Literature DB >> 25376610

Antitumor activity of the MEK inhibitor TAK-733 against melanoma cell lines and patient-derived tumor explants.

Lindsey N Micel1, John J Tentler2, Aik-Choon Tan3, Heather M Selby3, Kelsey L Brunkow3, Kelli M Robertson3, S Lindsey Davis3, Peter J Klauck3, Todd M Pitts3, Esha Gangolli4, Robyn Fabrey5, Shawn M O'Connell5, Patrick W Vincent5, S Gail Eckhardt3.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the activity of the selective MEK1/2 inhibitor TAK-733 in both melanoma cell lines and patient-derived melanoma xenograft models. In vitro cell proliferation assays using the sulforhodamine B assay were conducted to determine TAK-733 potency and melanoma responsiveness. In vivo murine modeling with eleven patient-derived melanoma explants evaluated daily dosing of TAK-733 at 25 or 10 mg/kg. Immunoblotting was performed to evaluate on-target activity and downstream inhibition by TAK-733 in both in vitro and in vivo studies. TAK-733 demonstrated broad activity in most melanoma cell lines with relative resistance observed at IC50 > 0.1 μmol/L in vitro. TAK-733 also exhibited activity in 10 out of 11 patient-derived explants with tumor growth inhibition ranging from 0% to 100% (P < 0.001-0.03). Interestingly, BRAF(V600E) and NRAS mutational status did not correlate with responsiveness to TAK-733. Pharmacodynamically, pERK was suppressed in sensitive cell lines and tumor explants, confirming TAK-733-mediated inhibition of MEK1/2, although the demonstration of similar effects in the relatively resistant cell lines and tumor explants suggests that escape pathways are contributing to melanoma survival and proliferation. These data demonstrate that TAK-733 exhibits robust tumor growth inhibition and regression against human melanoma cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models, suggesting that further clinical development in melanoma is of scientific interest. Particularly interesting is the activity in BRAF wild-type models, where current approved therapy such as vemurafenib has been reported not to be active. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25376610      PMCID: PMC4671492          DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-1012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  43 in total

1.  Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of B-RAF.

Authors:  Paul T C Wan; Mathew J Garnett; S Mark Roe; Sharlene Lee; Dan Niculescu-Duvaz; Valerie M Good; C Michael Jones; Christopher J Marshall; Caroline J Springer; David Barford; Richard Marais
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  An in vivo platform for translational drug development in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Belen Rubio-Viqueira; Antonio Jimeno; George Cusatis; Xianfeng Zhang; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; Collins Karikari; Chanjusn Shi; Kathleen Danenberg; Peter V Danenberg; Hidekazu Kuramochi; Koji Tanaka; Sharat Singh; Hossein Salimi-Moosavi; Nadia Bouraoud; Maria L Amador; Soner Altiok; Piotr Kulesza; Charles Yeo; Wells Messersmith; James Eshleman; Ralph H Hruban; Anirban Maitra; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations.

Authors:  Keith T Flaherty; Jeffery R Infante; Adil Daud; Rene Gonzalez; Richard F Kefford; Jeffrey Sosman; Omid Hamid; Lynn Schuchter; Jonathan Cebon; Nageatte Ibrahim; Ragini Kudchadkar; Howard A Burris; Gerald Falchook; Alain Algazi; Karl Lewis; Georgina V Long; Igor Puzanov; Peter Lebowitz; Ajay Singh; Shonda Little; Peng Sun; Alicia Allred; Daniele Ouellet; Kevin B Kim; Kiran Patel; Jeffrey Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  BRAF mutation predicts sensitivity to MEK inhibition.

Authors:  David B Solit; Levi A Garraway; Christine A Pratilas; Ayana Sawai; Gad Getz; Andrea Basso; Qing Ye; Jose M Lobo; Yuhong She; Iman Osman; Todd R Golub; Judith Sebolt-Leopold; William R Sellers; Neal Rosen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Activation of EphA receptor tyrosine kinase inhibits the Ras/MAPK pathway.

Authors:  H Miao; B R Wei; D M Peehl; Q Li; T Alexandrou; J R Schelling; J S Rhim; J R Sedor; E Burnett; B Wang
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 6.  Ultraviolet radiation and melanoma: a systematic review and analysis of reported sequence variants.

