| Literature DB >> 25366653 |
Haixing Yang, Wenjuan Zhang, Chao Huang, Wei Zhou, Yao Yao, Zhenzhong Wang, Yan Li, Wei Xiao1, Yonghua Wang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Compared with the traditional oral administration form, injection administration is basically superior in terms of both biological availability and therapeutic effects. However, few researches have focused on the traditional Chinese medicinal injection due to the complicated constituents and the intricate mechanism of action.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25366653 PMCID: PMC4506441 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Figure 1The integrative ADME filtering model. The model includes the key ADME process such as membrane penetrating, cell uptake, protein transporting and binding, metabolism of bioactive substances, and drug excretion. Abbreviations: PPB, Plasma-protein binding; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; P450, cytochrome P450.
Pharmacokinetic property predictions for the 35 molecules and their network parameters
| ID | Compound | logS | logP | 2C9 | 2D6 | 3A4 | PPB | P-gp | Y(t1/2) | TS | Betweenness | Degree | Structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | L-phenylalaninosecologanin B | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | + | - | 0.34 | 1.60E-02 | 7 |
|
| M2 | L-phenylalaninosecologanin C | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.84 | 9.46E-03 | 5 |
|
| M3 | secoxyloganin | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.39 | 1.32E-02 | 6 |
|
| M4 | geniposide | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.44 | 7.08E-02 | 11 |
|
| M8 | 5H,8H-pyrano[4,3-d]thiazolo[3,2-a]pyridine-3-carboxylic acid | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.79 | 0 | 0 |
|
| M9 | vogeloside | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.46 | 1.00E-05 | 2 |
|
| M10 | 7-epi-vogeloside | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.46 | 1.00E + 00 | 2 |
|
| M13 | 7,8,11-trihydroxy-1-hydroperoxy-4-guaien-3-one | + | + | U.C. | U.C. | + | + | + | - | 0.18 | 2.74E-02 | 4 |
|
| M17 | 3, 3′, 5-trimethoxy-4′, 7-epoxy-8, 5′-neolignan-4, 9, 9′-triol | + | + | + | U.C. | + | - | - | + | 0.47 | 0 | 0 |
|
| M19 | 5-benzofurancarboxylic acid, 2,3-dihydro-2-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-3-(hydroxymethyl)-7-methoxy | + | + | + | U.C. | + | - | + | - | 0.36 | 6.70E-02 | 26 |
|
| M20 | 5-benzofurancarboxylic acid | + | + | + | U.C. | + | - | + | + | 0.44 | 6.93E-02 | 27 |
|
| M21 | threo-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-[2-hydroxy-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)phenoxy]-1, 3-propanediol | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.35 | 8.84E-02 | 23 |
|
| M30 | Quercetin | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | 0.28 | 1.75E-01 | 39 |
|
| M31 | Rutin | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | + | 0.68 | 6.51E-02 | 20 |
|
| M33 | luteolin 7-O-β-D-glucoside | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | 0.78 | 2.65E-02 | 13 |
|
| M34 | Luteolin | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | 0.25 | 1.20E-01 | 35 |
|
| M38 | 3,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | 0.68 | 1.58E-02 | 8 |
|
| M39 | 3,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic methyl ester | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | 0.68 | 1.45E-02 | 7 |
|
| M41 | 4,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic methyl ester | + | + | + | U.C. | + | - | - | - | 0.69 | 1.01E-02 | 10 |
|
| M54 | (2E,6S)-8-[α-L-arabinopyranosyl-(1″-6′)-β-D-glucopyranosyloxy]-2,6-dimethylct-2-eno-1,2″-lactone | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.78 | 1.10E-04 | 2 |
|
| M55 | 5-O-caffeoylquinic methyl ester | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | 0.36 | 2.25E-02 | 16 |
|
| M56 | 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid | + | + | + | + | + | - | + | - | 0.33 | 4.55E-03 | 7 |
|
| M57 | 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid | + | + | + | U.C. | + | - | + | - | 0.33 | 1.74E-02 | 11 |
|
| M58 | 4-O-caffeoylquinic methyl ester | + | + | + | U.C. | + | - | + | - | 0.36 | 1.96E-02 | 12 |
|
| M61 | geniposidic acid | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.41 | 1.28E-02 | 5 |
|
| M62 | genipin-1-β-D-gentiobioside | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.83 | 2.73E-02 | 4 |
|
| M63 | 6′′-O-trans-p-coumaroylgenipin gentiobioside | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.45 | 0 | 0 |
|
| M64 | 6′′-O-trans-p-feruloylgenipin gentiobioside | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.39 | 0 | 0 |
|
| M65 | 6′′-O-trans-sinapoylgenipin gentiobioside | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.34 | 0 | 0 |
|
| M66 | Jasmigeniposide A | + | + | U.C. | U.C. | + | + | - | + | 0.40 | 1.00E-05 | 2 |
|
| M69 | 2′-O-trans-caffeoylgardoside | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.79 | 0 | 0 |
|
| M1_sg | L-phenylalaninosecologanin B_qt | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | + | - | 0.34 | 2.36E-01 | 42 |
|
| M2_sg | L-phenylalaninosecologanin C_qt | + | + | + | U.C. | + | + | - | - | 0.37 | 2.63E-01 | 45 |
|
| M8_sg | 5H,8H-pyrano[4,3-d]thiazolo[3,2-a]pyridine-3-carboxylic acid_qt | + | + | U.C. | U.C. | + | + | + | - | 0.23 | 1.37E-02 | 2 |
|
| M66_sg | Jasmigeniposide A_qt | + | + | U.C. | U.C. | + | + | - | + | 0.74 | 3.60E-04 | 2 |
|
U.C.: uncertain; +: the compound can overcome the barriers; −: the compound cannot overcome the barriers.
Figure 2The drug-target network. A drug node (circle, purple) and a target node (circle, green) are connected to each other by blue edge if the protein is the target of the drug. The size of one node is proportional to its degree.
Figure 3The target-disease network. A target node (circle, purple) and a disease node (square, green) are connected to each other by grey edge if the target is involved in the related pharmacological process. The size of one node is proportional to its degree.
Figure 4The target-pathway network. A target node (circle, purple) and a pathway node (hexagon, blue) are connected to each other by blue edge if the target is mapped on the pathway. The size of one node is proportional to its degree.
Figure 5Distribution of target proteins on the compressed ‘influenza-related pathway’. Pathways are marked in pink and our putative drug targets are marked in green. Arrows indicate activation, T-arrows indicated inhibition, and segments indicate actions that can either be activatory or inhibitory on the specific targets.
Figure 6Effect of different treatment upon LPS-induced NO release from RAW264.7 cells. The cells were pretreated with various concentrations of M38 (A), M57 (B) and M56 (C) for 2 h and then incubated with LPS (100 ng/ml) or LPS only for 20 h. Values are the mean ± SD for n= 3, *p< 0.05 and **p< 0.01.