Food allergies are driven by aberrant T helper (Th) 2 cells. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) influences the development of Th2-mediated diseases, but its role in food allergy and tolerance remains unclear. To address this issue, we established mouse models presenting allergic or tolerant responses to ovalbumin (OVA). Mice sensitized with crude OVA developed Th2 responses including acute diarrhea, increases in serum OVA-specific IgE, dominant production of serum OVA-specific IgG1, increases in Th2-type cytokines and proliferation of mast cells in duodenal and colonic tissues. Sensitization of mice with crude OVA and LPS abrogated Th2-type responses observed in allergic mice. The level of OVA-specific proliferation in mesenteric lymph node CD4(+) T cells was comparable in allergic and tolerant mice, indicating that the tolerance is not caused by anergy and apoptosis of antigen-primed T cells. Expression of Th1- and Th2-type cytokines was suppressed in whole spleen cells and/or purified spleen CD4(+) T cells of tolerant mice, indicating that the tolerance was not caused by the shift from Th2 to Th1. On the other hand, interleukin (IL)-10, a regulatory cytokine produced by regulatory T cells, was upregulated in whole spleen cells and purified spleen CD4(+) T cells of tolerant mice. Furthermore, spleen CD4(+) T cells from tolerant mice suppressed the growth of CD4(+) T cells from DO11.10 mice in co-culture. These results indicate that tolerance is induced in allergic mice by simultaneous exposure to LPS during sensitization with OVA and that a population of T cells producing IL-10 plays an important role in the tolerance induction.
Food allergies are driven by aberrant T helper (Th) 2 cells. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) influences the development of Th2-mediated diseases, but its role in food allergy and tolerance remains unclear. To address this issue, we established mouse models presenting allergic or tolerant responses to ovalbumin (OVA). Mice sensitized with crude OVA developed Th2 responses including acute diarrhea, increases in serum OVA-specific IgE, dominant production of serum OVA-specific IgG1, increases in Th2-type cytokines and proliferation of mast cells in duodenal and colonic tissues. Sensitization of mice with crude OVA and LPS abrogated Th2-type responses observed in allergicmice. The level of OVA-specific proliferation in mesenteric lymph node CD4(+) T cells was comparable in allergic and tolerant mice, indicating that the tolerance is not caused by anergy and apoptosis of antigen-primed T cells. Expression of Th1- and Th2-type cytokines was suppressed in whole spleen cells and/or purified spleen CD4(+) T cells of tolerant mice, indicating that the tolerance was not caused by the shift from Th2 to Th1. On the other hand, interleukin (IL)-10, a regulatory cytokine produced by regulatory T cells, was upregulated in whole spleen cells and purified spleen CD4(+) T cells of tolerant mice. Furthermore, spleen CD4(+) T cells from tolerant mice suppressed the growth of CD4(+) T cells from DO11.10 mice in co-culture. These results indicate that tolerance is induced in allergicmice by simultaneous exposure to LPS during sensitization with OVA and that a population of T cells producing IL-10 plays an important role in the tolerance induction.
Food allergy is defined as an aberrant T helper (Th) 2-mediated immune response to a
dietary antigen[1], [2]. Cytokines produced by Th2 cells, such as
interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13, participate not only in dietary antigen-specific IgE
production but also in mucus secretion, muscle contraction, and eosinophil/mast cell
proliferation in intestinal tissues[1],
[3]. Mast cells express FcεRI,
which binds antigen-specific IgE. Upon reexposure to the dietary antigen, cross-linking of
the surface IgE stimulates mast cells to release a variety of chemical mediators, which can
induce food allergic symptoms, such as diarrhea and anaphylactic reactions[4].Components of environmental microbes are potent activators of the immune system with the
capacity to shift active immune responses towards priming of Th1 or Th2[5]. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a cell wall component
of Gram-negative bacteria, has the capacity to induce Th1-polarized adaptive immune
responses via toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 signaling[6], [7] and
exerts crucial effects on the development of asthma, which is a Th2-mediated allergic
disease[8],[9],[10],[11]. It has
also been shown that LPS exposure drives the development of Th2 airway hypersensitivity
through TLR4 signaling in murine models of pulmonary inflammation[12],[13],[14],[15]. It is
therefore likely that the condition of LPS determines the subsequent immune responses. In
the digestive tract, to maintain tolerance to food antigens, the immune system is strictly
controlled by several regulatory mechanisms, such as the enzymatic digestion of immunogenic
epitopes in food, the constitutive stimulation of gut-associated lymphoid tissue by
commensal flora and the action of unique cell populations with regulatory function. The
stimulation of gut-associated lymphoid tissue with noninvasive commensal microbiota has a
profound impact on the responsiveness of lymphocytes and the generation of Th1-biased memory
effector cells[16],[17],[18]. It also induces tolerance to orally administered
antigens[19]. Since LPS is contained in
commensal flora as a basic component with biological activity, it may function as a crucial
regulator for food allergy and produce tolerance to dietary antigens.The involvement of regulatory T cells (Treg) in food allergy has been reported[20], [21]. CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ Treg
participate in the induction of oral tolerance to cow’s milk and peanut extract
allergy[22], [23]. Treg producing IL-10, Tr1, inhibit
Th2-mediated allergic diarrhea and eosinophilic infiltration into the small intestine of
Peyer’s patch-lacking mice[24],
[25]. Treg producing transforming
growth factor (TGF)-β, Th3, are crucial for intestinal homeostasis. Food allergy and
anaphylaxis caused by impaired production of TGF-β can be prevented by administration of
TGF-β[26],[27],[28]. Recently, it has been shown that systemic stimulation with
LPS enhances the production of IL-10 and TGF-β in mice, suggesting that LPS regulates immune
responses to antigens through induction of Treg producing IL-10 or TGF-β[29], [30].In this study, to assess the role of LPS in food allergy, we sensitized BALB/c mice with
crude ovalbumin (OVA) (hereafter called cOVA) or with cOVA and LPS by intraperitoneal (i.p.)
injection. Th2-mediated allergy was observed in the former case, and tolerance was observed
in the latter case. The abrogation of the allergic reaction in tolerant mice was not due to
induction of anergy and apoptosis in primed T cells or to the shift from Th2 to Th1. On the
other hand, IL-10 expression was upregulated in spleen CD4+ T cells of tolerant
mice. These spleen CD4+ T cells suppressed the growth of CD4+ T cells
expressing an OVA-specific T cell receptor (TCR) in co-culture. These results indicate that
systemic exposure to LPS during OVA sensitization activates a population of CD4+
T cells producing IL-10, resulting in suppression of Th2-mediated allergic reactions.
