Chang Su1, Li-Zhen Liao1, Yan Song1, Zhi-Wei Xu1, Wei-Yi Mei1. 1. 1 Department of Hematology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China ; 2 Department of Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou 510080, China ; 3 Department of Pathophysiology, ZhongShan Medical College, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China ; 4 Department of Cardiology, Huangpu Division of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Red cell distribution width (RDW) might be a novel biomarker that reflects multiple physiological impairments related to atherosclerosis and coronary artery diseases (CAD). We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association of RDW between all-cause mortality and fatal/non-fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in CAD patients. METHODS: Relevant studies were searched and identified in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. English-language prospective studies that reported risk estimates for RDW and mortality/CVD events were included. Data were extracted regarding the characteristics and clinical outcomes, and a quality assessment was conducted. Results were extracted for the highest versus lowest RDW level, and meta-analyses were carried out using random effects models. RESULTS: We identified 22 studies enrolling 80,216 participants. The study duration ranged between 1 month and 23 years. Of the 15 studies that were included in the meta-analysis, higher RDW indicated a significant increased risk for all-cause mortality in CAD patients: pooled risk ratio (RR) 2.20 (95% CI, 1.42-3.39; P<0.0004). The results for fatal, non-fatal and fatal/non-fatal events were: pooled RR 1.80 (95% CI, 1.35-2.41; P<0.0001), RR 1.86 (95% CI, 1.50-2.31; P<0.00001) and RR 2.13 (95% CI, 1.20-3.77; P=0.01). Heterogeneity was moderately present; however, sensitivity analyses for follow-up duration, CAD subtype, or RDW as dichotomous values showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis indicates that higher RDW levels are associated with increased risk of mortality and CVD events in patients with established CAD.
BACKGROUND: Red cell distribution width (RDW) might be a novel biomarker that reflects multiple physiological impairments related to atherosclerosis and coronary artery diseases (CAD). We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association of RDW between all-cause mortality and fatal/non-fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in CAD patients. METHODS: Relevant studies were searched and identified in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. English-language prospective studies that reported risk estimates for RDW and mortality/CVD events were included. Data were extracted regarding the characteristics and clinical outcomes, and a quality assessment was conducted. Results were extracted for the highest versus lowest RDW level, and meta-analyses were carried out using random effects models. RESULTS: We identified 22 studies enrolling 80,216 participants. The study duration ranged between 1 month and 23 years. Of the 15 studies that were included in the meta-analysis, higher RDW indicated a significant increased risk for all-cause mortality in CAD patients: pooled risk ratio (RR) 2.20 (95% CI, 1.42-3.39; P<0.0004). The results for fatal, non-fatal and fatal/non-fatal events were: pooled RR 1.80 (95% CI, 1.35-2.41; P<0.0001), RR 1.86 (95% CI, 1.50-2.31; P<0.00001) and RR 2.13 (95% CI, 1.20-3.77; P=0.01). Heterogeneity was moderately present; however, sensitivity analyses for follow-up duration, CAD subtype, or RDW as dichotomous values showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis indicates that higher RDW levels are associated with increased risk of mortality and CVD events in patients with established CAD.
Entities:
Keywords:
Red cell distribution width (RDW); cardiovascular (CV); coronary artery diseases (CAD); meta-analysis; mortality
Authors: Jason M Lappé; Benjamin D Horne; Svati H Shah; Heidi T May; Joseph B Muhlestein; Donald L Lappé; Abdallah G Kfoury; John F Carlquist; Deborah Budge; Rami Alharethi; Tami L Bair; William E Kraus; Jeffrey L Anderson Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 3.786
Authors: Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-07-21
Authors: Rifki Ucler; Mehmet Aslan; Murat Atmaca; Murat Alay; Esra Nur Ademoglu; Zehra Candan; Ismail Gulsen Journal: Int J Clin Exp Med Date: 2015-04-15
Authors: Lauro L Abrahan; John Daniel A Ramos; Elleen L Cunanan; Marc Denver A Tiongson; Felix Eduardo R Punzalan Journal: Cardiol Res Date: 2018-06-06