Literature DB >> 25365513

Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: common management policies among pediatric ophthalmologists.

Gad Dotan, Leonard B Nelson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study common management policies of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNDLO) among pediatric ophthalmologists.
METHODS: A 21-question survey was sent to members of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus in April 2014. The questions focused on treatment of CNLDO during the first year of life, primary and secondary surgical interventions, surgical techniques, and amblyopia assessment.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven members completed the survey and 121 responses were analyzed after replies of 6 candidates in training were excluded. Eighty-two percent of respondents instructed caregivers to massage the nasolacrimal duct during the first year of life; however, 55% did not perform the Crigler massage in the office. Outpatient probing was done by 17% of pediatric ophthalmologists who took the survey, almost all of whom (95%) have been in practice more than 10 years. Ninety-one percent recommended surgery for CNLDO close to the age of 1 year and 79% performed probing as initial treatment at that age. If treatment is delayed to the age of 2 years, 53% favored silicone tube intubation and/or balloon dacryoplasty. Following failed probing, silicone tube intubation was performed by 51% of practitioners. Ninety-one percent of respondents routinely checked refraction of infants with CNLDO and recommended reexamination even if initial assessment was entirely normal.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the striking lack of consensus among pediatric ophthalmologists in many aspects of management of CNLDO and allows practitioners to compare their practice patterns regarding CNLDO management with those of their peers; however, because it provides only the opinions of a limited group of pediatric ophthalmologists, it does not imply that less common practices are wrong. Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25365513     DOI: 10.3928/01913913-20141028-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus        ISSN: 0191-3913            Impact factor:   1.402


  8 in total

1.  [Increased prevalence of congenital dacryostenosis following cesarean section].

Authors:  Claudia Kuhli-Hattenbach; M Lüchtenberg; C Hofmann; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Treatment of congenital lacrimal duct obstruction: A prospective clinical cohort study].

Authors:  J Heichel; F Bachner; A Schmidt-Pokrzywniak; H-G Struck; U Stuhlträger; T Bredehorn-Mayr
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular intubation after failed probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Mohammad Taher Rajabi; Najmeh Zavarzadeh; Alireza Mahmoudi; Mohammad Karim Johari; Seyedeh Simindokht Hosseini; Yalda Abrishami; Mohammad Bagher Rajabi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Pediatric nasolacrimal duct obstruction-benefit of a combined therapeutic approach.

Authors:  Miloš Fischer; Iris-Susanne Horn; Mathias Otto; Mandy Pirlich; Andreas Dietz; Christian Mozet
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.764

5.  Effect of age on primary balloon dacryocystoplasty and probing success in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Volkan Dericioğlu; Mehmet Orkun Sevik; Sena Sümmen Saçu; Muhsin Eraslan; Eren Çerman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 2.029

6.  Spontaneous resolution rates in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction managed with massage or topical antibiotics compared with observation alone.

Authors:  Brian G Mohney; Saraniya Sathiamoorthi; Ryan D Frank
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.908

7.  Outcomes of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Surgery Converted into Balloon Dilation and Silicone Intubation due to Probing Difficulty.

Authors:  Oren Yaakov Sagiv; Achia Nemet; Asaf Achiron; Doron Neumann; Raimo Tuuminen; Oriel Spierer
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Universal ocular screening of 481 infants using wide-field digital imaging system.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Guangda Deng; Jing Ma; Jinghua Liu; Songfeng Li; Hai Lu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.209

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.