Literature DB >> 31302302

The role of meaning in attentional guidance during free viewing of real-world scenes.

Candace E Peacock1, Taylor R Hayes2, John M Henderson3.   

Abstract

In real-world vision, humans prioritize the most relevant visual information at the expense of other information via attentional selection. The current study sought to understand the role of semantic features and image features on attentional selection during free viewing of real-world scenes. We compared the ability of meaning maps generated from ratings of isolated, context-free image patches and saliency maps generated from the Graph-Based Visual Saliency model to predict the spatial distribution of attention in scenes as measured by eye movements. Additionally, we introduce new contextualized meaning maps in which scene patches were rated based upon how informative or recognizable they were in the context of the scene from which they derived. We found that both context-free and contextualized meaning explained significantly more of the overall variance in the spatial distribution of attention than image salience. Furthermore, meaning explained early attention to a significantly greater extent than image salience, contrary to predictions of the 'saliency first' hypothesis. Finally, both context-free and contextualized meaning predicted attention equivalently. These results support theories in which meaning plays a dominant role in attentional guidance during free viewing of real-world scenes.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Context; Eye movements; Meaning; Saliency; Scene perception

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31302302      PMCID: PMC6690792          DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  38 in total

Review 1.  High-level scene perception.

Authors:  J M Henderson; A Hollingworth
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Oculomotor strategies for the direction of gaze tested with a real-world activity.

Authors:  Kathleen A Turano; Duane R Geruschat; Frank H Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Scene context guides eye movements during visual search.

Authors:  Mark B Neider; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search.

Authors:  Antonio Torralba; Aude Oliva; Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition.

Authors:  Aude Oliva; Antonio Torralba
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  How does the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual salience in scene perception?

Authors:  Tom Foulsham; Geoffrey Underwood
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention.

Authors:  Derrick Parkhurst; Klinton Law; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Modeling the influence of task on attention.

Authors:  Vidhya Navalpakkam; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Low-level visual saliency does not predict change detection in natural scenes.

Authors:  Jonathan A Stirk; Geoffrey Underwood
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.

Authors:  John M Henderson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  9 in total

1.  Where the action could be: Speakers look at graspable objects and meaningful scene regions when describing potential actions.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Rehrig; Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Scene meaningfulness guides eye movements even during mind-wandering.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Nicola C Anderson; Kevin F Miller
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Rapid Extraction of the Spatial Distribution of Physical Saliency and Semantic Informativeness from Natural Scenes in the Human Brain.

Authors:  John E Kiat; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Look at what I can do: Object affordances guide visual attention while speakers describe potential actions.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Rehrig; Madison Barker; Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention.

Authors:  Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Semantic object-scene inconsistencies affect eye movements, but not in the way predicted by contextualized meaning maps.

Authors:  Marek A Pedziwiatr; Matthias Kümmerer; Thomas S A Wallis; Matthias Bethge; Christoph Teufel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  When scenes speak louder than words: Verbal encoding does not mediate the relationship between scene meaning and visual attention.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Rehrig; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10

8.  Center Bias Does Not Account for the Advantage of Meaning Over Salience in Attentional Guidance During Scene Viewing.

Authors:  Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-28

9.  Meaning and expected surfaces combine to guide attention during visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Candace E Peacock; Deborah A Cronin; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.