Materials and Methods
Mice
Female BALB/c ByJ and BALB/c Cr mice were purchased from Clea Japan Inc. (Tokyo, Japan)
and Japan SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan), respectively. OVA323–339-specific TCR
transgenic mice (DO11.10) on a BALB/c background were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory
(Bar Harbor, ME, USA). All mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions and
used for experiments at 6–8 weeks of age.
Endotoxin activity in OVA
To evaluate the contamination of LPS in cOVA (Grade V, A-5503; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis,
Mo, USA) and purified OVA (hereafter called pOVA) (Profos AG, Regensburg, Germany),
endotoxin activities of cOVA and pOVA were examined by the Limulus
amebocyte lysate assay (Seikagaku Biobusiness Corp., Tokyo, Japan). LPS derived from
Escherichia coli 0013:H10 was used as a standard for endotoxin
activity. Endotoxin activity of cOVA was assayed after it was diluted so that the activity
fell within the linear range of the standard. pOVA was assayed for endotoxin activity
without dilution. The endotoxin activity of cOVA (5 μg/ml) and that of pOVA (5 μg/ml) were
estimated to be 52 EU/mg and < 1 EU/mg, respectively, based on the value of 545 nm
absorbance. For further experiments, cOVA was used as an antigen for in
vivo sensitization, and pOVA was used as that for ex vivo
stimulation.
Sensitization and challenge protocol
Based on a previous study about oral allergen-induced diarrhea, we generated the
following protocol for the food allergic and tolerant models[31]. Mice (n=3–10) were sensitized with 100 μg of cOVA by i.p.
injection with or without various doses of LPS derived from Escherichia
coli 055:B5 (LIST Biological Laboratories Inc., Campbell, CA, USA) in 200 μl
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) on days 0 and 14. Mice (n=3–5) sham sensitized with PBS on
days 0 and 14 were used as the control. One week after the second sensitization, mice were
orally challenged with 100 mg of cOVA in 250 μl of sterile saline at 2- or 3-day
intervals. Before each intragastric challenge, mice were deprived of food for 3–4 h to
minimize degradation of the antigen in the stomach. Mice were carefully monitored for 1 h
after each challenge, and those defecating profusely liquid stool were marked as acute
diarrhea positive. Diarrhea occurrence was assessed for 15–60 min after each challenge
with cOVA. Mice were sacrificed within 1 h after the last challenge. Blood was taken from
the femoral artery, and sera were prepared and stored at −20˚C until use. Duodenums
(approximately 10 cm distal to the stomach) and colons (distal part of the cecum) were
promptly removed. A part of each of these tissues was embedded in OCT compound (Sakura
Finetechnical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and the remaining tissues were quickly frozen and
stored at −80˚C until use. To characterize spleen or mesenteric lymph node (MLN) cells,
mice were sensitized with 100 μg of cOVA by i.p. injection with or without 100 μg of LPS
in 200 μl PBS on days 0 and 7. Mice sham sensitized with PBS on days 0 and 7 were used as
the control. Four days or 1 week after the second sensitization, spleens and MLNs were
removed. All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Hyogo
College of Medicine and performed in accordance with the criteria outlined in the “Guide
for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” prepared by the National Academy of
Sciences.
Cells and culture
Spleens and MLNs were removed from sensitized and control (PBS-sensitized) BALB/c ByJ
mice at the indicated days after the second sensitization and dispersed mechanically.
Single-cell suspensions from spleens and MLNs were prepared from the dispersed tissues by
passing through nylon mesh cell strainers (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA) and excluding
RBCs by lysis. CD4+ T cells were negatively selected from single-cell
suspensions by magnetic separation with a CD4+ T cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi
Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (> 95%
CD4+ T cells as determined by FACS analysis). Spleen CD4+ T cells
from naive DO11.10 mice were isolated in a similar manner.For preparation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), the spleens removed from naive BALB/c
ByJ and DO11.10 mice were cut into small pieces, treated with 400 Mandl units/ml
collagenase D (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and 10 μg/ml DNase I (Roche) with continuous
stirring at 37˚C for 35 min and incubated at 37˚C for 5 min after adding EDTA to adjust
the final concentration to 10 mM. Single cells were prepared from the spleen by vigorously
pipetting the suspension of small tissue pieces and passing the suspension through nylon
mesh cell strainers. After lysing of RBCs, the CD4+ T cell-depleted fraction
was isolated from the cell suspensions with a CD4+ T cell Isolation Kit
(Miltenyi Biotec). The isolated cells were irradiated at 30 Gray and used as APCs.All cells used in this study were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS at
37oC in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere.
OVA-specific proliferation assay
Co-culture of 3.5 × 105 MLN CD4+ T cells from control
(PBS-sensitized) and sensitized BALB/c ByJ mice was performed with 1 × 105 APCs
from BALB/c ByJ mice in the presence of the indicated concentration of pOVA in 96-well
flat bottom microplates for 72 h. MLN CD4+ T cells in each well were labeled
with 0.25 μCi [3H]-thymidine (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) for the last 12 h
of incubation, and the incorporated radioactivity in MLN CD4+ T cells was
measured by a liquid scintillation counter (TopCount, Packard BioScience Company, Meriden,
CT, USA).
