Dr Ellington1, M Mann1, Cb Bowling2, Er Drelichman3, Wj Greer1, Jm Szychowski4, He Richter1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Women's Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Urogynecology; University of Tennessee, Medical Center, Knoxville, TN. 3. Inflammatory Disease Center, Gastrointestinal Surgery, St John Health System, Southfield, MI. 4. Department of Biostatistics; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Characterize pelvic floor symptom distress and impact, sexual function and quality of life in women who underwent rectal prolapse surgery. METHODS: Subjects undergoing rectal prolapse surgery from 2004-2009 completed questionnaires including the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and the Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire. Baseline demographic, medical, and surgical characteristics were extracted by chart review. Demographic and clinic outcomes of women undergoing transperineal and abdominal approaches were compared. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical measures. RESULTS: 45 were identified; two deceased at follow-up. 28/43 subjects (65.1%) responded to the questionnaires. Mean time from original procedure was 3.9 ± 3.1 years. No differences in median total Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and subscale scores, and Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire scores in women undergoing open rectopexy versus transperineal proctectomy were seen (all p>0.05). 26 (60%) participants answered the Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, nine reported sexual activity within the last month. All underwent abdominal procedures. CONCLUSION: There are few colorectal or other pelvic floor symptoms after rectal prolapse repair. Robust prospective studies are needed to more fully characterize and understand issues associated with rectal prolapse surgery in women.
OBJECTIVE: Characterize pelvic floor symptom distress and impact, sexual function and quality of life in women who underwent rectal prolapse surgery. METHODS: Subjects undergoing rectal prolapse surgery from 2004-2009 completed questionnaires including the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and the Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire. Baseline demographic, medical, and surgical characteristics were extracted by chart review. Demographic and clinic outcomes of women undergoing transperineal and abdominal approaches were compared. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical measures. RESULTS: 45 were identified; two deceased at follow-up. 28/43 subjects (65.1%) responded to the questionnaires. Mean time from original procedure was 3.9 ± 3.1 years. No differences in median total Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and subscale scores, and Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire scores in women undergoing open rectopexy versus transperineal proctectomy were seen (all p>0.05). 26 (60%) participants answered the Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, nine reported sexual activity within the last month. All underwent abdominal procedures. CONCLUSION: There are few colorectal or other pelvic floor symptoms after rectal prolapse repair. Robust prospective studies are needed to more fully characterize and understand issues associated with rectal prolapse surgery in women.
Authors: R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: J V Roig; E Buch; R Alós; A Solana; C Fernández; C Villoslada; J García-Armengol; J Hinojosa Journal: Rev Esp Enferm Dig Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 2.086
Authors: John Eric Jelovsek; Zhen Chen; Alayne D Markland; Linda Brubaker; Keisha Y Dyer; Susie Meikle; David D Rahn; Nazeema Y Siddiqui; Ashok Tuteja; Matthew D Barber Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: P Boccasanta; R Rosati; M Venturi; U Cioffi; M De Simone; M Montorsi; A Peracchia Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 1.878
Authors: Sean C Glasgow; Elisa H Birnbaum; Ira J Kodner; James W Fleshman; David W Dietz Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-05-31 Impact factor: 3.452