Literature DB >> 25369357

'But you can't reverse a hysterectomy!' Perceptions of long acting reversible contraception (LARC) among young women aged 16-24 years: a qualitative study.

E Okpo1, L Allerton2, S Brechin3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Long Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) methods are highly effective in reducing the incidence of unwanted pregnancy. Recent data indicates that the rate of abortion in Grampian, North East of Scotland is above the Scottish average and LARC uptake among young women low. This study sought to explore young women's perceptions of LARC, with the aim of developing a strategy to increase LARC uptake. STUDY
DESIGN: Qualitative study.
METHODS: Sixty five women aged 16-24 were randomly recruited to this qualitative study from community centres and shopping areas. Recruitment and interviews were conducted in friendship pairs, triads or one-to-one basis. Participants were asked about current and past contraception use, views of contraception methods including LARC; and sources of information about contraception. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis.
RESULTS: Women interviewed were aware of some of the delivery systems used for long acting contraception (intrauterine devices, implants and injections) but did not recognise them as 'LARC'. 'Long acting' was equated with permanency and the term 'reversible' appeared to have the opposite effect to its intention. Intrauterine devices were commonly referred to as 'coil'. The women often relied on verbal testimonies from those who had experienced using LARC, many of which were negative and inaccurate. A lack of in-depth knowledge about LARC and the opinion that LARC methods were for older women were also cited as barriers to use.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that negative testimonies and the belief that LARC are not appropriate for young women may discourage LARC uptake.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraceptive; Interview; LARC; Perception; Qualitative study; Young adults

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25369357     DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  7 in total

1.  A Qualitative Study of Factors That Influence Contraceptive Choice among Adolescent School-Based Health Center Patients.

Authors:  Andrea J Hoopes; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Aletha Y Akers; Kym R Ahrens
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.814

2.  Prescription contraception use: a cross-sectional population study of psychosocial determinants.

Authors:  Gerard J Molloy; Leigh-Ann Sweeney; Molly Byrne; Carmel M Hughes; Roger Ingham; Karen Morgan; Andrew W Murphy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis.

Authors:  Abimbola A Ayorinde; Felicity Boardman; Majel McGranahan; Lucy Porter; Nwamaka A Eze; Anna Sallis; Rosanna Buck; Alison Hadley; Melissa Ludeke; Sue Mann; Oyinlola Oyebode
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Attitudes and Acceptability in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Key to Patient-Centered Contraceptive Counseling.

Authors:  Molly J Richards; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Jeanelle Sheeder
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 1.814

5.  A Qualitative Study of Prescription Contraception Use: The Perspectives of Users, General Practitioners and Pharmacists.

Authors:  Leigh-Ann Sweeney; Gerard J Molloy; Molly Byrne; Andrew W Murphy; Karen Morgan; Carmel M Hughes; Roger Ingham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Does counselling improve uptake of long-term and permanent contraceptive methods in a high HIV-prevalence setting?

Authors:  Amon Siveregi; Lilian Dudley; Courage Makumucha; Phatisizwe Dlamini; Sihle Moyo; Sibongiseni Bhembe
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2015-11-06

7.  Pregnant or recently pregnant opioid users: contraception decisions, perceptions and preferences.

Authors:  Rebecca L Fischbein; Bethany G Lanese; Lynn Falletta; Kelsey Hamilton; Jennifer A King; Deric R Kenne
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2018-03-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.