Ex vivo co-culture assay
Co-culture of 5 × 105 spleen CD4+ T cells from naive DO11.10 mice
was performed with 5 × 105 nonirradiated or irradiated spleen CD4+ T
cells from sensitized BALB/c ByJ mice in the presence of pOVA (50 μg/ml) and 1 ×
105 APCs from DO11.10 mice in 96-well round bottom microplates for 72 h.
Cells in each well were labeled with 0.25 μCi [3H]-thymidine (PerkinElmer) for
the last 12 h of incubation, and the incorporated radioactivity was measured by a liquid
scintillation counter (TopCount).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for OVA-specific IgE, IgG and IgG2a
The level of serum OVA-specific IgE was measured by ELISA (Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma,
Tokyo, Japan). For measurement of serum OVA-specific IgG1 and IgG2a, sera were diluted
1:1,000 for IgG1, 1:10 for IgG2a and serially diluted 1:4. Immunoplates (Nalge Nunc
International, Naperville, IL, USA) were coated with 50 μg/ml cOVA in borate saline
containing 1% (W/V) bovineserum albumin (BSA) and incubated overnight at 4˚C. After
blocking with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature, serially diluted serum samples
were added into the immunoplates, and the immunoplates were incubated for 2 h at room
temperature. After washing with borate saline containing 1% BSA and 0.05% Tween-20,
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouseIgG1 diluted 1:1,000 (X56; BD Biosciences
Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) or horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouseIgG2a
diluted in 1:1,000 (R19–15; BD Biosciences Pharmingen) was added the immunoplates, and the
immunoplates were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The color reaction was developed
with 3,3ʼ,5,5ʼ-tetramethylbenzidine blue (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) for 30 min and stopped
by the addition with 6N HCl. Optical density (OD) was measured at 405 nm within 30 min.
Data represent OD values at a serum dilution of 1:125,000 for IgG1 and 1:50 for IgG2a,
which were in the middle of the linear part of the OD curve, respectively.
Immunohistochemistry
Frozen sections (6 μm) were prepared from OCT-embedded tissues and fixed with 10%
formalin. Sections were immunostained with rat anti-mousec-kit mAb (ACK2), a gift from
Dr. Shin-Ichi Nishikawa (Biohistory Research Hall, Osaka, Japan) and then with Histofine
Simple Stain mouse MAX-PO (Rat) (Nichirei Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Cells immunoreactive
for c-kit were visualized with Simple Stain DAB Solution (Nichirei). The sections were
lightly counterstained with hematoxylin. The average number of c-kit-positive cells in a
high-power field (HPF) was calculated from the total number of c-kit-positive cells in 10
HPFs of 5 mice.
Quantitative Real-time RT-PCR
Frozen tissues were immersed in RNA later (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) at 4˚C overnight.
Total RNA was extracted from the frozen tissues, whole spleen cells and CD4+ T
cells by using ISOGEN (Nippon Gene Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and reverse transcribed to
produce cDNA with a PrimeScript RT kit (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan). The expression of
Th1-, Th2- and Treg-type cytokine mRNA was examined by SYBR Green-based quantitative
real-time RT-PCR with 40 cycles of 5 seconds of denaturation at 95˚C, 30 seconds of
annealing at 64˚C and 15 seconds of dissociation at 95˚C with a TP800 Thermal Cycler
(Takara Bio Inc.). The amount of PCR products was analyzed by the standard curve method
and calculated by software (Multiplate RQ) with β-actin cDNA as an internal control. The
following oligonucleotides were used as primers for PCR:
5’-ACC-GTT-TAA-CCA-GAA-CGT-TGA-ATT-G-3’ (sense) and
5’-TCC-ACG-AAT-TTG-GAC-AGG-TTT-ACT-C-3’ (antisense) for the IL-3 gene,
5’-GGA-TGT-GCC-AAA-CGT-CCT-CAC-AGC-3’(sense) and 5’-GCT-TAT-CGA-TGA-ATC-CAG-GC-ATC-G-3’
(antisense) for the IL-4 gene, 5’-AAT-TCC-TGT-AGC-GCA-GGC-TGG-3’ (sense)
and 5’-TAC-TTG-AGA-CCC-TGA-TGC-AAC-G-3’ (antisense) for the IL-5 gene,
5’-CTG-AAG-ACC-CTC-AGG-ATG-CGG-CT-3’ (sense) and 5’-TCT-AGG-TCC-TGG-AGT-CCA-GCA-GAC-3’
(antisense) for the IL-10 gene, 5’-GCT-CAT-GGC-TGG-TGC-AAA-GA-3’ (sense)
and 5’-GAG-ACG-CCA-TTC-CAC-ATG-TCA-3’ (antisense) for the IL-12β gene,
5’-CGG-CAC-AGT-CAT-TGA-AAG-CCT-A-3’ (sense) and 5’-GTT-GCT-GAT-GGC-CTG-ATT-GTC-3’
(antisense) for the interferone (IFN)-γ gene,
5’-CAA-TTC-CTG-GCG-TTA-CCT-TGG-3’ (sense) and 5’-TGG-AGT-TTG-TTA-TCT-TTG-CTG-TCA-C-3’
(antisense) for the TGF-β gene and
5’-CAT-CCG-TAA-AGA-CCT-CTA-TGC-CAA-C-3’ (sense) and 5’-ATG-GAG-CCA-CCG-ATC-CAC-A-3’
(antisense) for the β-actin gene. The PCR products were confirmed by
electrophoresis in 0.7% agarose gel and staining with ethidium bromide.
Statistical analysis
Data are summarized as means ± standard deviations (SDs). Comparisons between two groups
and among three groups were made with the independent t-test and one-way
analysis of variance, followed by the post hoc pairwise independent
t-test, respectively. The multiplicity in pairwise comparisons was
corrected by Bonferroni’s procedure. All probability values are 2-sided, and values of
P<0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analysis was
performed using the SPSS software (version 17.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Establishment of an allergic model
BALB/c ByJ or BALB/c Cr mice were sensitized twice by i.p. injection of cOVA (100 μg)
prior to repeated intragastric challenges with a high dose of cOVA (100 mg) (Fig. 1A). Acute
diarrhea occurred in both strains, but BALB/c ByJ mice were found to be less sensitive to
lethal anaphylactic shock than BALB/c Cr mice (data not shown). BALB/c ByJ mice were
chosen for the following experiments.
Fig. 1.
Establishment of an
allergic model. (A) The experimental protocol for induction of allergy in mice.
BALB/c ByJ or BALB/c Cr mice were sensitized twice by i.p. injection of cOVA (100
μg) at a 2-week interval (black arrows) and then challenged by intragastric
administration (ig) of cOVA (100 mg) on the indicated days (white arrows). Mice were
sacrificed within 1 h after the last challenge (dotted arrow). Mice sensitized with
PBS were used as a control. (B) Incidence of diarrhea. cOVA-sensitized (closed
circle) (n=8) and PBS control BALB/c ByJ mice (open circle) (n=3) were monitored for
1 h, and diarrhea occurrence was assessed for 15 - 60 min after each challenge with
cOVA. Similar results were obtained in 5 experiments carried out in this study, and
the representative results are shown. (C) Allergic reactions of the alimentary
tract. (a) Mice sensitized with cOVA showed severe mucous diarrhea within 30 min
after challenge with cOVA. (b) The ceca and colons removed from cOVA-sensitized,
cOVA-challenged mice showed severe edematous and hyperemic changes and contained
watery soft feces after repeated oral challenges with cOVA, and (c) those from
control mice showed no edematous and hyperemic changes and contained solid
feces.
