BACKGROUND: Descriptions of and recommendations for meeting the challenges of training research staff for multisite studies are limited despite the recognized importance of training on trial outcomes. The STRIDE (STimulant Reduction Intervention using Dosed Exercise) study is a multisite randomized clinical trial that was conducted at nine addiction treatment programs across the United States within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) and evaluated the addition ofexercise to addiction treatment as usual (TAU), compared to health education added to TAU, for individuals with stimulant abuse or dependence. Research staff administered a variety of measures that required a range of interviewing, technical, and clinical skills. PURPOSE: In order to address the absence of information on how research staff are trained for multisite clinical studies, the current manuscript describes the conceptual process of training and certifying research assistants for STRIDE. METHODS: Training was conducted using a three-stage process to allow staff sufficient time for distributive learning, practice, and calibration leading up to implementation of this complex study. RESULTS: Training was successfully implemented with staff across nine sites. Staff demonstrated evidence of study and procedural knowledge via quizzes and skill demonstration on six measures requiring certification. Overall, while the majority of staff had little to no experience in the six measures, all research assistants demonstrated ability to correctly and reliably administer the measures throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Practical recommendations are provided for training research staff and are particularly applicable to the challenges encountered with large, multisite trials.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Descriptions of and recommendations for meeting the challenges of training research staff for multisite studies are limited despite the recognized importance of training on trial outcomes. The STRIDE (STimulant Reduction Intervention using Dosed Exercise) study is a multisite randomized clinical trial that was conducted at nine addiction treatment programs across the United States within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) and evaluated the addition of exercise to addiction treatment as usual (TAU), compared to health education added to TAU, for individuals with stimulant abuse or dependence. Research staff administered a variety of measures that required a range of interviewing, technical, and clinical skills. PURPOSE: In order to address the absence of information on how research staff are trained for multisite clinical studies, the current manuscript describes the conceptual process of training and certifying research assistants for STRIDE. METHODS: Training was conducted using a three-stage process to allow staff sufficient time for distributive learning, practice, and calibration leading up to implementation of this complex study. RESULTS: Training was successfully implemented with staff across nine sites. Staff demonstrated evidence of study and procedural knowledge via quizzes and skill demonstration on six measures requiring certification. Overall, while the majority of staff had little to no experience in the six measures, all research assistants demonstrated ability to correctly and reliably administer the measures throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Practical recommendations are provided for training research staff and are particularly applicable to the challenges encountered with large, multisite trials.
Entities:
Keywords:
certification; multisite trials; research staff training; training; training recommendations
Authors: Benoit H Mulsant; Kari B Kastango; Jules Rosen; Roslyn A Stone; Sati Mazumdar; Bruce G Pollock Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Elizabeth Jeglic; Kenneth A Kobak; Nina Engelhardt; Janet B W Williams; Joshua D Lipsitz; Donna Salvucci; Heather Bryson; Kevin Bellew Journal: Int Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 1.659
Authors: Kenneth A Kobak; Joshua D Lipsitz; Janet B W Williams; Nina Engelhardt; Kevin M Bellew Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Jules Rosen; Benoit H Mulsant; Patricia Marino; Christopher Groening; Robert C Young; Debra Fox Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2008-08-30 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Hicham M Ibrahim; Thomas J Carmody; Bruce Arnow; Daniel N Klein; John C Markowitz; Philip T Ninan; Susan Kornstein; Rachel Manber; Michael E Thase; James H Kocsis; Martin B Keller Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-09-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Madhukar H Trivedi; Tracy L Greer; Bruce D Grannemann; Timothy S Church; Eugene Somoza; Steven N Blair; Jose Szapocznik; Mark Stoutenberg; Chad Rethorst; Diane Warden; Kolette M Ring; Robrina Walker; David W Morris; Andrzej S Kosinski; Tiffany Kyle; Bess Marcus; Becca Crowell; Neal Oden; Edward Nunes Journal: Trials Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Denise C Vidot; Chad D Rethorst; Tom J Carmody; Mark Stoutenberg; Robrina Walker; Tracy L Greer; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Gerald Cochran; Marcela C Smid; Elizabeth E Krans; M Aryana Bryan; Adam J Gordon; Brad Lundahl; John Silipigni; Benjamin Haaland; Ralph Tarter Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Lisa Armistead; William D Marelich; Debra A Murphy; Marya T Schulte; Nada Goodrum; Sae-Jin Kim Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 3.626