Željko Pedišić1, Adrian Bauman2. 1. Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. 2. Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Self-reports of physical activity (PA) have been the mainstay of measurement in most non-communicable disease (NCD) surveillance systems. To these, other measures are added to summate to a comprehensive PA surveillance system. Recently, some national NCD surveillance systems have started using accelerometers as a measure of PA. The purpose of this paper was specifically to appraise the suitability and role of accelerometers for population-level PA surveillance. METHODS: A thorough literature search was conducted to examine aspects of the generalisability, reliability, validity, comprehensiveness and between-study comparability of accelerometer estimates, and to gauge the simplicity, cost-effectiveness, adaptability and sustainability of their use in NCD surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerometer data collected in PA surveillance systems may not provide estimates that are generalisable to the target population. Accelerometer-based estimates have adequate reliability for PA surveillance, but there are still several issues associated with their validity. Accelerometer-based prevalence estimates are largely dependent on the investigators' choice of intensity cut-off points. Maintaining standardised accelerometer data collections in long-term PA surveillance systems is difficult, which may cause discontinuity in time-trend data. The use of accelerometers does not necessarily produce useful between-study and international comparisons due to lack of standardisation of data collection and processing methods. To conclude, it appears that accelerometers still have limitations regarding generalisability, validity, comprehensiveness, simplicity, affordability, adaptability, between-study comparability and sustainability. Therefore, given the current evidence, it seems that the widespread adoption of accelerometers specifically for large-scale PA surveillance systems may be premature. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVE: Self-reports of physical activity (PA) have been the mainstay of measurement in most non-communicable disease (NCD) surveillance systems. To these, other measures are added to summate to a comprehensive PA surveillance system. Recently, some national NCD surveillance systems have started using accelerometers as a measure of PA. The purpose of this paper was specifically to appraise the suitability and role of accelerometers for population-level PA surveillance. METHODS: A thorough literature search was conducted to examine aspects of the generalisability, reliability, validity, comprehensiveness and between-study comparability of accelerometer estimates, and to gauge the simplicity, cost-effectiveness, adaptability and sustainability of their use in NCD surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerometer data collected in PA surveillance systems may not provide estimates that are generalisable to the target population. Accelerometer-based estimates have adequate reliability for PA surveillance, but there are still several issues associated with their validity. Accelerometer-based prevalence estimates are largely dependent on the investigators' choice of intensity cut-off points. Maintaining standardised accelerometer data collections in long-term PA surveillance systems is difficult, which may cause discontinuity in time-trend data. The use of accelerometers does not necessarily produce useful between-study and international comparisons due to lack of standardisation of data collection and processing methods. To conclude, it appears that accelerometers still have limitations regarding generalisability, validity, comprehensiveness, simplicity, affordability, adaptability, between-study comparability and sustainability. Therefore, given the current evidence, it seems that the widespread adoption of accelerometers specifically for large-scale PA surveillance systems may be premature. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Sophie Baumann; Diana Guertler; Franziska Weymar; Martin Bahls; Marcus Dörr; Neeltje van den Berg; Ulrich John; Sabina Ulbricht Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2019-06-12
Authors: Khalida Ismail; Daniel Stahl; Adam Bayley; Katherine Twist; Kurtis Stewart; Katie Ridge; Emma Britneff; Mark Ashworth; Nicole de Zoysa; Jennifer Rundle; Derek Cook; Peter Whincup; Janet Treasure; Paul McCrone; Anne Greenough; Kirsty Winkley Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: T V Barreira; J M Schuna; C Tudor-Locke; J-P Chaput; T S Church; M Fogelholm; G Hu; R Kuriyan; A Kurpad; E V Lambert; C Maher; J Maia; V Matsudo; T Olds; V Onywera; O L Sarmiento; M Standage; M S Tremblay; P Zhao; P T Katzmarzyk Journal: Int J Obes Suppl Date: 2015-12-08
Authors: Dana L Wolff-Hughes; Richard P Troiano; William R Boyer; Eugene C Fitzhugh; James J McClain Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 4.018