Establishment of an
allergic model. (A) The experimental protocol for induction of allergy in mice.
BALB/c ByJ or BALB/c Cr mice were sensitized twice by i.p. injection of cOVA (100
μg) at a 2-week interval (black arrows) and then challenged by intragastric
administration (ig) of cOVA (100 mg) on the indicated days (white arrows). Mice were
sacrificed within 1 h after the last challenge (dotted arrow). Mice sensitized with
PBS were used as a control. (B) Incidence of diarrhea. cOVA-sensitized (closed
circle) (n=8) and PBS control BALB/c ByJ mice (open circle) (n=3) were monitored for
1 h, and diarrhea occurrence was assessed for 15 - 60 min after each challenge with
cOVA. Similar results were obtained in 5 experiments carried out in this study, and
the representative results are shown. (C) Allergic reactions of the alimentary
tract. (a) Mice sensitized with cOVA showed severe mucous diarrhea within 30 min
after challenge with cOVA. (b) The ceca and colons removed from cOVA-sensitized,
cOVA-challenged mice showed severe edematous and hyperemic changes and contained
watery soft feces after repeated oral challenges with cOVA, and (c) those from
control mice showed no edematous and hyperemic changes and contained solid
feces.BALB/c ByJ mice sensitized with cOVA developed acute diarrhea after the 4th or 5th
challenge with cOVA (Fig. 1B). The diarrhea
usually occurred within 30 min after each challenge and lasted for at least 1 h (Fig. 1C). Mice also showed systemic manifestations,
such as hypothermia, less movement and hair ruffles. The ceca and colons removed from
these mice were severely edematous and hyperemic and contained watery soft feces (Fig. 1C). In contrast, no control mice sham
sensitized with PBS and challenged with cOVA developed diarrhea and systemic
manifestations during the experimental period (Fig.
1B). The ceca and colons removed from control mice showed no edematous and
hyperemic changes and contained solid feces (Fig.
1C). These results indicate that acute diarrhea resulted from immune reactions to
cOVA sensitization but not from an osmotic load and/or nonspecific irritation in the
digestive tract. In addition, the allergic reaction was induced, without an additional
exogenous adjuvant, in mice sensitized with cOVA and challenged with cOVA. Mice sensitized
with 100 μg cOVA, hereafter called allergicmice, are simple to produce and useful for
studying food allergic diseases.
Establishment of a tolerant model
Mice were simultaneously sensitized with a constant dose of cOVA (100 μg) and various
doses of LPS prior to cOVA challenges (Fig.
2A). The incidence of diarrhea decreased with
increasing doses of LPS, and the presence of 100 μg LPS completely abrogated diarrhea
(Fig. 2B). These results indicate that the
presence of a high dose of LPS during cOVA sensitization converted the allergic reactions
to tolerant ones against a dietary antigen even if mice were repeatedly challenged with
cOVA subsequently. The mice sensitized with 100 μg cOVA and 100 μg LPS, hereafter called
the tolerant mice/model, are useful for studying the mechanism by which tolerance to a
food allergy is induced in the digestive tract.
Fig. 2.
Prevention of diarrhea by simultaneous
sensitization with cOVA and LPS. (A) The experimental protocol for induction of
LPS-mediated tolerance in allergic mice. Mice were sensitized by simultaneous i.p.
injection of cOVA (100 μg) and various doses of LPS (striped arrows) twice and
repeatedly challenged by the intragastric administration (ig) of cOVA (100 mg) on
the indicated days (white arrows). Mice were sacrificed within 1 h after the last
challenge (dotted arrow). Allergic mice, sensitized with cOVA alone, were used as a
positive control, and PBS-sensitized mice were used as a negative control. (B)
Prevention of diarrhea. The incidence of diarrhea decreased with increasing doses of
LPS (▲ 0.1 μg (n=4) ■ 1 μg (n=4) and ♦ 100 μg (n=4)). The presence of LPS (100 μg)
completely abrogated diarrhea. Mice sensitized with cOVA alone and those sensitized
with PBS are indicated by closed (● (n=4)) and open (○ (n=3)) circles,
respectively. Similar results were obtained in 5 experiments carried out in this
study, and representative results are shown.
Prevention of diarrhea by simultaneous
sensitization with cOVA and LPS. (A) The experimental protocol for induction of
LPS-mediated tolerance in allergicmice. Mice were sensitized by simultaneous i.p.
injection of cOVA (100 μg) and various doses of LPS (striped arrows) twice and
repeatedly challenged by the intragastric administration (ig) of cOVA (100 mg) on
the indicated days (white arrows). Mice were sacrificed within 1 h after the last
challenge (dotted arrow). Allergicmice, sensitized with cOVA alone, were used as a
positive control, and PBS-sensitized mice were used as a negative control. (B)
Prevention of diarrhea. The incidence of diarrhea decreased with increasing doses of
LPS (▲ 0.1 μg (n=4) ■ 1 μg (n=4) and ♦ 100 μg (n=4)). The presence of LPS (100 μg)
completely abrogated diarrhea. Mice sensitized with cOVA alone and those sensitized
with PBS are indicated by closed (● (n=4)) and open (○ (n=3)) circles,
respectively. Similar results were obtained in 5 experiments carried out in this
study, and representative results are shown.
Cytokine profiles in the intestinal tissues
To ascertain the involvement of the Th2 immune response in the allergic model, we
examined the mRNA expression of Th1-, Th2- and Treg-type cytokines in duodenal and colonic
tissues of control, allergic and tolerant mice by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (Fig. 3A and B). The relative
expression of IL-3, IL-4 and IL-10 in allergicmice was higher than that in control mice.
