Literature DB >> 25371549

Complementary effects of gaze direction and early saliency in guiding fixations during free viewing.

Ali Borji1, Daniel Parks2, Laurent Itti3.   

Abstract

Gaze direction provides an important and ubiquitous communication channel in daily behavior and social interaction of humans and some animals. While several studies have addressed gaze direction in synthesized simple scenes, few have examined how it can bias observer attention and how it might interact with early saliency during free viewing of natural and realistic scenes. Experiment 1 used a controlled, staged setting in which an actor was asked to look at two different objects in turn, yielding two images that differed only by the actor's gaze direction, to causally assess the effects of actor gaze direction. Over all scenes, the median probability of following an actor's gaze direction was higher than the median probability of looking toward the single most salient location, and higher than chance. Experiment 2 confirmed these findings over a larger set of unconstrained scenes collected from the Web and containing people looking at objects and/or other people. To further compare the strength of saliency versus gaze direction cues, we computed gaze maps by drawing a cone in the direction of gaze of the actors present in the images. Gaze maps predicted observers' fixation locations significantly above chance, although below saliency. Finally, to gauge the relative importance of actor face and eye directions in guiding observer's fixations, in Experiment 3, observers were asked to guess the gaze direction from only an actor's face region (with the rest of the scene masked), in two conditions: actor eyes visible or masked. Median probability of guessing the true gaze direction within ±9° was significantly higher when eyes were visible, suggesting that the eyes contribute significantly to gaze estimation, in addition to face region. Our results highlight that gaze direction is a strong attentional cue in guiding eye movements, complementing low-level saliency cues, and derived from both face and eyes of actors in the scene. Thus gaze direction should be considered in constructing more predictive visual attention models in the future.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bottom-up saliency; eye movements; fixation prediction; free viewing; gaze cueing; gaze direction; gaze following; human–computer interaction; line of sight; overt attention; saliency modeling; top-down attention; visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25371549     DOI: 10.1167/14.13.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  15 in total

1.  Genetic Influence on Eye Movements to Complex Scenes at Short Timescales.

Authors:  Daniel P Kennedy; Brian M D'Onofrio; Patrick D Quinn; Sven Bölte; Paul Lichtenstein; Terje Falck-Ytter
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  The role of meaning in attentional guidance during free viewing of real-world scenes.

Authors:  Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-11

3.  Meaning guides attention during scene viewing, even when it is irrelevant.

Authors:  Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The interplay between gaze and consistency in scene viewing: Evidence from visual search by young and older adults.

Authors:  Eunice G Fernandes; Louise H Phillips; Gillian Slessor; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The "Social Gaze Space": A Taxonomy for Gaze-Based Communication in Triadic Interactions.

Authors:  Mathis Jording; Arne Hartz; Gary Bente; Martin Schulte-Rüther; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-26

6.  Social content and emotional valence modulate gaze fixations in dynamic scenes.

Authors:  Marius Rubo; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Prior expectations about where other people are likely to direct their attention systematically influence gaze perception.

Authors:  Peter C Pantelis; Daniel P Kennedy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Deconstructing atypical eye gaze perception in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Peter C Pantelis; Daniel P Kennedy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Center Bias Does Not Account for the Advantage of Meaning Over Salience in Attentional Guidance During Scene Viewing.

Authors:  Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-28

10.  Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene Description.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Taylor R Hayes; Gwendolyn Rehrig; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.