| Literature DB >> 25374544 |
William J Kowalski1, Kerem Pekkan2, Joseph P Tinney1, Bradley B Keller3.
Abstract
Innovative research on the interactions between biomechanical load and cardiovascular (CV) morphogenesis by multiple investigators over the past 3 decades, including the application of bioengineering approaches, has shown that the embryonic heart adapts both structure and function in order to maintain cardiac output to the rapidly growing embryo. Acute adaptive hemodynamic mechanisms in the embryo include the redistribution of blood flow within the heart, dynamic adjustments in heart rate and developed pressure, and beat to beat variations in blood flow and vascular resistance. These biomechanically relevant events occur coincident with adaptive changes in gene expression and trigger adaptive mechanisms that include alterations in myocardial cell growth and death, regional and global changes in myocardial architecture, and alterations in central vascular morphogenesis and remodeling. These adaptive mechanisms allow the embryo to survive these biomechanical stresses (environmental, maternal) and to compensate for developmental errors (genetic). Recent work from numerous laboratories shows that a subset of these adaptive mechanisms is present in every developing multicellular organism with a "heart" equivalent structure. This chapter will provide the reader with an overview of some of the approaches used to quantify embryonic CV functional maturation and performance, provide several illustrations of experimental interventions that explore the role of biomechanics in the regulation of CV morphogenesis including the role of computational modeling, and identify several critical areas for future investigation as available experimental models and methods expand.Entities:
Keywords: biomechanics; cardiovascular development; computational modeling; congenital heart disease; embryo; hemodynamics
Year: 2014 PMID: 25374544 PMCID: PMC4204442 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Comparative timeline of events in cardiovascular development expressed as days post fertilization.
| Gestation/Incubation period | 20 days | 21 days | 9 months | ||
| Linear heart tube | 1 | 1.67 (32) | 8 | 1.29 (9) | 28 (10) |
| First heartbeat | 1 | 1.83 (33) | 8 | 1.29 (9) | 28 (10) |
| Onset of blood flow | 1 | 1.83 (33) | 8.5 | 1.46 (10) | 29 (11) |
| Cardiac looping | 1–2 | 1.67–2.75 (32–40) | 8–10.5 | 1.46–4 (10–24) | 28–32 (10–13) |
| Onset of ventricular trabeculation | 2 | 3.17 (41) | 9.5 | 2.23 (16) | 29 (11) |
| Atrial septation | 3.83–4.42 (44-46) | 10–14.5 | 2.23–10 (16–36) | 30–46 (12–19) | |
| Ventricular septation | 9–14 | 2.42–8(17–34) | 30–46 (12–19) | ||
| Atrioventricular cushions form | 2 | 2.33 (39) | 10 | 2.23 (16) | 32 (13) |
| Outflow tract cushions form | 2.33 (39) | 10 | 3.23 (19) | 32 (13) |
The numbers in parentheses represents standardized stages, if applicable. Sissman, .
Comparison of .
| Confocal | 1 | 0.2 |
| MPM | 1 | 2 |
| micro-CT | 1–25 | 80 |
| MRM | 30 | 100 |
| High frequency ultrasound | 30 | 35 |
| OCT | 4 | 2 |
Peak velocity measurements in normal embryos.
| Chick | HH25 | Atrioventricular canal | 17.1 | Ultrasound | Butcher et al., |
| Chick | HH21 | Inflow tract | 5.0 | Ultrasound | Oosterbaan et al., |
| Outflow tract | 6.1 | ||||
| Mouse | day 14.5 | Mitral | 34.4 | Ultrasound | Zhou et al., |
| Tricuspid | 33.4 | ||||
| Chick | HH18 | Outflow tract | 7.8 | Doppler-OCT | Rugonyi et al., |
| Mouse | day 9.5 | Dorsal aorta | 0.8 | Doppler-OCT | Larina et al., |
| Quail | HH14 | Inflow tract | 2.62 | Doppler-OCT | Jenkins et al., |
| Outflow tract | 5.1 | ||||
| Chick | HH17 | Vitelline | 0.32 | Doppler-OCT | Davis et al., |
| Chick | HH15 | Ventricle | 2.6 | PIV | Vennemann et al., |
| Chick | HH18 | Vitelline | 0.08 | PIV | Poelma et al., |
| Chick | HH18 | Vitelline | 0.1 | OCT-PIV | Chen et al., |
Figure 1Cardiac output increases exponentially during development. Flow was measured using pulsed-Doppler ultrasound in chick embryos.
Figure 2Reynolds and Womersley numbers in the chick embryo dorsal aorta. Flow and diameter data are based on Hu and Clark (1989), Broekhuizen et al. (1993). Viscosity is taken from Al-Roubaie et al. (2011). Blood density is assumed to be 1025 kg/m3.
Peak WSS values in normal embryos.
| Quail | HH14 | Heart | 8.40 | OCT | Jenkins et al., |
| Quail | HH14 | Heart | 8.10 | OCT | Peterson et al., |
| Chick | HH17 | Outflow tract | 3.00 | PIV | Poelma et al., |
| Chick | HH17 | Atrioventricular canal | 1.93 | CFD | Yalcin et al., |
| HH23 | 7.83 | ||||
| HH27 | 25.01 | ||||
| HH30 | 28.72 | ||||
| Chick | HH18 | Aortic arches | 5.47 | CFD | Wang et al., |
| HH24 | 9.56 | ||||
| Chick | HH16 | Outflow tract | 1.82 | CFD | Bharadwaj et al., |
| HH23 | 5.82 | ||||
| HH27 | 23.61 | ||||
| HH30 | 53.61 | ||||
| Chick | HH18 | Outflow tract | 6.00 | CFD | Liu et al., |
| Chick | HH17 | Outflow tract | 3.20 | PIV | Poelma et al., |
Figure 3End diastolic and peak systolic ventricular pressures (EDVP, PSVP). PSVP increases faster than EDVP, resulting in an increase in pulse pressure.
Vascular hemodynamic properties of the normal chick embryo.
| HH18 | 2.95 | 9.3 | 1.14 | 48 |
| HH21 | 2.05 | 20.0 | 1.48 | 108 |
| HH24 | 1.21 | 41.3 | 1.82 | 296 |
| HH27 | 0.83 | 89.3 | 2.51 | 1054 |
| HH29 | 0.63 | 138.9 | 3.04 | 2203 |
References: Hu and Clark, .
Figure 4Aortic arch peak flow wall shear stress (WSS) distribution for HH 18, 21, and 24 chick embryos. WSS is computed based on a CFD model. Aortic arches are viewed from a left oblique angle and numbered by roman numeral (II-VI). In order to display a broader range, a peak WSS of 350 dynes/cm2 is shown. Adapted from Wang et al. (2009), Kowalski et al. (2013).
Figure 5HH21 chick embryo model. Right panel: a normal embryo viewed from the right lateral with major vascular structures labeled. Left panel: a repositioned left side up embryo after LAL viewed from the left lateral to illustrate the ligated left atrium. Scale bars = 500 μm.