On the other hand, the levels of IL-4 and IL-10 were almost the same in control and
tolerant mice. The IL-5, IFN-γ and TGF-β expression levels were almost equal among these
three types of mice. These results indicate that enhanced expression of Th2 cytokines,
IL-3 and IL-4 and IL-10, contributes to the induction of acute diarrhea in allergicmice
and that downregulation of these cytokines prevents acute diarrhea in tolerant mice. In
addition, it appears that IL-5, IFN-γ and TGF-β are not involved in the induction of
diarrhea in allergicmice and the prevention of diarrhea in tolerant mice.
Fig. 3.
The
expression of Th1-, Th2- and Treg-type cytokine mRNAs in duodenal and colonic
tissues. Th1-, Th2- and Treg-type cytokine mRNAs were measured by quantitative
real-time RT-PCR in duodenal (A) and colonic (B) tissues removed from control mice
(white columns), allergic mice (black columns) and tolerant mice (dotted columns).
Each value of mRNA expression was calibrated to that of β-actin expression. Each bar
represents the mean ± SD of 5 control mice, 5 tolerant mice and 6 allergic mice.
Significant differences (*P < 0.05) were found between columns
by the independent t-test with Bonferroni’s correction for pairwise
comparisons. In control mice, IL-3 mRNA was below the level of detection. Similar
results were obtained in 3 experiments, and representative results are
shown.
The
expression of Th1-, Th2- and Treg-type cytokine mRNAs in duodenal and colonic
tissues. Th1-, Th2- and Treg-type cytokine mRNAs were measured by quantitative
real-time RT-PCR in duodenal (A) and colonic (B) tissues removed from control mice
(white columns), allergicmice (black columns) and tolerant mice (dotted columns).
Each value of mRNA expression was calibrated to that of β-actin expression. Each bar
represents the mean ± SD of 5 control mice, 5 tolerant mice and 6 allergicmice.
Significant differences (*P < 0.05) were found between columns
by the independent t-test with Bonferroni’s correction for pairwise
comparisons. In control mice, IL-3 mRNA was below the level of detection. Similar
results were obtained in 3 experiments, and representative results are
shown.
OVA-specific antibodies in cOVA-challenged allergic and tolerant mice
We examined serum levels of OVA-specific IgE and serum titers of OVA-specific IgG1 and
IgG2a in control, allergic and tolerant mice by ELISA. The concentrations of OVA-specific
IgE were significantly higher in allergicmice (11.7 mg/ml) than in tolerant mice (1.5
mg/ml) (Fig. 4A). The titers of OVA-specific IgG1 were
undetectable, 2.53 at an OD of 405 nm and 1.51 at an OD of 405 nm in control, allergic and
tolerant mice, respectively (Fig 4B(a)). The
titers of OVA-specific IgG2a were undetectable, 0.25 at an OD of 405 nm and 2.92 at an OD
of 405 nm in control, allergic and tolerant mice, respectively (Fig. 4B(b)). Thus, the levels of OVA-specific IgG1 were
significantly higher in allergicmice than in control and tolerant mice, and the levels of
OVA-specific IgG2a were markedly reduced in allergicmice as compared with tolerant mice.
Additionally, the level of OVA-specific IgG1 was significantly higher than that of
OVA-specific IgG2a, suggesting that OVA-specific IgG1 was predominantly produced in
allergicmice. These data indicate that IgE-mediated Th2 immune responses participate in
the induction of food allergy in mice sensitized with cOVA.
Fig. 4.
Production of OVA-specific antibodies in allergic mice. Blood samples were obtained
from PBS-sensitized control, allergic and tolerant mice within 1 h after the last
challenge, and their sera were prepared. (A) Increases in OVA-specific IgE levels in
allergic mice. Serum levels of OVA-specific IgE were determined by ELISA. Each dot
indicates the OVA-specific IgE concentration in one mouse. We used control (n=5),
allergic (n=10) and tolerant (n=8) mice. (B) Increases in OVA-specific IgG1, but not
IgG2a, levels in allergic mice. The titers of OVA-specific IgG1 (a) and IgG2a (b) in
sera were determined by ELISA. Each dot indicates the values of OVA-specific IgG1
and IgG2a in one mouse. We used control (n=5), allergic (n=10) and tolerant (n=5)
mice. Lines depict mean values. ND, not detectable.
Production of OVA-specific antibodies in allergicmice. Blood samples were obtained
from PBS-sensitized control, allergic and tolerant mice within 1 h after the last
challenge, and their sera were prepared. (A) Increases in OVA-specific IgE levels in
allergicmice. Serum levels of OVA-specific IgE were determined by ELISA. Each dot
indicates the OVA-specific IgE concentration in one mouse. We used control (n=5),
allergic (n=10) and tolerant (n=8) mice. (B) Increases in OVA-specific IgG1, but not
IgG2a, levels in allergicmice. The titers of OVA-specific IgG1 (a) and IgG2a (b) in
sera were determined by ELISA. Each dot indicates the values of OVA-specific IgG1
and IgG2a in one mouse. We used control (n=5), allergic (n=10) and tolerant (n=5)
mice. Lines depict mean values. ND, not detectable.
Mast cells in cOVA-challenged allergic and tolerant mice
Mast cells are known to be effectors for allergic reactions. Immunostaining with an
antibody to c-kit, a marker of mast cells, showed that numerous c-kit-positive mast cells
infiltrated into the duodenal mucosa of allergicmice (Fig. 5A). In contrast, c-kit-positive mast cells were
hardly detectable in the duodenal mucosa of tolerant and control mice (Fig. 5A). The secondary antibody did not show a
nonspecific reaction. The number of mast cells in the duodenal mucosa was significantly
increased in allergicmice (Fig. 5B).
Proliferation of mast cells in allergicmice was also observed in the colonic mucosa (data
not shown). These results indicate that the acute diarrhea observed in allergicmice
results from extensive proliferation of intestinal mast cells and that tolerance is
induced by suppressing mast cell proliferation.
Fig. 5.
Involvement of mast cells in allergic
and tolerant mice. (A) Duodenal sections of allergic mice, tolerant mice and control
mice were immunostained with anti-c-kit antibody (ACK2). Numerous
mast cells infiltrated into the duodenal mucosa of allergic mice (a), but mast cells
were hardly detectable in the duodenal mucosa of tolerant mice (b) and control mice
(c). The secondary antibody does not show a nonspecific reaction (d). Scale bars
represent 200 μm. (B) Increase of mast cells in allergic mice. The numbers of mast
cells in the duodenal mucosa of allergic (n=5), tolerant (n=5) and control mice
(n=5) were counted under a light microscope. Each bar indicates the mean ± SD of 5
mice. Significant differences (*P < 0.01; **P < 0.005) were
found between columns by the independent t-test with Bonferroni’s
correction for pairwise comparisons.
