Literature DB >> 25377389

Inferior results of salvage arthrodesis after failed ankle replacement compared to primary arthrodesis.

Stefan Rahm1, Georg Klammer2, Emanuel Benninger2, Fabienne Gerber2, Mazda Farshad2, Norman Espinosa2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Up to now, there has been no evidence that salvage arthrodesis would perform inferior when compared with primary ankle arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to compare their clinical and radiographic results.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using 2 validated scores and assessment of radiographic union by comparing 23 patients who underwent salvage ankle arthrodesis (group SA = salvage arthrodesis) after failed total ankle replacement with 23 matched patients who received primary ankle arthrodesis (group PA = primary arthrodesis). The mean follow-up period was 38 (range 16-92) months in group SA and 56 (23-94) months in group PA.
RESULTS: Complete union was achieved in 17 patients (74%) after a mean time of 50 (13- 114) weeks in group SA and in 16 patients (70%) after a mean time of 23 (10-115) weeks in group PA. The SF-36 score averaged 48 points (7-80) in SA and 66 points (14-94; P = .006) in group PA. In group SA the mean FFI was 57% (22-82) for pain and 71% (44-98) for function. In group PA significantly better results for pain with 34% (0-88; P = .002) and function with 48% (1-92; P = .002) were found.
CONCLUSION: Salvage arthrodesis led to impaired life quality and reduced function combined with significantly higher pain when compared with primary ankle arthrodesis. These findings can be used to counsel our patients preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case series.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TAR; ankle; arthrodesis; failed total ankle replacement; salvage

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25377389     DOI: 10.1177/1071100714559272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  5 in total

1.  [Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement and conversion to ankle arthrodesis].

Authors:  M D Wimmer; M Hettchen; M M Ploeger; B Hintermann; D C Wirtz; A Barg
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  The AES total ankle arthroplasty analysis of failures and survivorship at ten years.

Authors:  Alexandre Di Iorio; Anthony Viste; Michel Henry Fessy; Jean Luc Besse
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Salvage options following failed total ankle arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Buchhorn; S F Baumbach; W Böcker; D Szymski; H Polzer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Application of a Customized Total Talar Prosthesis for Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shigeki Morita; Akira Taniguchi; Takuma Miyamoto; Hiroaki Kurokawa; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-10-28

5.  The outcomes of revision surgery for a failed ankle arthroplasty : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby Jennison; Claire Spolton-Dean; Hannah Rottenburg; Obioha Ukoumunne; Ian Sharpe; Andrew Goldberg
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.