Authors:  Thomas Hocker; Hensin Tsao
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening.

Authors:  P Skehan; R Storeng; D Scudiero; A Monks; J McMahon; D Vistica; J T Warren; H Bokesch; S Kenney; M R Boyd
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-07-04       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Role of MAP kinase in tumor progression and invasion.

Authors:  Kaladhar B Reddy; Sanaa M Nabha; Natasha Atanaskova
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 9.  MEK inhibitors: a therapeutic approach to targeting the Ras-MAP kinase pathway in tumors.

Authors:  Judith S Sebolt-Leopold
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.116

10.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  10 in total

1.  A Chemical Probe Strategy for Interrogating Inhibitor Selectivity Across the MEK Kinase Family.

Authors:  Kristine K Deibler; Rama K Mishra; Matthew R Clutter; Aleksandar Antanasijevic; Raymond Bergan; Michael Caffrey; Karl A Scheidt
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.100

2.  A NOTCH1 gene copy number gain is a prognostic indicator of worse survival and a predictive biomarker to a Notch1 targeting antibody in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  John J Arcaroli; W M Tai; Ryan McWilliams; Stacey Bagby; Patrick J Blatchford; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Alicia Purkey; Kevin S Quackenbush; Eun-Kee Song; Todd M Pitts; Dexiang Gao; Chris Lieu; Martine McManus; Aik Choon Tan; Xianxian Zheng; Qin Zhang; Mark Ozeck; Peter Olson; Zhi-Qin Jiang; Scott Kopetz; Antonio Jimeno; Stephen Keysar; Gail Eckhardt; Wells A Messersmith
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 3.  Targeting mutant NRAS signaling pathways in melanoma.

Authors:  Ha Linh Vu; Andrew E Aplin
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 7.658

4.  Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 3-Arylindazoles as Selective MEK4 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Kristine K Deibler; Gary E Schiltz; Matthew R Clutter; Rama K Mishra; Purav P Vagadia; Matthew O'Connor; Mariam Donny George; Ryan Gordon; Graham Fowler; Raymond Bergan; Karl A Scheidt
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  MEK inhibitor, TAK-733 reduces proliferation, affects cell cycle and apoptosis, and synergizes with other targeted therapies in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P de la Puente; B Muz; A Jin; F Azab; M Luderer; N N Salama; A K Azab
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 11.037

6.  MIG6 Is MEK Regulated and Affects EGF-Induced Migration in Mutant NRAS Melanoma.

Authors:  Ha Linh Vu; Sheera Rosenbaum; Claudia Capparelli; Timothy J Purwin; Michael A Davies; Adam C Berger; Andrew E Aplin
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  Whole-exome sequencing identifies recurrent SF3B1 R625 mutation and comutation of NF1 and KIT in mucosal melanoma.

Authors:  Jennifer D Hintzsche; Nicholas T Gorden; Carol M Amato; Jihye Kim; Kelsey E Wuensch; Steven E Robinson; Allison J Applegate; Kasey L Couts; Theresa M Medina; Keith R Wells; Joshua A Wisell; Martin D McCarter; Neil F Box; Yiqun G Shellman; Rene C Gonzalez; Karl D Lewis; John J Tentler; Aik Choon Tan; William A Robinson
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  A phase I dose-escalation study of TAK-733, an investigational oral MEK inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Alex A Adjei; Patricia LoRusso; Antoni Ribas; Jeffrey A Sosman; Anna Pavlick; Grace K Dy; Xiaofei Zhou; Esha Gangolli; Michelle Kneissl; Stephanie Faucette; Rachel Neuwirth; Viviana Bózon
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 9.  Review on the Synthesis and Therapeutic Potential of Pyrido[2,3-d], [3,2-d], [3,4-d] and [4,3-d]pyrimidine Derivatives.

Authors:  Joana F Campos; Thierry Besson; Sabine Berteina-Raboin
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-14

10.  Identification of New Vulnerabilities in Conjunctival Melanoma Using Image-Based High Content Drug Screening.

Authors:  Katya Nardou; Michael Nicolas; Fabien Kuttler; Katarina Cisarova; Elifnaz Celik; Mathieu Quinodoz; Nicolo Riggi; Olivier Michielin; Carlo Rivolta; Gerardo Turcatti; Alexandre Pierre Moulin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.