Involvement of mast cells in allergic
and tolerant mice. (A) Duodenal sections of allergicmice, tolerant mice and control
mice were immunostained with anti-c-kit antibody (ACK2). Numerous
mast cells infiltrated into the duodenal mucosa of allergicmice (a), but mast cells
were hardly detectable in the duodenal mucosa of tolerant mice (b) and control mice
(c). The secondary antibody does not show a nonspecific reaction (d). Scale bars
represent 200 μm. (B) Increase of mast cells in allergicmice. The numbers of mast
cells in the duodenal mucosa of allergic (n=5), tolerant (n=5) and control mice
(n=5) were counted under a light microscope. Each bar indicates the mean ± SD of 5
mice. Significant differences (*P < 0.01; **P < 0.005) were
found between columns by the independent t-test with Bonferroni’s
correction for pairwise comparisons.
Antigen-specific responses of MLN CD4+ T cells in the allergic and
tolerant models
To examine whether the tolerant reaction against a dietary antigen is caused by anergy
and/or apoptosis of primed T cells in tolerant mice, we compared the proliferative ability
of MLN CD4+ T cells in response to pOVA stimulation between allergic and
tolerant mice. The level of [3H]-thymidine incorporation of CD4+ T
cells from tolerant mice was similar to that from allergicmice at a low dose of pOVA,
albeit higher than that from allergicmice at a high dose of pOVA (Fig. 6). In addition,
there was no apparent difference in the number of MLN lymphoid cells and their viability
between allergic and tolerant mice (data not shown). These results indicate that
abrogation of the allergic reaction in the tolerant mice is not due to the
unresponsiveness of CD4+ T cells to OVA restimulation and the decrease in MLN
cells caused by the apoptotic mechanism.
Fig. 6.
Proliferative ability
for OVA stimulation of MLN CD4+ T cells from allergic and tolerant mice.
MLNs were removed from control mice (n=5) (white columns), allergic mice (n=5)
(black columns) and tolerant mice (n=5) (dotted columns) 1 week after the second
sensitization. MLN CD4+ T cells were purified by magnetic separation and
co-cultured with APCs from BALB/c ByJ mice in the presence of the indicated
concentration of pOVA. Proliferative ability of MLN CD4+ T cells was
examined with a [3H]-thymidine incorporation assay (cpm). Each bar
represents the mean ± SD of 5 mice. Significant differences (*P
< 0.05; **P < 0.01) were found between columns by the independent
t-test with Bonferroni’s correction for pairwise comparisons.
Similar results were obtained in 3 experiments, and representative results are
shown.
Proliferative ability
for OVA stimulation of MLN CD4+ T cells from allergic and tolerant mice.
MLNs were removed from control mice (n=5) (white columns), allergicmice (n=5)
(black columns) and tolerant mice (n=5) (dotted columns) 1 week after the second
sensitization. MLN CD4+ T cells were purified by magnetic separation and
co-cultured with APCs from BALB/c ByJ mice in the presence of the indicated
concentration of pOVA. Proliferative ability of MLN CD4+ T cells was
examined with a [3H]-thymidine incorporation assay (cpm). Each bar
represents the mean ± SD of 5 mice. Significant differences (*P
< 0.05; **P < 0.01) were found between columns by the independent
t-test with Bonferroni’s correction for pairwise comparisons.
Similar results were obtained in 3 experiments, and representative results are
shown.
Cytokine profiles in the spleen
Whole spleen cells were prepared from control, allergic and tolerant mice, and the
expression of Th1-, Th2- and Treg-type cytokines was examined by quantitative real-time
RT-PCR (Fig. 7A). IL-4
expression in tolerant mice was similar to that in control mice and lower than that in
allergicmice. The levels of IFN-γ and TGF-β expression were comparable among control,
allergic and tolerant mice. IL-12 expression was markedly lower in tolerant mice than in
control and allergicmice. On the other hand, IL-10 expression was upregulated in tolerant
mice as compared with control and allergicmice. Next, CD4+ T cells were
isolated from spleen cells of control, allergic and tolerant mice, and the expression of
Th1-, Th2- and Treg-type cytokines was examined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR (Fig. 7B). IL-4 expression was comparable among
control, allergic and tolerant mice. IL-5 expression in tolerant mice was similar to that
in control mice and lower than that in allergicmice. IL-13 expression was lower in
tolerant mice than in control and allergicmice. IFN-γ expression was markedly lower in
tolerant mice than in control mice and slightly lower in tolerant mice than in allergicmice. IL-10 expression was markedly upregulated in tolerant mice as compared with control
and allergicmice. In addition, there was no apparent difference in TGF-β expression among
control, allergic and tolerant mice (data not shown). These results showed that the
cytokine profile in tolerant mice corresponded to neither a Th1- or Th2-mediated immune
response, indicating that the unresponsiveness to cOVA challenge in tolerant mice is not
caused by the shift from Th2 to Th1.
Fig. 7.
The
expression of Th2-, Th1- and Treg-type cytokine mRNA in whole spleen cells and
spleen CD4+ T cells. Spleens were removed from control mice (white
columns), allergic mice (black columns) and tolerant mice (dotted columns) 4 days
after the second sensitization. Total RNA was extracted from whole spleen cells (A)
and purified CD4+ T cells (B) and converted to cDNA. Expression of
cytokines at the mRNA level was examined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Each
value of mRNA expression was calibrated to that of β-actin expression. Each bar
represents the mean ± SD of 3 mice. Significant differences (*P
< 0.05; **P < 0.01) were found between columns by the independent
t-test with Bonferroni’s correction for pairwise comparisons.
Similar results were obtained in 3 experiments, and representative results are
shown.
