 85.0± 1.8ab | 85.4± 1.2a | 80.7± 1.7b | 75.2± 1.2c | 0.0025 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| T1 | 80.8± 1.3ac | 81.0± 1.4ac | 83.5± 1.6ab | 85.5± 1.1b | 78.2± 1.7c | 71.7± 1.2d | 0.0025 | ||||
| T2 | 77.4± 1.5a** | 78.9± 1.2bc** | 81.6± 1.4b | 85.7± 1.1c | 72.7± 1.0d***+ | 67.9± 1.2e***+ | 0.0025 | ||||
| T0 | 86.1± 1.2ab | 86.3± 1.2ab | 87.3± 1.5a | 87.2± 1.0ab | 83.5± 1.6b | 77.8± 1.2c | 0.0016 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0220 | |
| T1 | 83.8± 1.5ab | 84.2± 1.2a | 85.6± 1.4a | 86.8± 1.0a | 80.2± 1.6b | 74.0± 1.3c* | 0.0016 | ||||
| T2 | 81.7± 1.1ac* | 80.2± 1.4ac**+ | 83.5± 1.2ab | 86.3± 0.9b | 78.7± 1.2c* | 71.7± 0.9d*** | 0.0016 | ||||
T0; 0, T1; 60, T2; 120 minutes after diluting semen, a, b, c, d, e ; Signify a significant difference (p<0.05) within the same row, *; Signifies a significant difference (p<0.05) with T0 values, **; Signifies a significant difference (p<0.01) with T0 values,***; Signifies a significant difference (p<0.001) with T0 values, +; Denotes a significant difference (p<0.05) with T1 values, LS; Least square, TRT; Treatment and STG; Stage.
Effect of different zinc sulphate concentrations (mg/L) on sperm parameters (LS mean ± SEM) after equilibrium and thawing* time
| Parameter | Stage | Treatment | SE | P value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.072 | 0.144 | 0.288 | 0.576 | 1.152 | TRT | STG | TRT×STG | |||
| EQ | 71.4± 1.9a | 73.5± 1.8ab | 78.3± 1.6bc | 80.7± 1.9c | 64.1± 1.6d | 56.9± 1.3e | 0.0081 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| TW | 40.5± 1.7a | 43.2± 2.0ab | 47.8± 1.9b | 53.7± 1.8c | 32.9± 1.7d | 27.6± 1.6e | 0.0081 | ||||
| EQ | 78.0± 1.5a | 79.1± 1.3a | 80.4± 1.2a | 84.1± 1.0b | 77.4± 1.1a | 73.5± 1.3c | 0.0036 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| TW | 60.1± 1.5a | 62.0± 1.6ab | 65.7± 1.8b | 70.8± 1.8c | 59.6± 1.8a | 53.7± 1.9d | 0.0036 | ||||
| EQ | 79.0± 1.2ac | 79.4± 1.3ac | 81.7± 0.9ab | 83.3± 0.9b | 77.8± 1.1c | 73.8± 1.5d | 0.0036 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| TW | 56.6± 1.7a | 58.9± 1.7a | 62.1± 1.8b | 67.3± 1.6c | 54.9± 1.7a | 48.8± 2.2d | 0.0036 | ||||
| EQ | 3.0 ± 0.25a | 3.4 ± 0.21a | 3.4 ± 0.23a | 3.0 ± 0.25a | 3.5 ± 0.24ab | 4.14± 0.21b | 0.0025 | ||||
| TW | 11.8 ± 0.33a | 11.6 ± 0.43a | 10.3± 0.49b | 10.1± 0.47b | 12.2± 0.33ac | 13.3± 0.26c | 0.0025 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.3084 | |
| TW | 63 ± 3.2a | 64 ± 3.7a | 77 ± 3.4b | 81 ± 3.3b | 57 ± 2.7ac | 49 ± 2.4c | |||||
*; 30 seconds in a 37˚C water bath, EQ; After equilibrium, TW; After thawing, TAC; Total antioxidant capacity, a, b, c, d, e; Signify a significant difference (p<0.05) within the same row, LS; Least square, TRT; Treatment and STG; Stage.