P Tschandl1, H Kittler1, K Schmid2, I Zalaudek3, G Argenziano3. 1. Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 2. Department of Psychology, Karl Franzens University Graz, Graz, Austria. 3. Skin Cancer Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are two strategies to approach the dermatoscopic diagnosis of pigmented skin tumours, namely the verbal-based analytic and the more visual-global heuristic method. It is not known if one or the other is more efficient in teaching dermatoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To compare two teaching methods in short-term training of dermatoscopy to medical students. METHODS: Fifty-seven medical students in the last year of the curriculum were given a 1-h lecture of either the heuristic- or the analytic-based teaching of dermatoscopy. Before and after this session, they were shown the same 50 lesions and asked to diagnose them and rate for chance of malignancy. Test lesions consisted of melanomas, basal cell carcinomas, nevi, seborrhoeic keratoses, benign vascular tumours and dermatofibromas. Performance measures were diagnostic accuracy regarding malignancy as measured by the area under the curves of receiver operating curves (range: 0-1), as well as per cent correct diagnoses (range: 0-100%). RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy as well as per cent correct diagnoses increased by +0.21 and +32.9% (heuristic teaching) and +0.19 and +35.7% (analytic teaching) respectively (P for all <0.001). Neither for diagnostic accuracy (P = 0.585), nor for per cent correct diagnoses (P = 0.298) was a difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term training of dermatoscopy to medical students allows significant improvement in diagnostic abilities. Choosing a heuristic or analytic method does not have an influence on this effect in short training using common pigmented skin lesions.
BACKGROUND: There are two strategies to approach the dermatoscopic diagnosis of pigmented skin tumours, namely the verbal-based analytic and the more visual-global heuristic method. It is not known if one or the other is more efficient in teaching dermatoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To compare two teaching methods in short-term training of dermatoscopy to medical students. METHODS: Fifty-seven medical students in the last year of the curriculum were given a 1-h lecture of either the heuristic- or the analytic-based teaching of dermatoscopy. Before and after this session, they were shown the same 50 lesions and asked to diagnose them and rate for chance of malignancy. Test lesions consisted of melanomas, basal cell carcinomas, nevi, seborrhoeic keratoses, benign vascular tumours and dermatofibromas. Performance measures were diagnostic accuracy regarding malignancy as measured by the area under the curves of receiver operating curves (range: 0-1), as well as per cent correct diagnoses (range: 0-100%). RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy as well as per cent correct diagnoses increased by +0.21 and +32.9% (heuristic teaching) and +0.19 and +35.7% (analytic teaching) respectively (P for all <0.001). Neither for diagnostic accuracy (P = 0.585), nor for per cent correct diagnoses (P = 0.298) was a difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term training of dermatoscopy to medical students allows significant improvement in diagnostic abilities. Choosing a heuristic or analytic method does not have an influence on this effect in short training using common pigmented skin lesions.
Authors: Andreas Blum; Friedrich A Bahmer; Jürgen Bauer; Ralph P Braun; Brigitte Coras-Stepanek; Teresa Deinlein; Thomas Eigentler; Christine Fink; Claus Garbe; Holger A Haenssle; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Harald Kittler; Jürgen Kreusch; Hubert Pehamberger; Hans Schulz; H Peter Soyer; Wilhelm Stolz; Philipp Tschandl; Iris Zalaudek Journal: Hautarzt Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 0.751
Authors: Harald Kittler; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Giuseppe Argenziano; Cristina Carrera; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Josep Malvehy; Scott Menzies; Susana Puig; Harold Rabinovitz; Wilhelm Stolz; Toshiaki Saida; H Peter Soyer; Eliot Siegel; William V Stoecker; Alon Scope; Masaru Tanaka; Luc Thomas; Philipp Tschandl; Iris Zalaudek; Allan Halpern Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Elizabeth V Seiverling; Hadjh T Ahrns; Amrit Greene; Melissa Butt; Oriol Yélamos; Stephen W Dusza; Ashfaq A Marghoob Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2019 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: A Blum; J Kreusch; W Stolz; H Haenssle; R Braun; R Hofmann-Wellenhof; P Tschandl; I Zalaudek; H Kittler Journal: Hautarzt Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 0.751
Authors: Shirin Bajaj; Michael A Marchetti; Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Stephen W Dusza; Kivanc Kose; Ashfaq A Marghoob Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Rubeta N Matin; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Alana Durack; Abha Gulati; Sue Ann Chan; Louise Johnston; Susan E Bayliss; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Colette O'Sullivan; Hamid Tehrani; Hywel C Williams Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-12-04
Authors: Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Rubeta N Matin; David R Thomson; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Rachel Abbott; Monica Fawzy; Susan E Bayliss; Matthew J Grainge; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Fiona M Walter; Hywel C Williams Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-12-04