The
expression of Th2-, Th1- and Treg-type cytokine mRNA in whole spleen cells and
spleen CD4+ T cells. Spleens were removed from control mice (white
columns), allergicmice (black columns) and tolerant mice (dotted columns) 4 days
after the second sensitization. Total RNA was extracted from whole spleen cells (A)
and purified CD4+ T cells (B) and converted to cDNA. Expression of
cytokines at the mRNA level was examined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Each
value of mRNA expression was calibrated to that of β-actin expression. Each bar
represents the mean ± SD of 3 mice. Significant differences (*P
< 0.05; **P < 0.01) were found between columns by the independent
t-test with Bonferroni’s correction for pairwise comparisons.
Similar results were obtained in 3 experiments, and representative results are
shown.
Effect of CD4+ T cells from tolerant mice on the proliferation of
OVA-specific CD4+ T cells from DO11.10 mice
To examine whether CD4+ T cells from tolerant mice have the capability to
suppress proliferation of OVA-specific CD4+ T cells, spleen CD4+ T
cells from naive DO11.10 mice, which contained a transgene that expressed OVA-specific TCR
in T cells, were co-cultured with either spleen CD4+ T cells from allergic or
tolerant mice in the presence of pOVA and APCs, and a [3H]-thymidine uptake
assay was performed in each co-culture. [3H]-thymidine incorporation in the
co-culture of DO11.10 CD4+ T cells with CD4+ T cells from allergicmice was almost equal to that in the culture of DO11.10 CD4+ T cells alone
(Fig. 8A). On the other
hand, [3H]-thymidine incorporation was remarkably decreased when DO11.10
CD4+ T cells were co-cultured with CD4+ T cells from tolerant
mice. In addition, the reduction of [3H]-thymidine incorporation in the
co-culture of DO11.10 CD4+ T cells with CD4+ T cells from tolerant
mice was dependent on the number of CD4+ T cells from tolerant mice (data not
shown).
Fig. 8.
Inhibition of DO11.10 CD4+ T cell proliferation by CD4+ T
cells from tolerant mice. Naive DO11.10 spleen CD4+ T cells
(5 × 105) were co-cultured with nonirradiated or irradiated spleen
CD4+ T cells (5 × 105) from allergic or tolerant mice in the
presence of pOVA (50 μg/ml) and APCs (1 × 105) from DO11.10 mice.
Proliferative ability of cells was examined with a [3H]-thymidine
incorporation assay (cpm). (A) [3H]-thymidine incorporation in the
co-culture of naive DO11.10 CD4+ T cells with CD4+ T cells
from allergic or tolerant mice. (B) [3H]-thymidine incorporation in the
coculture of naive DO11.10 CD4+ T cells with irradiated CD4+ T
cells from allergic or tolerant mice. The levels of [3H]-thymidine
incorporation of each cell culture and co-culture as designated below the graph are
shown. Each bar indicates the mean ± SD of triplicate cultures. Significant
differences (*P < 0.01) were found between columns by the independent
t-test with Bonferroni’s correction for pairwise comparisons.
Similar results were obtained in 3 experiments, and representative results are
shown.
Inhibition of DO11.10 CD4+ T cell proliferation by CD4+ T
cells from tolerant mice. Naive DO11.10 spleen CD4+ T cells
(5 × 105) were co-cultured with nonirradiated or irradiated spleen
CD4+ T cells (5 × 105) from allergic or tolerant mice in the
presence of pOVA (50 μg/ml) and APCs (1 × 105) from DO11.10 mice.
Proliferative ability of cells was examined with a [3H]-thymidine
incorporation assay (cpm). (A) [3H]-thymidine incorporation in the
co-culture of naive DO11.10 CD4+ T cells with CD4+ T cells
from allergic or tolerant mice. (B) [3H]-thymidine incorporation in the
coculture of naive DO11.10 CD4+ T cells with irradiated CD4+ T
cells from allergic or tolerant mice. The levels of [3H]-thymidine
incorporation of each cell culture and co-culture as designated below the graph are
shown. Each bar indicates the mean ± SD of triplicate cultures. Significant
differences (*P < 0.01) were found between columns by the independent
t-test with Bonferroni’s correction for pairwise comparisons.
Similar results were obtained in 3 experiments, and representative results are
shown.To estimate [3H]-thymidine uptake by growth of only DO11.10 CD4+ T
cells, DO11.10 CD4+ T cells were co-cultured with X ray-irradiated
CD4+ T cells from allergic or tolerant mice, and [3H]-thymidine
uptake was examined in each co-culture. The levels of [3H]-thymidine
incorporation in the co-culture of DO11.10 CD4+ T cells with X ray-irradiated
CD4+ T cells from allergic and tolerant mice were lower than that in the
culture of DO11.10 CD4+ T cells alone, but the levels of
[3H]-thymidine incorporation were comparable in X ray-irradiated
CD4+ T cells from allergic and tolerant mice (Fig. 8B). In addition, when the levels of [3H]-thymidine
incorporation in co-culture were compared between nonirradiated and X ray-irradiated
CD4+ T cells from tolerant mice, the level was higher in the co-culture with
X ray-irradiated CD4+ T cells than in that with nonirradiated CD4+ T
cells. These results showed that viable CD4+ T cells from tolerant mice are
able to suppress the growth of DO11.10 CD4+ T cells, suggesting that they
produce a suppressor for the OVA-specific response of DO11.10 CD4+ T cells.
Discussion
Food allergy is considered to be an aberrant Th2-mediated immune response against dietary
antigens[1], [2]. LPS, an outer wall component of Gram-negative
bacteria, is a potent activator of the immune system, and it may play a crucial role in T
cell priming[5]. Recent studies have
demonstrated that LPS exposure primes Th2 cells in airway allergy, but the role of LPS in
food allergy has not been well investigated[12],[13],[14],[15]. In the
present study, we established two distinct mouse models: one is an IgE-mediated, Th2-type
allergic model induced by cOVA sensitization alone, and the other is a tolerant model
induced by sensitization with both cOVA and LPS. In the allergic model, sensitization with
cOVA contaminated with a little LPS could induce Th2-mediated reactions in mice. In the
tolerant model, tolerance was increased with increasing doses of LPS during sensitization,
and a high dose (100 μg) of LPS completely suppressed Th2-mediated allergic reactions. These
results indicate that the development of food allergy may be induced by a low dose of LPS
exposure and prevented by a high dose of LPS exposure during sensitization.It is generally accepted that Th1 priming requires TLR4 signaling. It is also thought that
the priming of Th2 occurs through a default pathway at a low level of TLR signaling, but the
mechanism has been poorly defined[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11].
