Literature DB >> 25365444

Factors associated with placement of rural primary care physicians in North Carolina.

Christopher Duffrin1, Sebastian Diaz1, Molly Cashion1, Ricky Watson1, Doyle Cummings1, Natalie Jackson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine what factors influence primary care physicians to choose rural practice locations to better develop the rural workforce in North Carolina. To better recruit and retain physicians, residents, and medical students for rural practice, we must understand what factors positively influence their choice of practice location.
METHODS: A survey was sent to all primary care physicians licensed in the state of North Carolina (N = 2829), with 975 usable (return rate 34.5%). Results were analyzed using basic descriptive statistics and χ(2) automatic interaction detection analysis.
RESULTS: Findings indicated that solo practice, critical access hospital, community health center, or federally qualified health center sites were strongly associated with rural practice. Pay as a factor in choosing a work site, financial support from a hospital, and medical school loan repayment also was correlated with rural practice. Seventy-two percent of rural physicians reported being raised in a town of ≤11,000, which was found to be highly associated with working in a rural area. This single point is highly indicative of rural practice and by defining this new level it roughly doubles the predictive value previously defined by other researchers.
CONCLUSIONS: Incentives such as loan repayment, salary guarantees, and practice assistance for rural physicians currently provided under several federal and state programs should continue to assist in attracting primary care physicians to rural areas. Having been raised in an area of ≤11,000 was highly predictive of future rural medical practice and could be used in the recruitment of physicians and residents to increase the ultimate yield for rural areas. With these new data, North Carolina medical schools and practices serving rural areas may be able to better recruit and retain physicians with a predilection to rural practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25365444     DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  7 in total

Review 1.  Predictors of Primary Care Physician Practice Location in Underserved Urban or Rural Areas in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Amelia Goodfellow; Jesus G Ulloa; Patrick T Dowling; Efrain Talamantes; Somil Chheda; Curtis Bone; Gerardo Moreno
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Obstetric Provider Trainees in Georgia: Characteristics and Attitudes About Practice in Obstetric Provider Shortage Areas.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smulian; Leilah Zahedi; Julie Hurvitz; Abigail Talbot; Audra Williams; Zoë Julian; Adrienne D Zertuche; Roger Rochat
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-07

3.  Rural Workforce Years: Quantifying the Rural Workforce Contribution of Family Medicine Residency Graduates.

Authors:  Peter Meyers; Elizabeth Wilkinson; Stephen Petterson; Davis G Patterson; Randall Longenecker; David Schmitz; Andrew Bazemore
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-12-04

4.  Student perception about working in rural United States/Canada after graduation: a study in an offshore Caribbean medical school.

Authors:  P Ravi Shankar; Arun K Dubey; Atanu Nandy; Burton L Herz; Brian W Little
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-12-10

5.  Recruiting Rural Healthcare Providers Today: a Systematic Review of Training Program Success and Determinants of Geographic Choices.

Authors:  Ian T MacQueen; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons; Gina Capra; Laura Raaen; Jesus G Ulloa; Paul G Shekelle; Isomi Miake-Lye; Jessica M Beroes; Susanne Hempel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Challenges to the Israeli healthcare system: attracting medical students to primary care and to the periphery.

Authors:  Charles Weissman; Rachel Yaffa Zisk-Rony; Alexander Avidan; Uriel Elchalal; Howard Tandeter
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2018-05-29

7.  Could the UK Foundation Programme training post allocation process result in regional variations in the knowledge and skills of Foundation doctors? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Christopher Beck; Celia Brown
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.