BACKGROUND: The treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) may cause substantial local and systemic symptomatic morbidities, but many patients have high symptom levels before treatment begins. Knowledge of disease-related (treatment-naive) symptom status would aid in the evaluation of the symptomatic benefit or burden of HNC therapies. METHODS: The authors retrospectively examined symptoms, quality of life, and health status reported by patients with HNC who were naive to any treatment. Symptoms were explored by anatomical site and disease factors were correlated with symptom severity and interference. A clustering algorithm was used to identify a subset of highly symptomatic patients, and the effects of disease site, tumor stage, and demographic variables on membership in this high-symptom group were examined. RESULTS: A total of 748 treatment-naive patients with mucosal (434 patients), nonmucosal (272 patients), or skull base (42 patients) tumors were identified who had rated their symptoms using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. The majority of patients were white non-Hispanic (82%) and male (68%), with a median age of 59 years. Approximately one-third the patients had a high pretreatment symptom burden. Pain, fatigue, distress, and disturbed sleep were the most severe symptoms reported, regardless of tumor stage or site. Symptom burden was found to be higher among patients with more advanced disease. Predictors of a high symptom burden included having a mucosal tumor and being female. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of moderate to severe symptoms found in the current study demonstrates the importance of assessing patient-reported symptoms routinely before treatment is initiated and emphasizes the need for symptom management in parallel with disease treatment. Baseline characterization of symptom status should be incorporated into clinical trials that may affect symptom burden.
BACKGROUND: The treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) may cause substantial local and systemic symptomatic morbidities, but many patients have high symptom levels before treatment begins. Knowledge of disease-related (treatment-naive) symptom status would aid in the evaluation of the symptomatic benefit or burden of HNC therapies. METHODS: The authors retrospectively examined symptoms, quality of life, and health status reported by patients with HNC who were naive to any treatment. Symptoms were explored by anatomical site and disease factors were correlated with symptom severity and interference. A clustering algorithm was used to identify a subset of highly symptomatic patients, and the effects of disease site, tumor stage, and demographic variables on membership in this high-symptom group were examined. RESULTS: A total of 748 treatment-naive patients with mucosal (434 patients), nonmucosal (272 patients), or skull base (42 patients) tumors were identified who had rated their symptoms using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. The majority of patients were white non-Hispanic (82%) and male (68%), with a median age of 59 years. Approximately one-third the patients had a high pretreatment symptom burden. Pain, fatigue, distress, and disturbed sleep were the most severe symptoms reported, regardless of tumor stage or site. Symptom burden was found to be higher among patients with more advanced disease. Predictors of a high symptom burden included having a mucosal tumor and being female. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of moderate to severe symptoms found in the current study demonstrates the importance of assessing patient-reported symptoms routinely before treatment is initiated and emphasizes the need for symptom management in parallel with disease treatment. Baseline characterization of symptom status should be incorporated into clinical trials that may affect symptom burden.
Keywords:
MD Anderson Symptom Inventory; cancer site; cancer stage; head and neck cancer; patient-reported outcomes; symptom assessment; symptom burden; symptom interference; symptom severity; treatment-naive
Authors: Farzan Siddiqui; Thomas F Pajak; Deborah Watkins-Bruner; Andre A Konski; James C Coyne; Clement K Gwede; Adam S Garden; Sharon A Spencer; Christopher Jones; Benjamin Movsas Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-09-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: David R Buchanan; Jeffrey D White; Ann M O'Mara; Joseph W Kelaghan; Wendy B Smith; Lori M Minasian Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tito R Mendoza; Adriano V Laudico; Xin Shelley Wang; Hong Guo; Maria Lourdes Matsuda; Victor D Yosuico; Edilberto P Fragante; Charles S Cleeland Journal: Oncology Date: 2010-11-22 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: M H J van den Beuken-van Everdingen; J M de Rijke; A G Kessels; H C Schouten; M van Kleef; J Patijn Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Ethan Basch; Amy P Abernethy; C Daniel Mullins; Bryce B Reeve; Mary Lou Smith; Stephen Joel Coons; Jeff Sloan; Keith Wenzel; Cynthia Chauhan; Wayland Eppard; Elizabeth S Frank; Joseph Lipscomb; Stephen A Raymond; Merianne Spencer; Sean Tunis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-10-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Karmen N Schmidt; Kärin Olson; Catherine Kubrak; Matthew Parliament; Sunita Ghosh Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Heidi Mason; Mary Beth DeRubeis; Nancy Burke; Melissa Shannon; Danielle Karsies; Gregory Wolf; Avi Eisbruch; Francis Worden Journal: World J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-04-10
Authors: Christine S Ritchie; Fengmin Zhao; Kanan Patel; Judith Manola; Elizabeth A Kvale; Claire F Snyder; Michael J Fisch Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Velda J Gonzalez; Susan McMillan; Elsa Pedro; Maribel Tirado-Gomez; Leorey N Saligan Journal: P R Health Sci J Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 0.705
Authors: Poolakkad S Satheeshkumar; Mohammed El-Dallal; Y Raita; Minu P Mohan; E Adjei Boakye Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Elisabeth G Vichaya; Bianca G Ford; Cana B Quave; M Raafay Rishi; Aaron J Grossberg; Robert Dantzer Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Tito R Mendoza; Kenneth L Kehl; Oluwatosin Bamidele; Loretta A Williams; Qiuling Shi; Charles S Cleeland; George Simon Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-01-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Janet H Van Cleave; Mei R Fu; Antonia V Bennett; Catherine Concert; Ann Riccobene; Anh Tran; Allison Most; Maria Kamberi; Jacqueline Mojica; Justin Savitski; Elise Kusche; Mark S Persky; Zujun Li; Adam S Jacobson; Kenneth S Hu; Michael J Persky; Eva Liang; Patricia M Corby; Brian L Egleston Journal: Mhealth Date: 2021-01-20