Regarding airway allergy, Eisenbarth et al. reported that a high dose of
LPS exposure during sensitization induces both IL-12 production and a Th1 response, whereas
a low dose of LPS exposure is not sufficient to induce a Th1 response but is required to
induce Th2inflammation[12]. In our model,
an IgE-mediated, Th2-type food allergy could be induced by cOVA sensitization. Because there
is a possibility that a little LPS contaminated the cOVA and influenced the induction of
allergic reactions, a low dose of LPS exposure during sensitization may play a crucial role
in the priming of Th2 in both airway and food allergic reactions. On the other hand, unlike
airway hypersensitivity, a high dose of LPS exposure failed to induce both IL-12 mRNA
expression and Th1-mediated responses in our model. The reason for this discrepancy may lie
in the environmental variation between the respiratory tract, where LPS is supplied mainly
from exogenous sources, and the digestive tract, where an abundance of LPS is constitutively
present.Endotoxin tolerance is a phenomenon in which cells or organisms exposed to a low dose of
endotoxin enter into a transient unresponsive state and are unable to respond to further
challenges with the endotoxin[32],
[33]. In endotoxin tolerance,
dendritic cells (DCs) and monocytes/macrophages are unresponsive to subsequent antigen
stimulation by downregulating the expression of MHC class II and co-stimulatory molecules.
It has been reported that endotoxin tolerance attenuates airway allergic inflammation
through direct suppression of the T-cell stimulatory effect of DCs[34]. On the other hand, in our food allergic and tolerant models,
MLN CD4+ T cells from tolerant mice showed sufficient antigen responses after
reexposure to the antigen. These results indicate that unresponsiveness in tolerant mice is
not caused by endotoxin tolerance.The production state of IL-12 is crucial to determine the subsequent acquired
immunity[13], [30], [35]. Upregulation of IL-12 is generally related to the induction
of Th1-mediated responses, and its downregulation is generally related to that of
Th2-mediated responses. It is therefore thought that downregulation of IL-12 results in
allergic reactions mediated by aberrant Th2 cells. However, IL-12 mRNA expression decreased
markedly in spleen cells of our tolerant mice, showing that the development of Th2-mediated
allergic reactions is prevented under IL-12 exhausted conditions. It is therefore likely
that factors other than IL-12 participate in the suppression of Th2-mediated allergic
reactions and the induction of tolerance. Our preliminary FACS analysis showed prominent
decreases in CD11Chigh DCs, which produce IL-12 and induce
Th1-mediated responses, in the spleen of tolerant mice (data not shown). So, it is possible
that downregulation of IL-12 mRNA expression is caused by a decrease in
CD11Chigh DCs in the spleen of tolerant mice.Several studies have shown the crucial role of Treg in allergic diseases[20], [21], [36]. The involvement of Treg producing TGF-β, Th3, in the induction of oral
tolerance and the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis has been reported[27], [28]. In our tolerant mice, upregulation of TGF-β mRNA expression
was not observed. These results indicate that TGF-β does not participate in the induction of
tolerance. On the other hand, the enhanced mRNA expression of IL-10, originally known as a
Th2-derived cytokine synthesis inhibitory factor, was clearly identified in our tolerant
mice. Groux et al. first reported Treg producing IL-10, Tr1, which suppress
antigen-specific immune responses and actively downregulate a pathological immune response
in vivo[37]. Subsequent studies have shown
that Tr1 are able to inhibit the development of airway allergic inflammation in mouse
models[21],
[38], [39]. In a similar way, Tr1
may be induced by sensitization with cOVA and LPS and regulate the immune response to OVA in
our tolerant mice. Wakkache et al. reported that
CD11clowCD45RBhigh DCs that produce IL-10 are enriched after LPS
stimulation, inducing the differentiation of Tr1[40]. In addition to the decrease in CD11Chigh DCs,
our preliminary FACS analysis showed that the proportion of
CD11clowCD45RBhigh DCs remarkably increased in the spleen of
tolerant mice (data not shown). There is a possibility that, in our tolerant mice, LPS
exposure during sensitization functions as a trigger for activation of
CD11clowCD45RBhigh DCs, promoting Tr1 development and IL-10
production by Tr1. Our tolerant mice may be useful in study of the function of
CD11clowCD45RBhigh DCs and Tr1 as crucial regulators for food
allergy.Thus, LPS is crucial for the regulation of Th2-mediated allergic reactions to dietary
antigens. Understanding of the mechanisms involved in the induction of LPS-induced
tolerogenic cells can potentially provide useful information for developing novel strategies
to prevent food allergy or to treat allergic disease by therapeutic manipulation of the
innate immune system.Declaration of Conflicting of Interests: The authors declare that they have no
conflicts of interest.
Authors: Eric B Brandt; Richard T Strait; Dan Hershko; Quan Wang; Emily E Muntel; Troy A Scribner; Nives Zimmermann; Fred D Finkelman; Marc E Rothenberg Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: A Poltorak; X He; I Smirnova; M Y Liu; C Van Huffel; X Du; D Birdwell; E Alejos; M Silva; C Galanos; M Freudenberg; P Ricciardi-Castagnoli; B Layton; B Beutler Journal: Science Date: 1998-12-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Wayne G Shreffler; Niya Wanich; Marla Moloney; Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn; Hugh A Sampson Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Stephanie C Eisenbarth; Damani A Piggott; James W Huleatt; Irene Visintin; Christina A Herrick; Kim Bottomly Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2002-12-16 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Caroline E Childs; Daniel Munblit; Laurien Ulfman; Carlos Gómez-Gallego; Liisa Lehtoranta; Tobias Recker; Seppo Salminen; Machteld Tiemessen; Maria Carmen Collado Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Katrine Lindholm Bøgh; Jolanda van Bilsen; Robert Głogowski; Iván López-Expósito; Grégory Bouchaud; Carine Blanchard; Marie Bodinier; Joost Smit; Raymond Pieters; Shanna Bastiaan-Net; Nicole de Wit; Eva Untersmayr; Karine Adel-Patient; Leon Knippels; Michelle M Epstein; Mario Noti; Unni Cecilie Nygaard; Ian Kimber; Kitty Verhoeckx; Liam O'Mahony Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 5.871