| Literature DB >> 25374697 |
Melinda K Harman1, Stephanie J Bonin2, Chris J Leslie3, Scott A Banks4, W Andrew Hodge5.
Abstract
Evidence for selecting the same total knee arthroplasty prosthesis whether the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is retained or resected is rarely documented. This study reports prospective midterm clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes of a fixed-bearing design implanted using two different surgical techniques. The PCL was completely retained in 116 knees and completely resected in 43 knees. For the entire cohort, clinical knee (96 ± 7) and function (92 ± 13) scores and radiographic outcomes were good to excellent for 84% of patients after 5-10 years in vivo. Range of motion averaged 124° ± 9°, with 126 knees exhibiting ≥120° flexion. Small differences in average knee flexion and function scores were noted, with the PCL-resected group exhibiting an average of 5° more flexion but an average function score that was 7 points lower compared to the PCL-retained group. Fluoroscopic analysis of 33 knees revealed stable tibiofemoral translations. This study demonstrates that a TKA articular design with progressive congruency in the lateral compartment can provide for femoral condyle rollback in maximal flexion activities and achieve good clinical and functional performance in patients with PCL-retained and PCL-resected TKA. This TKA design proved suitable for use with either surgical technique, providing surgeons with the choice of maintaining or sacrificing the PCL.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25374697 PMCID: PMC4206927 DOI: 10.1155/2014/178156
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Orthop ISSN: 2090-3464
Figure 1The 3D Knee is a fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis suitable for use in PCL-retained or PCL-resected TKA.
Figure 2The 3D Knee fixed-bearing TKA design incorporates a hemispherical lateral condyle and tibial articulation to provide definitive AP translational control while providing for proper axial rotation. The asymmetric femoral component incorporates a constant sagittal radius from −15° to 80° while providing progressively decreasing articular constraint with higher flexion to allow femoral condyle rollback. The posterior condyles are shaped to provide maximum posterior condylar offset late in the flexion arc.
Figure 3In vivo sagittal plane fluoroscopic images acquired during kneeling and lunge activities (a, b) were analyzed using a shape-matching procedure for fitting the prosthesis surface models to the image silhouettes (c, d) and calculating the position and orientation of the femoral component relative to the tibial component (e, f).
Patient demographics and outcome measures for all TKA and for the PCL-retained and PCL-resected groups.
| All TKA | PCL-retained | PCL-resected |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | 159 | 116 | 43 | |
| Sex (F/M, % female) | 98/61 (62%) | 65/51 (56%) | 33/10 (77%) | |
| Age at index surgery (yrs.) | 70 ± 9 | 72 ± 7 | 64 ± 9 | <0.001 |
| Age at last follow-up (yrs.) | 76 ± 8 | 78 ± 7 | 71 ± 9 | <0.001 |
| KSS (knee) | 96 ± 7 | 96 ± 7 | 96 ± 5 | 0.76 |
| KSS (function) | 92 ± 13 | 94 ± 12 | 87 ± 14 | 0.003 |
| Maximum knee flexion (°) | 124 ± 9 | 122 ± 9 | 127 ± 9 | 0.002 |
*Significant differences between the PCL-retained and PCL-resected groups were assessed using a Student's t-test.
Kinematics during the kneeling and lunge activities for the PCL-retained and PCL-resected groups (mean ± standard deviation, range).
| Nonweight bearing kneeling | Weight bearing lunge | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCL-retained | PCL-resected |
| PCL-retained | PCL-resected |
| |
| Patients | 20 | 13 | 20 | 10 | ||
| Skeletal knee flexion (°) | 131 ± 13 | 124 ± 11 | 0.15 | 120 ± 11 | 123 ± 17 | 0.54 |
| Implant valgus (°) | −1 ± 2 | 1 ± 3 | 0.02 | −1 ± 1 | 1 ± 2 | 0.00 |
| Tibial external rotation (°) | −10 ± 4 | −10 ± 6 | 0.75 | −11 ± 4 | −9 ± 4 | 0.25 |
| Medial condyle AP (mm) | −2 ± 4 | 2 ± 4 | 0.02 | 0 ± 4 | −2 ± 4 | 0.22 |
| Lateral Condyle AP (mm) | −10 ± 4 | −5 ± 4 | 0.01 | −8 ± 4 | −9 ± 3 | 0.41 |
*Significant differences between the PCL-retained and PCL-resected groups were assessed using a Student's t-test.