Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds1, Fatima McKenzie2, Janet E Panoch3, Lucia D Wocial4, Amber E Barnato5, Richard M Frankel6. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA. Electronic address: btuckere@iupui.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA. Electronic address: fmckenzi@iupui.edu. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA. Electronic address: jpanoch@iupui.edu. 4. Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indianapolis, USA. Electronic address: lwocial@iuhealth.org. 5. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA. Electronic address: barnatoae@upmc.edu. 6. Mary Margaret Walther Center for Research and Education in Palliative Care, IU Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, USA. Electronic address: rfrankel@iupui.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively assess obstetricians' and neonatologists' responses to standardized patients (SPs) asking "What would you do?" during periviable counseling encounters. METHODS: An exploratory single-center simulation study. SPs, portraying a pregnant woman presenting with ruptured membranes at 23 weeks, were instructed to ask, "What would you do?" if presented options regarding delivery management or resuscitation. Responses were independently reviewed and classified. RESULTS: We identified five response patterns: 'Disclose' (9/28), 'Don't Know' (11/28), 'Deflect' (23/28), 'Decline' (2/28), and 'Ignore' (2/28). Most physicians utilized more than one response pattern (22/28). Physicians 'deflected' the question by: restating or offering additional medical information; answering with a question; evoking a hypothetical patient; or redirecting the SP to other sources of support. When compared with neonatologists, obstetricians (40% vs. 15%) made personal or professional disclosures more often. Though both specialties readily acknowledged the importance of values in making a decision, only one physician attempted to elicit the patient's values. CONCLUSION: "What would you do?" represented a missed opportunity for values elicitation. Interventions are needed to facilitate values elicitation and shared decision-making in periviable care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: If physicians fail to address patients' values and goals, they lack the information needed to develop patient-centered plans of care.
OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively assess obstetricians' and neonatologists' responses to standardized patients (SPs) asking "What would you do?" during periviable counseling encounters. METHODS: An exploratory single-center simulation study. SPs, portraying a pregnant woman presenting with ruptured membranes at 23 weeks, were instructed to ask, "What would you do?" if presented options regarding delivery management or resuscitation. Responses were independently reviewed and classified. RESULTS: We identified five response patterns: 'Disclose' (9/28), 'Don't Know' (11/28), 'Deflect' (23/28), 'Decline' (2/28), and 'Ignore' (2/28). Most physicians utilized more than one response pattern (22/28). Physicians 'deflected' the question by: restating or offering additional medical information; answering with a question; evoking a hypothetical patient; or redirecting the SP to other sources of support. When compared with neonatologists, obstetricians (40% vs. 15%) made personal or professional disclosures more often. Though both specialties readily acknowledged the importance of values in making a decision, only one physician attempted to elicit the patient's values. CONCLUSION: "What would you do?" represented a missed opportunity for values elicitation. Interventions are needed to facilitate values elicitation and shared decision-making in periviable care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: If physicians fail to address patients' values and goals, they lack the information needed to develop patient-centered plans of care.
Authors: Kartik K Venkatesh; Courtney D Lynch; Maged M Costantine; Carl H Backes; Jonathan L Slaughter; Heather A Frey; Xiaoning Huang; Mark B Landon; Mark A Klebanoff; Sadiya S Khan; William A Grobman Journal: JAMA Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: R Geurtzen; J F M van den Heuvel; J J Huisman; E M Lutke Holzik; M N Bekker; M Hogeveen Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Nina P Tamirisa; James S Goodwin; Arti Kandalam; Suzanne K Linder; Susan Weller; Stella Turrubiate; Colleen Silva; Taylor S Riall Journal: Health Expect Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 3.377