Literature DB >> 18516652

Recurrence and quality of life following perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse.

Sean C Glasgow1, Elisa H Birnbaum, Ira J Kodner, James W Fleshman, David W Dietz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical outcome and quality of life (QOL) following perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse remain poorly documented.
METHODS: From 1994 to 2004, patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse were treated exclusively with perineal proctectomy independent of age or comorbidities. Subjective patient assessments and recurrences were determined retrospectively from hospital and clinic records. Consenting patients completed the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI).
RESULTS: Perineal proctectomy was performed in 103 consecutive patients with a median age of 75 years (range 30-94). Most patients underwent concurrent levatorplasty (anterior 85.8%, posterior 67.9%). Durable results were obtained in all patients; the recurrence rate was 8.5% over a mean follow-up of 36 months. Preoperatively, 75.5% of patients reported fecal incontinence, and 32.1% had obstructed defecation. Incontinence significantly improved post-proctectomy (41.5%, p < 0.001), as did constipation (10.4%, p < 0.001). GIQLI respondents reported satisfaction following proctectomy with 63% scoring within one standard deviation of healthy controls. Patients with recurrent prolapse reported a lower QOL. Risk factors for recurrence included duration of prolapse, need for posterior levatorplasty, and prior anorectal surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Perineal proctectomy provides significant relief from fecal incontinence and obstructive symptoms caused by rectal prolapse, with an acceptable recurrence rate and low morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18516652     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0531-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  22 in total

1.  Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy.

Authors:  J G Williams; D A Rothenberger; R D Madoff; S M Goldberg
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sanjay Purkayastha; Paris Tekkis; Thanos Athanasiou; Omer Aziz; Paraskeva Paraskevas; Paul Ziprin; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Sean C Glasgow; Elisa H Birnbaum; Ira J Kodner; James W Fleshman; David W Dietz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Perineal proctectomy, posterior rectopexy, and postanal levator repair for the treatment of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  M L Prasad; R K Pearl; H Abcarian; C P Orsay; R L Nelson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Nineteen years' experience with the one-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  W A Altemeier; W R Culbertson; C Schowengerdt; J Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Anorectal function and defecation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A M Metcalf; V Loening-Baucke
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Rectal prolapse: a search for the "best" operation.

Authors:  K Azimuddin; I T Khubchandani; L Rosen; J J Stasik; R D Riether; J F Reed
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  The Altemeier repair: outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  M H Kimmins; B K Evetts; J Isler; R Billingham
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency influences surgical outcome in treatment of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  E H Birnbaum; L Stamm; J F Rafferty; R D Fry; I J Kodner; J W Fleshman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Anal sphincter morphology in patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Lee S Dvorkin; Christopher L H Chan; Charles H Knowles; Norman S Williams; Peter J Lunniss; S Mark Scott
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quality of life after laparoscopic resection rectopexy.

Authors:  Mia Kim; Joachim Reibetanz; Lars Boenicke; Christoph-Thomas Germer; David Jayne; Christoph Isbert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Short-term outcomes of local correction of stoma prolapse with a stapler device.

Authors:  K Masumori; K Maeda; T Hanai; H Sato; Y Koide; H Matsuoka; H Katsuno; M Shiota
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Explaining the undulating outcomes of perineal rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier Procedure) for rectal prolapse over the last century: technique matters!

Authors:  W C Cirocco
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Caitlin W Hicks; Andreas M Kaiser; Karim Alavi; Ranjan Sudan; Paul E Wise
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  PELVIC FLOOR SYMPTOMS AND QUALITY OF LIFE ANALYSES IN WOMEN UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR RECTAL PROLPASE.

Authors:  Dr Ellington; M Mann; Cb Bowling; Er Drelichman; Wj Greer; Jm Szychowski; He Richter
Journal:  World J Colorectal Surg       Date:  2013-12

6.  Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse-the preferred procedure for the unfit elderly patient? 10 years experience from a UK tertiary centre.

Authors:  M Alwahid; S R Knight; H Wadhawan; K L Campbell; D Ziyaie; S M P Koch
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.781

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.