Literature DB >> 16414555

Asking the community about cutpoints used to describe mild, moderate, and severe pain.

Guadalupe R Palos1, Tito R Mendoza, Gary M Mobley, Scott B Cantor, Charles S Cleeland.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Clinical practice guidelines recommend that numeric rating scales be used to document the severity of perceived pain, yet patients and clinicians often opt to use simpler classification systems such as mild, moderate, or severe. To assess how well the numeric scales correlate with the tri-level classification system for describing pain severity, we conducted a subanalysis of a larger population-based study of pain management preferences. Our primary objective was to identify the numeric boundaries used by 287 adults to describe pain as mild, moderate, or severe. We examined differences in the means of the upper and lower limits for mild, moderate, and severe pain according to demographic characteristics and type of pain. Ranges reported for each pain level were 1.3 to 3.6 (mild), 4.3 to 6.5 (moderate), and 7.5 to 9.8 (severe). The primary finding was that "healthy" community adults rated the pain severity cutpoints much as patients with clinical pain did, 1 to 4 for mild, 5 to 6 for moderate, and 7 to 10 for severe. These results suggest that numeric rating scales can be used in clinical practice with both patients and community-dwelling adults. Our findings also support encouraging the general public to use a 0 to 10 scale to rate their pain intensity. PERSPECTIVE: Methods used to describe numeric cutpoints for mild, moderate, and severe pain were applied to community adults. Having standard categories to describe pain severity might increase clinicians' confidence in using a numeric scale to make treatment decisions. Further studies of cutpoint methodology and its clinical importance are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16414555     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  45 in total

1.  The Brief Pain Inventory and its "pain at its worst in the last 24 hours" item: clinical trial endpoint considerations.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Tito R Mendoza; Laura Sit; Steven Passik; Howard I Scher; Charles Cleeland; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Consistency and Accuracy of Multiple Pain Scales Measured in Cancer Patients From Multiple Ethnic Groups.

Authors:  Ok-Kyung Ham; Youjeong Kang; Helen Teng; Yaelim Lee; Eun-Ok Im
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.592

3.  The symptom burden of treatment-naive patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Ehab Y Hanna; Tito R Mendoza; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn; Pamela Sehra; Emre Yucel; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  [What does pain intensity mean from the patient perspective? : A qualitative study on the patient perspective of pain intensity as an outcome parameter in treatment evaluation and on the interpretability of pain intensity measurements].

Authors:  K Neustadt; S Deckert; C Kopkow; A Preißler; B Bosse; C Funke; L Jacobi; P Mattenklodt; B Nagel; P Seidel; R Sittl; E Steffen; R Sabatowski; J Schmitt; U Kaiser
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D, and comparison of their psychometric properties in a spinal postoperative Spanish population.

Authors:  Carmen Selva-Sevilla; Paula Ferrara; Manuel Gerónimo-Pardo
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-02-17

6.  The symptom burden of primary brain tumors: evidence for a core set of tumor- and treatment-related symptoms.

Authors:  Terri S Armstrong; Elizabeth Vera-Bolanos; Alvina A Acquaye; Mark R Gilbert; Harshad Ladha; Tito Mendoza
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Establishing mild, moderate, and severe scores for cancer-related symptoms: how consistent and clinically meaningful are interference-based severity cut-points?

Authors:  Barbara Given; Charles W Given; Alla Sikorskii; Sangchoon Jeon; Ruth McCorkle; Victoria Champion; David Decker
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Pain intensity and severe pain in young immigrant patients with long-standing back pain.

Authors:  Monica Löfvander; Marina Taloyan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Foot Problems in Older Adults Associations with Incident Falls, Frailty Syndrome, and Sensor-Derived Gait, Balance, and Physical Activity Measures.

Authors:  Amy Muchna; Bijan Najafi; Christopher S Wendel; Michael Schwenk; David G Armstrong; Jane Mohler
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2017-08-30

10.  When knee pain becomes severe: a nested case-control analysis in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  George Peat; Elaine Thomas
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.