| Literature DB >> 25366331 |
Paul A Jensen1, Bonnie V Dougherty2, Thomas J Moutinho3, Jason A Papin4.
Abstract
We present a miniaturized plate reader for measuring optical density in 96-well plates. Our standalone reader fits in most incubators, environmental chambers, or biological containment suites, allowing users to leverage their existing laboratory infrastructure. The device contains no moving parts, allowing an entire 96-well plate to be read several times per second. We demonstrate how the fast sampling rate allows our reader to detect small changes in optical density, even when the device is placed in a shaking incubator. A wireless communication module allows remote monitoring of multiple devices in real time. These features allow easy assembly of multiple readers to create a scalable, accurate solution for high-throughput phenotypic screening.Entities:
Keywords: growth curve; multiwell plate assays; phenotypic screening; plate reader
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25366331 PMCID: PMC4359207 DOI: 10.1177/2211068214555414
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Lab Autom ISSN: 2211-0682
Figure 1.Design of a miniaturized multiwell optical density (OD) reader. (A) Schematic for OD sensor. An infrared light-emitting diode (LED) emits light at 870 nm, which is received by a phototransistor (PT). The light results in a proportional drop in voltage across the 100k ohm resistor, which is read at VOUT (output voltage). (B) Sensor output varies linearly throughout a range of OD. Readings for 96 wells on a single plate shown at 9 dilutions of a bacterial suspension. (C) A multiplexed grid for reading individual wells. Each of the 96 LEDs can be connected to the circuit independently by switching 2 analog multiplexers. One multiplexer connects all anodes in a single column, and the second connects all cathodes in a single row. The red line indicates an active connection through the LED corresponding to well D8. The same board layout can be used to connect the PTs above the multiwell plate.
Figure 2.(A) Close-up of the phototransistor (PT) (top) and light-emitting diode (LED) (bottom) arrays. (B) The overall dimensions of the miniaturized reader are slightly larger than those of a standard 96-well plate. (C) Eight miniaturized plate readers stacked in a standard bench top incubator.
Figure 3.(A) Performance comparison between our miniaturized plate reader (vertical) and a commercial system, the Tecan Infinite Pro 200 (horizontal). The bacteria Escherichia coli K12 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 were grown in multiple conditions. Growth rates were normalized to E. coli grown in LB with supplemental glucose. Each point represents a biological replicate. Vertical and horizontal bars indicate the standard deviation from 24 technical replicates. (B) Comparison between miniaturized plate reader (vertical) and batch cultures grown in 500 ml flasks (horizontal). Growth rates were normalized to E. coli grown in LB. Each point represents a biological replicate. (C) Shaking does not affect device performance. Comparison between growth curve of P. aeruginosa in LB, with (blue) and without (red) shaking at 100 rpm. Readings were collected every 120 s.
Figure 4.Multiple configurations for the miniaturized plate reader system. (A) Standalone reader with data stored on a Secure Digital (SD) memory card. (B) Reader transmitting data to a database server for storage and processing. (C) Multiple readers as part of a high-throughput screening system. (D) Reader with on-board computer. The computer provides a Wi-Fi hotspot to visualize data through the internet.